Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DethRidesAHorse

You have a pretty crazy stereotype of women. Maybe you’ve been around a lot of loonies, but, there are a lot of women who are capable of making decisions and sticking to it. I’ll go ahead and also disagree about your “average woman” comment. I didn’t know there was a difference between the “average woman” and one who runs for office.

---

Stereotypes are healthy but what hes not realizing is that women are flaking out on Him. Lol. Women take care of important ****. They flake on stuff they dont give a damn about.

54 Deep Into the Night

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sluggo1

AOC is a total moron.

Many women could fill the shoes of a public official.

Condaleeza Rice
Nicky Hailey
Tulsi Gabbard
Sarah Palin
Hillary Clinton
Pocahontas
Kamala Harris

All have the brains and wherewithal to hold public office.

---

Kamala Harris can't decide whether she wants to eliminate private insurance or not. First she says she will and then says she won't. This is precisely what i'm talking about.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nastynice

I'd love to see your answer, if you had a son and daughter in high school and both told you they want to be politicians. I wonder how you'd respond

---

i'd probably support both, unless I knew they'd be corrupt as Trump, but then that would put into question what kind of father I was up until that point.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by marychristine

Stereotypes are healthy but what hes not realizing is that women are flaking out on Him. Lol. Women take care of important ****. They flake on stuff they dont give a damn about.

54 Deep Into the Night

---

Mary, perhaps you don't realize it, but being flakey is a symptom of being indecisive. So saying women are simply flakey isn't really much of an argument to my point. If anything it helps it, so thank you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

I know that is why you posted in the AOC thread. You wanted to make her look bad. But the first tweet says "Republicans are running TV ads setting pictures of me on fire", which is violent rhetoric, which you claimed you are against no matter what side, and yet said nothing about it until I called you out.

How come you did not mention her tweet about that? Because what this was all about was to hate on AOC.

---

why do you cherry pick part of a tweet to fit your agenda. it's not Republicans, it's 1 Republican, an Asian, not a racist. the other part of that tweet said "to convince people that they aren't racist." this from an Asian, not a racist. AOC was wrong, it's okay to admit that.

---

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bramaca

It really doesn’t matter why you posted that article. The whole thing is about AOC, just because her response is what you want to talk about doesn’t mean anyone else has to. IMO the GOP running an add about her being compared to a genocidal regime is a much more significant part of the story and definitely more important to address. It’s like a contractor told you the foundation of your house is crumbling but all you want to talk about is the ugly colour of the drapes.

---

yes it does matter. it's ignorance for AOC to say anything about racist. again, about an Asian Republican.

the ad should not have happened, but lets not ignore AOC's stupidity and manipulating people into believing something that is not true.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

why do you cherry pick part of a tweet to fit your agenda. it's not Republicans, it's 1 Republican, an Asian, not a racist. the other part of that tweet said "to convince people that they aren't racist." this from an Asian, not a racist. AOC was wrong, it's okay to admit that.

---

Says the guy who posted a tweet of someone comparing AOC to genocide and not addressing that at all. You literally didn't mention it until I brought it up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

Says the guy who posted a tweet of someone comparing AOC to genocide and not addressing that at all. You literally didn't mention it until I brought it up.

---

again, in the AOC thread. what part of this is hard to understand. I addressed what she said, what she was wrong about, in the thread about her.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

again, in the AOC thread. what part of this is hard to understand. I addressed what she said, what she was wrong about, in the thread about her.

---

Yes, someone comparing her to Genocide is about her. Are you saying that comparing AOC to genocide has nothing to do with AOC?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

why do you cherry pick part of a tweet to fit your agenda. it's not Republicans, it's 1 Republican, an Asian, not a racist. the other part of that tweet said "to convince people that they aren't racist." this from an Asian, not a racist. AOC was wrong, it's okay to admit that.

---

---

yes it does matter. it's ignorance for AOC to say anything about racist. again, about an Asian Republican.

the ad should not have happened, but lets not ignore AOC's stupidity and manipulating people into believing something that is not true.

---

Didn’t realize that Asians couldn’t be racist. That’s news to me. And once again nobody is tied to discussing only the narrative that you want.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

again, in the AOC thread. what part of this is hard to understand. I addressed what she said, what she was wrong about, in the thread about her.

---

So in any thread about Trump you always post about what dumb crap comes out of his mouth in response to what someone else says or does about him? Everyone here, including you, knows that’s complete ********. This is a poor deflection as to why you didn’t address the attack on AOC.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

Yes, someone comparing her to Genocide is about her. Are you saying that comparing AOC to genocide has nothing to do with AOC?

---

I covered something AOC said that I thought was important. you alone I think should be someone to support this one thing she said that was wrong. racism is a problem in America and someone shouldn't abuse the word for a political agenda.

---

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bramaca

Didn’t realize that Asians couldn’t be racist. That’s news to me. And once again nobody is tied to discussing only the narrative that you want.

---

nobody said/should say that an Asian can't be racist. but how can someone Asian be a white supremacist?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bramaca

So in any thread about Trump you always post about what dumb crap comes out of his mouth in response to what someone else says or does about him? Everyone here, including you, knows that’s complete ********. This is a poor deflection as to why you didn’t address the attack on AOC.

---

I actually did say something about the attack on AOC. you have posted in this thread so you should know this.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

I can only comment on what I know about. I know nothing about the Khmer Rouge.



I don't agree with the original video used against AOC. I didn't like or agree with her face ending up in fire. I didn't even watch the entire video, just saw the part with AOC's face ending up on fire.
I know nothing about Khmer Rouge so I don't know the comparison.

the point in why I posted this story is to show the stupidity of AOC and how easily words like white supremacist and racist get thrown around. this had nothing to do with that yet AOC was stupid enough to say that.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

I covered something AOC said that I thought was important. you alone I think should be someone to support this one thing she said that was wrong. racism is a problem in America and someone shouldn't abuse the word for a political agenda

---

I know you thought that was important. But in another thread, literally days before you posted this about AOC, you claimed that violent rhetoric, from any side, was important. So it seems odd if you find that so important that you would post a story where someone uses violent rhetoric against AOC and make no mention of the violent rhetoric until you were called out.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

I know you thought that was important. But in another thread, literally days before you posted this about AOC, you claimed that violent rhetoric, from any side, was important. So it seems odd if you find that so important that you would post a story where someone uses violent rhetoric against AOC and make no mention of the violent rhetoric until you were called out.

---

this coming from you is rich considering it took you weeks to have a problem with the violent rhetoric in the other that that you're bringing up here. I replied about this violent rhetoric against AOC in the very next chance I was given.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

this coming from you is rich considering it took you weeks to have a problem with the violent rhetoric in the other that that you're bringing up here. I replied about this violent rhetoric against AOC in the very next chance I was given.

---

Only once I confronted you about it. Had I not, you never would have brought it up. And I had a problem with the violent rhetoric from the very beginning, but I had a bigger problem with you tried to insinuate that all the violent rhetoric you posted came from the left, when in reality most of it came from the right.

The reason it took me weeks to actually address the violent rhetoric is because for weeks you refused to admit that your violent rhetoric you posted was not all from the left.

Face it, we all just saw in here that you don't actually care about violent rhetoric as long as it's not against Trump. If you did, you'd have posted about it when someone said it to AOC. But you didn't.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

Only once I confronted you about it. Had I not, you never would have brought it up. And I had a problem with the violent rhetoric from the very beginning, but I had a bigger problem with you tried to insinuate that all the violent rhetoric you posted came from the left, when in reality most of it came from the right.

The reason it took me weeks to actually address the violent rhetoric is because for weeks you refused to admit that your violent rhetoric you posted was not all from the left.

Face it, we all just saw in here that you don't actually care about violent rhetoric as long as it's not against Trump. If you did, you'd have posted about it when someone said it to AOC. But you didn't.

---

That convo is buried 2 pages back.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

Only once I confronted you about it. Had I not, you never would have brought it up. And I had a problem with the violent rhetoric from the very beginning, but I had a bigger problem with you tried to insinuate that all the violent rhetoric you posted came from the left, when in reality most of it came from the right.

The reason it took me weeks to actually address the violent rhetoric is because for weeks you refused to admit that your violent rhetoric you posted was not all from the left.

Face it, we all just saw in here that you don't actually care about violent rhetoric as long as it's not against Trump. If you did, you'd have posted about it when someone said it to AOC. But you didn't.

---

again you fail to understand and get the point that this is the AOC thread. I brought up something wrong AOC said, in the AOC thread, and you were too busy getting pissy about me. that is your problem, you are too obsessed with me and don't bother paying enough attention to the content of what is going on.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

again you fail to understand and get the point that this is the AOC thread. I brought up something wrong AOC said, in the AOC thread, and you were too busy getting pissy about me. that is your problem, you are too obsessed with me and don't bother paying enough attention to the content of what is going on.

---

I understand the point of the AOC thread, it's to discuss all things AOC.

Are you saying someone who uses violent rhetoric against AOC and compares her to Genocide has nothing to do with AOC?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

I understand the point of the AOC thread, it's to discuss all things AOC.

Are you saying someone who uses violent rhetoric against AOC and compares her to Genocide has nothing to do with AOC?

---

it sucks having to keep repeating myself. I wanted to highlight how she was wrong about something, and you're still relentless in deflecting to something else. I'm not arguing in circles here, if you have nothing to say about AOC being wrong in dropping white supremacist then don't bother.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

it sucks having to keep repeating myself. I wanted to highlight how she was wrong about something, and you're still relentless in deflecting to something else. I'm not arguing in circles here, if you have nothing to say about AOC being wrong in dropping white supremacist then don't bother.

---

I know what you wanted to highlight. You wanted to attack AOC. Because that's all you care about. This whole thread to you is a "how much AOC sucks". So when someone says something bad about AOC, you ignore it, just like you ignored it when someone compared her to Genocide.

I just wasn't gonna play along with your "she's a horrible person" routine, especially after you ignored something you had a day earlier claimed you cared about no matter who it was from or against.


Now you can continue with your "AOC sucks" regularly scheduled programming.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

I know what you wanted to highlight. You wanted to attack AOC. Because that's all you care about. This whole thread to you is a "how much AOC sucks". So when someone says something bad about AOC, you ignore it, just like you ignored it when someone compared her to Genocide.

I just wasn't gonna play along with your "she's a horrible person" routine, especially after you ignored something you had a day earlier claimed you cared about no matter who it was from or against.


Now you can continue with your "AOC sucks" regularly scheduled programming.

---

people should be able to discuss on topic, but not you because you are obsessed with me. this is disturbing. you are the one that went on for weeks without calling out rhetoric, but now want to bring up me when I did call it out against AOC when I first had the chance. hypocrite, you waited weeks, you're trolling.

I've said before it should not be this hard to be on topic, and the topic I brought up is ignorance from a radical Democrat. that was the topic that I brought up, don't butwhatabout something else.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

people should be able to discuss on topic, but not you because you are obsessed with me. this is disturbing. you are the one that went on for weeks without calling out rhetoric, but now want to bring up me when I did call it out against AOC when I first had the chance. hypocrite, you waited weeks, you're trolling.

I've said before it should not be this hard to be on topic, and the topic I brought up is ignorance from a radical Democrat. that was the topic that I brought up, don't butwhatabout something else.

---

The topic of the thread is AOC. I will ask for the third time since you have yet to answer:

Are you saying someone using violent rhetoric and comparing AOC to Genocide has nothing to do with AOC?

Yes or no.


Not to mention, the violent rhetoric was literally in the tweet you posted. How is it not on topic to comment on a tweet you actually posted? The topic wasn't how terrible AOC is, it was the tweets you posted. How is me commenting on a tweet you posted not on topic?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

The topic of the thread is AOC. I will ask for the third time since you have yet to answer:

Are you saying someone using violent rhetoric and comparing AOC to Genocide has nothing to do with AOC?

Yes or no.


Not to mention, the violent rhetoric was literally in the tweet you posted. How is it not on topic to comment on a tweet you actually posted? The topic wasn't how terrible AOC is, it was the tweets you posted. How is me commenting on a tweet you posted not on topic?

---

It's only on topic if you're bashing AOC...isn't that obvious?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

I covered something AOC said that I thought was important. you alone I think should be someone to support this one thing she said that was wrong. racism is a problem in America and someone shouldn't abuse the word for a political agenda.

---

---

nobody said/should say that an Asian can't be racist. but how can someone Asian be a white supremacist?




I actually did say something about the attack on AOC. you have posted in this thread so you should know this.

---

Her response wasn’t great but she has every right to be absolutely pissed about the video. While your intention in posting that may have been to try and show how stupid AOC is, all it’s really accomplished is to highlight how low the GOP stoops to attack anyone that speaks out against them. This was an attack on AOC and what we’re discussing in 100% on topic. If you don’t want to discuss that then just move on. Honestly, some of these attacks on her are completely ridiculous like gardening thing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

nobody said/should say that an Asian can't be racist. but how can someone Asian be a white supremacist?

---

Nobody said that either lol. Your entire forced temper tantrum here is rooted in extremely poor reading.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

The topic of the thread is AOC. I will ask for the third time since you have yet to answer:

Are you saying someone using violent rhetoric and comparing AOC to Genocide has nothing to do with AOC?

Yes or no.


Not to mention, the violent rhetoric was literally in the tweet you posted. How is it not on topic to comment on a tweet you actually posted? The topic wasn't how terrible AOC is, it was the tweets you posted. How is me commenting on a tweet you posted not on topic?

---

I have already acknowledged that what was done against AOC was wrong. my intent in posting about her was her stupidity, yet you continue to butwhatabout something else. if you want to bring up the violent rhetoric and genocide then go ahead and drop that in the other thread.

---

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bramaca

Her response wasn’t great but she has every right to be absolutely pissed about the video. While your intention in posting that may have been to try and show how stupid AOC is, all it’s really accomplished is to highlight how low the GOP stoops to attack anyone that speaks out against them. This was an attack on AOC and what we’re discussing in 100% on topic. If you don’t want to discuss that then just move on. Honestly, some of these attacks on her are completely ridiculous like gardening thing.

---

no doubt she has a right to be pissed. I already said it was wrong. but it was stupid of her to bring up something about racism and white supremacy. that was stupid. that is the typical default that you get from Democrats that want to blame anything on race. the very thing she is accusing Republicans of doing is what she is doing for the Democrat base. it's a strategy to impact people.
AOC could have objected without dropping racism/white supremacy and I could have supported that.

---

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by browski234

Nobody said that either lol. Your entire forced temper tantrum here is rooted in extremely poor reading.

---

there was no reason to bring up racism or white supremacy. AOC did that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

I have already acknowledged that what was done against AOC was wrong. my intent in posting about her was her stupidity, yet you continue to butwhatabout something else. if you want to bring up the violent rhetoric and genocide then go ahead and drop that in the other thread.

---

There it is. We finally get to the root of it. Your only intention in this thread is to talk about how stupid she is. Forgive us if we don't all go along.

It is kind of hard to ignore how stupid she is.

And has anyone noticed that she has been less vocal since her chief of staff…the Chewbacca guy or whatever his name was… has left. He was the guy pulling her strings.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sluggo1

It is kind of hard to ignore how stupid she is.

And has anyone noticed that she has been less vocal since her chief of staff…the Chewbacca guy or whatever his name was… has left. He was the guy pulling her strings.

---

Ask Trump supporters how they do it, they are especially good at ignoring how stupid someone is.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

Ask Trump supporters how they do it, they are especially good at ignoring how stupid someone is.

---

Just wait until, if she follows my advice, and stays in the House rather than go to the Senate or some other office. She could be Speaker some day.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

There it is. We finally get to the root of it. Your only intention in this thread is to talk about how stupid she is. Forgive us if we don't all go along.

---

there it is? valade16 I have already said this. you really should pay better attention.

:shrug:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

again you fail to understand and get the point that this is the AOC thread. I brought up something wrong AOC said, in the AOC thread, and you were too busy getting pissy about me. that is your problem, you are too obsessed with me and don't bother paying enough attention to the content of what is going on.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

it sucks having to keep repeating myself. I wanted to highlight how she was wrong about something, and you're still relentless in deflecting to something else. I'm not arguing in circles here, if you have nothing to say about AOC being wrong in dropping white supremacist then don't bother.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

I've said before it should not be this hard to be on topic, and the topic I brought up is ignorance from a radical Democrat. that was the topic that I brought up, don't butwhatabout something else.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

again, in the AOC thread. what part of this is hard to understand. I addressed what she said, what she was wrong about, in the thread about her.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

I didn't mention it in the beginning because I thought what Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez said was more deserving of the attention, again in the Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez thread.

I will also say again that I know nothing about Khmer Rouge so I don't know the comparison. hard for me to talk about what was as bad or not when I know literally nothing about whatever that is. but do think what AOC said was wrong, and that alone should have people in agreement. she brought up white supremacist in something that was done by an Asian woman.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

the intent on why I posted it was not about that, again, in the AOC thread where my intent was for it to be about AOC.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

my true intentions, again in Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez thread. no **** that was my intention, I literally said that.

---

when someone says something stupid whether it's AOC or President Trump, that should be discussed. too often PSD doesn't want to call out stupidity from the left, and this entire thread has examples of that. there is overwhelming evidence in this thread to support that AOC has said something stupid.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

Ask Trump supporters how they do it, they are especially good at ignoring how stupid someone is.

---

I have called Trump stupid in multiple different situations.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

there it is? valade16 I have already said this. you really should pay better attention.

:shrug:

when someone says something stupid whether it's AOC or President Trump, that should be discussed. too often PSD doesn't want to call out stupidity from the left, and this entire thread has examples of that. there is overwhelming evidence in this thread to support that AOC has said something stupid.

---

At least your honest about being a partisan hack. Doesn't make you any less of one though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

At least your honest about being a partisan hack. Doesn't make you any less of one though.

---

if I'm a partisan hack then why have I also said Trump has said things that were stupid. you quoted my post that literally said "whether it's AOC or President Trump."

more often I'm going to support Republicans/Conservatives, but I'm not against everything Democrat/Liberal. when I do post something supportive of the left it doesn't get replies and is instead ignored.

if you don't have anything to say about AOC abusing the words racist/white supremacist, then you're wasting your time.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

if I'm a partisan hack then why have I also said Trump has said things that were stupid. you quoted my post that literally said "whether it's AOC or President Trump."

more often I'm going to support Republicans/Conservatives, but I'm not against everything Democrat/Liberal. when I do post something supportive of the left it doesn't get replies and is instead ignored.

if you don't have anything to say about AOC abusing the words racist/white supremacist, then you're wasting your time.

---

Because if someone compared Trump to genocide there is no way you'd be focusing on Trump's response. You'd have talked about how comparing Trump to Genocide was wrong.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

Ask Trump supporters how they do it, they are especially good at ignoring how stupid someone is.

---

Right.

Some 60 million people supported Trump while this other idiot wins an election where her party leader said a "glass of water could win in that district."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dbroncos78087

Just wait until, if she follows my advice, and stays in the House rather than go to the Senate or some other office. She could be Speaker some day.

---

And you're OK with that.

I don't agree with a lot about Pelosi but she is a smart woman who knows what she is doing.

People like AOC are stupid. As mentioned numerous timews, she's a college graduate that couldn't get a job better than bartended.

And you can't cure stupid.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sluggo1

And you're OK with that.

I don't agree with a lot about Pelosi but she is a smart woman who knows what she is doing.

People like AOC are stupid. As mentioned numerous timews, she's a college graduate that couldn't get a job better than bartended.

And you can't cure stupid.

---

AOC is what 28-29 years old. I know plenty of people at that age that aren't using their college degree for the career they thought they would have. People are often surprised (shocked even) when they find out that I am using mine.

So I disagree 100% that she is stupid. She isn't stupid. You don't like her politics and are conflating the two incorrectly.

Oh and you say that she couldn't get a better job than as a bartender...I'd say she got a decent job...it's called Congresswoman.

Pelosi, knows what she is doing? The last time she was the leader of the house, democrat lost a crapload of national and state seats. That is why, republicans like working with her.

Get out her out the leadership of the house

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

Because if someone compared Trump to genocide there is no way you'd be focusing on Trump's response. You'd have talked about how comparing Trump to Genocide was wrong.

---

Chief Liz Warren genocides my boner. I say we Trail of Tears her right back to Oklahoma.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by flea

Chief Liz Warren genocides my boner. I say we Trail of Tears her right back to Oklahoma.

---

Chief Wahoo thing still pissing you off, eh?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dbroncos78087

AOC is what 28-29 years old. I know plenty of people at that age that aren't using their college degree for the career they thought they would have. People are often surprised (shocked even) when they find out that I am using mine.

So I disagree 100% that she is stupid. She isn't stupid. You don't like her politics and are conflating the two incorrectly.

Oh and you say that she couldn't get a better job than as a bartender...I'd say she got a decent job...it's called Congresswoman.

---

No, she is stupid. She doesn’t know a thing about politics


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Brewersfan255

No, she is stupid. She doesn’t know a thing about politics

---

I did not know that it was possible that you could sink any further, but, jeez, now you are taking your talking points from Sluggo! You are in it deep.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

Because if someone compared Trump to genocide there is no way you'd be focusing on Trump's response. You'd have talked about how comparing Trump to Genocide was wrong.

---

you mean what has basically already happened over and over and over.
if I was to talk about that then I would do that in an appropriate thread, not the (now locked) WTF did Trump say thread.

the part you bold doesn't even match with what you said. you can't call me a partisan hack (or blind Trump supporter) when I don't support Trump on everything and have called out stupid things he has said.

---

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Crovash

I did not know that it was possible that you could sink any further, but, jeez, now you are taking your talking points from Sluggo! You are in it deep.

---

there is enough evidence in this thread to back up that AOC is stupid.