Printable View
No. Half of it classifies as the worst one. Would you do me a favor and pick the best one?Quote:
Originally Posted by dbroncos78087
Would it be paying those who choose not to work, providing free healthy food to everyone, single payer, free college, stopping foreclosures on those that don't pay their bills, distribution of taxes,.....
Listen, there are good things on this deal. However, the idiotic things make on the extreme ridiculous side.
Grandpas triggered again
Nice input. Get off my lawn.Quote:
Originally Posted by FlakeyFool
I would say that attempting to build more resiliently in areas that are going to be effected by flooding is a good place to start.Quote:
Originally Posted by dbroncsinmo
I'm trying to be an honest broker here. Just give me what you think the worst one is to start.
No you're not. You're trying to make it look like I don't know what's in the deal. You never change.Quote:
Originally Posted by dbroncos78087
Ok, to stroke your ego let's start with paying those who willingly choose not to work.
After that, let's discuss eliminating air travel. Think about that for one second.
After that, let's discuss requiring to upgrade your homes windows to triple pain before being allowed to put your house on the market.
After that let's talk about forgiving all foreclosures.
And I'm not even broaching the health insurance, living wages for all, eliminating private health insurance, and the main point, complete government control over everyone and everything.
Feel free genius, let me know your thoughts on these.
If AOC would replace my cars with Tesla 3s she'd get my vote. But if she's going to do it for all of us she needs to find 10 quadrillion dollars ... but maybe she can negotiate a discount with Elon.
Might want to start with buildings as wellQuote:
Originally Posted by Scoots
The "Green New Deal" should "be accomplished through a 10-year national mobilization that will require,” among other things, “upgrading all existing buildings in the United States and building new buildings to achieve maximal energy efficiency, water efficiency, safety, affordability, comfort, and durability, including through electrification,” the nonbinding resolution states.
"upgrade all existing/build new"
Is she going to pay for this out of her own pocket or is she oblivious? EVERY home has to be updated. The hell is this?
i have a neighbor who has four cars. Is she going to pay for his new electric cars? if so, give me one too. And I want AOC to pay for mines directly from her bank account.
https://apps.npr.org/documents/docum...New-Deal-FINAL
this girl is nuts. And whoever sponsoring this legislation with her is nutty as well.
What are your specific critiques?Quote:
Originally Posted by FlashBolt
LolQuote:
Originally Posted by ManRam
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Already happening on a small scale in California.Quote:
Originally Posted by FlashBolt
. Ommmmm.Quote:
Originally Posted by FlashBolt
And therein lies part of the problem.Quote:
Originally Posted by FlashBolt
That would be half of the current Dem candidates for President.Quote:
Originally Posted by FlashBolt
Why? If his neighbor is a single person they are probably not driving multiple vehicles at the same time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Crovash
The majority of miles driven in the US are because regulation has made housing more expensive where there is work, so people live further from work to afford housing and need to drive to get there.
Encourage telecommuting. People congregating to an office is so outdated with current technology anyways. So few jobs need an actual office setting. And even those that do, can usually cut those that need to actually be there by 80%.Quote:
Originally Posted by Scoots
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Wait regulation is why it’s more expensive? A lot of time it’s regulations that cap living areas. I always thought it was pesky capitalist supply and demand that made housing expensive.Quote:
Originally Posted by Scoots
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk