Originally Posted by
IndyFan
No offense, but this is totally wrong. At least at the high school/middle school/elementary level. Tenure is not a protection from being fired, it is a protection from being fired without cause. If a school system really wants to get rid of a teacher because that teacher is doing a poor job of teaching or managing the classroom, they can. They just have to follow due process and document what went wrong, what was done to fix it and why that didn't work. Schools can get rid of bad teachers if the principal wants to do the work.
What schools can't do is get rid of teachers just because they feel like it. Things like making too much money, giving the school board member's kid a bad grade, losing too many football games, not starting the right students on the basketball team, being too active in the teacher's association or [this happened at my school] having too messy a classroom.
Schools would be plantations without protections like tenure.
That said, you can probably find some examples, mostly in NYC schools, of school systems not being able to fire teachers for seemingly stupid reasons. Most, if not all, of those examples are not tenure related, but the result of local collective bargaining and have nothing to do with the concept of tenure.
FWIW, k-12 schools do not have 'tenure'. Teachers are classified as non-permanent, semi-permanent or permanent. Perhaps a distinction without a difference, but tenure is a word with specific meaning that doesn't apply outside of college, I think.