So you think it would have been better to make college more affordable when it cost less? Or did you just point that out to avoid answering the question? At least Brewers responded to the question.
Printable View
If you do a little research you'll notice that things like financial aid and government backed loans have allowed colleges to jack tuition to unbelievable levels.
http://time.com/4472261/college-cost-history/Quote:
In 1944, when President Franklin Roosevelt signed the G.I. Bill of Rights, he guaranteed that qualifying veterans would receive a free year of college—meaning up to $500 a year. ($6,800 today.) In the years that followed World War II, philanthropic donations to American colleges were up, but so were costs. Tuitions had been raised “to the limit,” TIME noted, in places like the University of Pennsylvania, where students were charged $600 in 1950 (nearly $6,000 today). By 1960, with enrollment surging, even more money was needed, and a major tuition hike was forecast. That year, college costs surveyed by TIME included $2,015 for tuition, room and board, and fees for a year at Bates, and $1,450 for Lewis and Clark. (That’s $16,400 and $11,800 today.)
These days, the average cost for a year at a four-year college ranges from $9,410 for in-state public tuition to $32,410 for private. Neither of those figures include room and board. But, in general and at many specific places, costs are far higher: just looking at a few of the colleges surveyed by TIME over the years, Vassar these days costs $52,320 for a year’s tuition, and Bates is $64,500 for tuition, room and board and fees.
I'm familiar with inflation. Do you know what happens when the government offers an unlimited supply of credit?
I was being cute. They play a lot of games with tuition that are ******. My daughters money from the school decreases with every scholarship she wins. I don’t think it has as much effect as you think though. New 2018 Malibu 21k base model. Same roughly 10x increase.
If a cheap new car was $2000 grand in 1960 and tuition was $2000. Then that same model car(biscayne then) is 20k now and tuition at state school is 10k I’d say loans and grants have driven prices down. At least in any math I’ve ever done. Private schools today are misleading because no one actually pays full tuition. My daughters school costs 56000 a year and every kid that goes gets 22000 from the school.
Instead of using a specific model car or your daughter you can use actual averages but you won't because they don't support your claim.
I paid out of state and only graduated 8 years ago and tuition has almost doubled already. I can link you an inflation calculator if you'd like.
Since you're giving the economic lesson do me a favor and answer my previous question. What happens when the government provides an unlimited supply of credit?
https://www.businessinsider.com/this...ce-1980-2015-7Quote:
In his op-ed, Alexander neglects to address a major topic in college affordability discussions: ballooning tuition costs. College tuition has seen massive tuition increases in the past 30 years, growing disproportionately to other consumer goods.
The below chart using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics shows the growth in the price of a college education compared to the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for all consumers.
The average annual increase in college tuition from 1980-2014 grew by nearly 260% compared to the nearly 120% increase in all consumer items.
In 1980, the average cost of tuition, room and board, and fees at a four-year post-secondary institution was $9,438, according to the Department of Education. That number has since climbed to $23,872.
I would expect drastic inflation, which is why I said I was being cute. Reread your citation and realized my numbers were off. I read the prices adjusted for inflation as today’s prices. I was wrong. Still not as high as I would expect, and id be shocked if anyone is giving vassar 60k. My daughter would have paid 22k at vassar. I have the paperwork in front of me.
If that’s what you think what you think that’s cool. I’m genuinely curious. I know a lot of people that have gone to private schools and they never actually paid near what the tuition costs were. Literally every kid that goes to my daughters school gets the “presidential” scholarship. All of the private schools she applied to had a similiar type of scholarship. I’d be happy to just brag(doesn’t need to be humble)about my daughter, but she’s really the only firsthand experience that I have. I was an athlete with kid(s), they found all the money I needed when I went.
Is there a reason to discuss the cost of private education when someone is talking about public education being tuition free? We already have that for K-12 and if there are those who think their child would be better off they can always access private options. They will be expected to pay for that option the same they would for private college under any free tuition plan for public college.
My quip aside, I actually do agree that prices are out of control. So yes, lets intervene and bring things back into order.
Going back to the old days would just reduce the availability for people to go. That's one way to reduce the demand. But then you have a stupid population that can't compete on a global scale. That's not a way to handle this.
The path forward is pretty clear and it involves government regulation/negotiation. If we make it free for the deserving, we've already artificially influenced the price and we won't have to worry about that having as we've already likely reached a much more inelastic point on the curve.
A uneducated population isn't a solution. And neither is what is currently going on. So what do you propose?
troll harder Walter_White.
I have shown examples of both face of and face for. the point remains the same, she continues to get pushed as the shiny new toy that they think will make a difference.
there have been others including Conservative women that want to debate her, but she doesn't want to debate with them either.
Today’s student aid crisis has its roots in the 1980s. In 1981, the Reagan administration, with a coalition of congressional Republicans and conservative Democrats, pushed through Congress a combination of tax- and budget-cutting measures.
No federal program suffered deeper cuts than student aid. Spending on higher education was slashed by some 25 percent between 1980 and 1985. In raw dollar figures, cuts totaled $594 million in student assistance and $338 million in Pell grants. Students eligible for grant assistance freshmen year had to take out student loans to cover their second year. For middle-class families, eligibility was changed as well. Low-cost, low-interest, subsidized federal loans were limited to families with household incomes of less than $32,000, regardless of family size.
Effectively, these changes shifted the federal government’s focus from providing students higher education grants to providing loans.
When the government backs student loans colleges can just keep hiking tuition and it's exactly what happened. Something very similar happened with the housing market.
Liberals care, they just underestimate their ability to make things worse while trying to fix a problem.
Ding, Ding, the liberals are the problem, let's go for the triple crown of those who messed up this country, black leaders.
Lol government has been veering hard right for decades with the exception of on social issues.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Did you just completely ignore all of the data from the articles I've posted? Have any familiarity with the consumer price index? Because if you're arguing cost is the same you're ****ing hopeless.