I love the last line of sarcasm
Printable View
Both are good for investment and diversifying is the way to go IMO. Buy a house you can live in and it will gain value over time as you do so. Invest in the stock market with the rest of your available savings/investment $. Over time odds are both will gain value and if housing or stock market explode you will be ready to benefit either way.
The market has been exploding, I have no idea where you live or what you are talking about but in general many people are making a ton of $ on their housing investments with the market very hot. As with anything, including stocks, you can always choose a bad investment of course. This is probably more likely in some areas than others and should be considered when making the purchase/investment. Over time both houses and stocks increase on average though with stocks actually being more variable but generally a bit better return on average as well.
You can literally take the difference in cost between renting and owning a home and put it into the stock market... Even in a safe market like the S&P and make a better return then on owning a house.
It's funny how many of you claim to be well off and yet know next to nothing about investing.
Oh and I'd suggest to stop "believing" and start doing math. Much more effective when investing.
https://www.businessinsider.com/robe...t-a-fad-2013-2
This guy is the ****.
You can does not mean you will. The issue with stocks for many is the variability, it is much easier to lose on your investment. This can be person dependent and it might work for you but not everyone is capable of understanding the market and doing things correctly. If you rent and your initially stock investments are bad what do you have now? Not much. Most people end up making less than the average as it pertains to stock and many even end up losing. It is just riskier especially with human emotion/decision making involved.
With a house you can end up with a mortgage/taxes similar to renting in the area (so monthly your expenses are similar), have a roommate paying you to live there each month (you now are gaining an extra say 700/month to invest in stocks anyways), and the investment will also be growing over time as well.
It really depends what you are looking for at the end of the day. Either strategy can work but that's why I noted it is often best to diversify imo.
Again over the last 20 years it's been rough. Housing prices have not returned all the way to 2001 prices yet. And certainly not the annual returns that real estate has offered in the past.
It used to be buy more than you can afford because of the money one will make. That is no longer true.
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/20-...0two%20decades.
At the turn of the century, the average U.S. home value was $126,000. Today, that figure is at a record high $259,000 a 106% increase in just two decades.
https://dqydj.com/historical-home-prices/
This one shows median prices as well and to start 00 it was at $131,674.47 while 12/1/20 was $300,986.69
Even adjusting for inflation it was still much higher as well.
Sure but if we're looking at things purely from a return from investment point of view houses are ****.
Houses should be looked at as a purchase. Not an investment.
Again if someone wants to start a family and own a home more power to them. But if you're only buying a house because you think it's some great financial investment you're wasting your money.
This is ridiculous I have already shown how they can be an investment, that they also work as a valuable purchase to live in isn't a negative.
You are absolutely not wasting your money by buying a house and having it increase in value over time while also gaining rent $ as well in the process.