Yes, someone comparing her to Genocide is about her. Are you saying that comparing AOC to genocide has nothing to do with AOC?
Printable View
So in any thread about Trump you always post about what dumb crap comes out of his mouth in response to what someone else says or does about him? Everyone here, including you, knows that’s complete ********. This is a poor deflection as to why you didn’t address the attack on AOC.
I covered something AOC said that I thought was important. you alone I think should be someone to support this one thing she said that was wrong. racism is a problem in America and someone shouldn't abuse the word for a political agenda.
nobody said/should say that an Asian can't be racist. but how can someone Asian be a white supremacist?
I actually did say something about the attack on AOC. you have posted in this thread so you should know this.
I know you thought that was important. But in another thread, literally days before you posted this about AOC, you claimed that violent rhetoric, from any side, was important. So it seems odd if you find that so important that you would post a story where someone uses violent rhetoric against AOC and make no mention of the violent rhetoric until you were called out.
Only once I confronted you about it. Had I not, you never would have brought it up. And I had a problem with the violent rhetoric from the very beginning, but I had a bigger problem with you tried to insinuate that all the violent rhetoric you posted came from the left, when in reality most of it came from the right.
The reason it took me weeks to actually address the violent rhetoric is because for weeks you refused to admit that your violent rhetoric you posted was not all from the left.
Face it, we all just saw in here that you don't actually care about violent rhetoric as long as it's not against Trump. If you did, you'd have posted about it when someone said it to AOC. But you didn't.
again you fail to understand and get the point that this is the AOC thread. I brought up something wrong AOC said, in the AOC thread, and you were too busy getting pissy about me. that is your problem, you are too obsessed with me and don't bother paying enough attention to the content of what is going on.
it sucks having to keep repeating myself. I wanted to highlight how she was wrong about something, and you're still relentless in deflecting to something else. I'm not arguing in circles here, if you have nothing to say about AOC being wrong in dropping white supremacist then don't bother.
I know what you wanted to highlight. You wanted to attack AOC. Because that's all you care about. This whole thread to you is a "how much AOC sucks". So when someone says something bad about AOC, you ignore it, just like you ignored it when someone compared her to Genocide.
I just wasn't gonna play along with your "she's a horrible person" routine, especially after you ignored something you had a day earlier claimed you cared about no matter who it was from or against.
Now you can continue with your "AOC sucks" regularly scheduled programming.
people should be able to discuss on topic, but not you because you are obsessed with me. this is disturbing. you are the one that went on for weeks without calling out rhetoric, but now want to bring up me when I did call it out against AOC when I first had the chance. hypocrite, you waited weeks, you're trolling.
I've said before it should not be this hard to be on topic, and the topic I brought up is ignorance from a radical Democrat. that was the topic that I brought up, don't butwhatabout something else.
The topic of the thread is AOC. I will ask for the third time since you have yet to answer:
Are you saying someone using violent rhetoric and comparing AOC to Genocide has nothing to do with AOC?
Yes or no.
Not to mention, the violent rhetoric was literally in the tweet you posted. How is it not on topic to comment on a tweet you actually posted? The topic wasn't how terrible AOC is, it was the tweets you posted. How is me commenting on a tweet you posted not on topic?