Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

08-17-2021, 09:06 AM
SpecialFNK

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crovash

Have some sympathy. The poor fellow was banned. It must have been excruciating for him to have this critical issue festering like an open sore for those many weeks.

I was eligible to return from the ban August 7th and only say this news after that, so no this did not bother me before I even saw it.
08-17-2021, 09:06 AM
SpecialFNK

Quote:

Originally Posted by WES445

He and Sluggo got that AOC fever. When they see or hear her name their blood pressure goes up, their faces turn purple, and out comes the spew. Yup, classic case of the AOC fever. I think a Trumpster die from it last spring up around upper Idaho

comical that this same logic could be used for the left always triggered at right wingers like Taylor Green and Boebert. if they or AOC say something stupid as they do, it doesn't matter who they are or what side they are on.

multiple people commenting on stupidity from Boebert in the pulling out thread, they must be triggered and unhinged too I guess.. or more likely LB said something stupid and it's called out.
08-17-2021, 10:03 AM
Crovash

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

comical that this same logic could be used for the left always triggered at right wingers like Taylor Green and Boebert. if they or AOC say something stupid as they do, it doesn't matter who they are or what side they are on.

I for one have never commented on either Greene or Boebert (though there has been plenty of reason for me to do so), but that is beside the point in question — a classic conservative/Special whattabout which is, as always, totally irrelevant.

Here’s the bottom line: You have the audacity and, frankly, the inhumanity to question the legitimate concern of a young woman who for better or worse is a major (and sadly for losers like you, a polarizing) public figure — concern for her own safety during a documented and extremely violent incursion on her own workspace.
08-17-2021, 12:10 PM
SpecialFNK

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crovash

I for one have never commented on either Greene or Boebert (though there has been plenty of reason for me to do so), but that is beside the point in question — a classic conservative/Special whattabout which is, as always, totally irrelevant.

Here’s the bottom line: You have the audacity and, frankly, the inhumanity to question the legitimate concern of a young woman who for better or worse is a major (and sadly for losers like you, a polarizing) public figure — concern for her own safety during a documented and extremely violent incursion on her own workspace.

this is about her reach of fearing RAPE, not fearing for her life. there has been nothing at all to show that she was reasonable in fearing rape. she didn't even mention this fear until July, months since January.
08-17-2021, 12:51 PM
Crovash

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

this is about her reach of fearing RAPE, not fearing for her life. there has been nothing at all to show that she was reasonable in fearing rape. she didn't even mention this fear until July, months since January.

Like I said - with this obsession of yours you are taking a position that suggests strongly that you are bereft of those essential ingredients that give coherence, meaning even, to a civilized society.
08-17-2021, 01:01 PM
valade16

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

she can fear being in danger and not directly be in danger.
I showed someone wanted to harm her, even if they didn't get close to her.

I don't think she was in direct danger as nobody was close to getting her, but I can understand her fear since that was a reality.

let me know if anyone that day said they wanted to rape her.

I’m glad you at least admitted she was in danger, even if not in direct danger (the distinction being worth nothing).
08-17-2021, 01:22 PM
valade16

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

but her feeling one way doesn't mean she was in danger.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

nobody has been able to provide that AOC was actually in danger.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

she wasn't in danger.

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

I said she was never in any real danger.

This was you before. Look at how hard your argued for a position that was incorrect. Why do it again?
08-17-2021, 03:14 PM
Kenny Powders

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

this is about her reach of fearing RAPE, not fearing for her life. there has been nothing at all to show that she was reasonable in fearing rape. she didn't even mention this fear until July, months since January.

Were you at the Capitol on January 6th?

Sent from my Pixel 5 using Tapatalk
08-17-2021, 03:18 PM
Kenny Powders

Imagine if you told special on January 5th that a bunch of Trump supporting terrorists were going to lay siege to the Capitol, build a gallows for the VP and chant "HANG MIKE PENCE. That couldn't happen, right?

Sent from my Pixel 5 using Tapatalk
08-17-2021, 03:25 PM
SpecialFNK

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crovash

Like I said - with this obsession of yours you are taking a position that suggests strongly that you are bereft of those essential ingredients that give coherence, meaning even, to a civilized society.

when I see someone who has gotten this level of media attention as AOC has gotten, and she says something stupid yet again that deserves to be criticized, I have no problem calling that out.

how many of PSD left were just as "obsessed" with negative **** that Trump was doing and saying as President, who I remind people I myself called out as well.
08-17-2021, 03:25 PM
SpecialFNK

Quote:

Originally Posted by valade16

I’m glad you at least admitted she was in danger, even if not in direct danger (the distinction being worth nothing).

Quote:

Originally Posted by valade16

This was you before. Look at how hard your argued for a position that was incorrect. Why do it again?

I stand by everything I've said. the person that got close to AOC was there to help her.

let me try and be clear. AOC was not in direct danger or even in general danger.
how many politicians were harmed?

she could have been in danger had anyone got close to her, but that didn't happen. still as I said I understand her fear of being harmed.

even then that would be danger to be harmed since people arrested/charged that wanted to harm her. nobody arrested/charged said they wanted to rape her, she not only reached for that, she only did so months after the incident. that itself should be telling, she waited months to come out and say she felt fear of being raped. come on, she's playing the victim and people are buying it.
08-17-2021, 03:27 PM
SpecialFNK

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kenny Powders

Imagine if you told special on January 5th that a bunch of Trump supporting terrorists were going to lay siege to the Capitol, build a gallows for the VP and chant "HANG MIKE PENCE. That couldn't happen, right?

Sent from my Pixel 5 using Tapatalk

their temper tantrum did nothing, changed nothing about the election.

these imbeciles are given too much credibility by media.
08-17-2021, 03:40 PM
metswon69

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

I stand by everything I've said. the person that got close to AOC was there to help her.

let me try and be clear. AOC was not in direct danger or even in general danger.
how many politicians were harmed?

she could have been in danger had anyone got close to her, but that didn't happen. still as I said I understand her fear of being harmed.

even then that would be danger to be harmed since people arrested/charged that wanted to harm her. nobody arrested/charged said they wanted to rape her, she not only reached for that, she only did so months after the incident. that itself should be telling, she waited months to come out and say she felt fear of being raped. come on, she's playing the victim and people are buying it.

You're dying on a dumb hill. Let it go. The risk of physical danger doesn't just consist of assault or murder. The fact is you have no idea what their intentions were had they came in physical contact with these politicians. These were the same people who wanted to hang Mike Pence. Those things are cool but rape is completely off the table (when most of the assailants were middle aged men).

Do you listen to yourself sometimes?
08-17-2021, 03:54 PM
Kenny Powders

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

their temper tantrum did nothing, changed nothing about the election.

these imbeciles are given too much credibility by media.

Ok........

Sent from my Pixel 5 using Tapatalk
08-17-2021, 04:05 PM
valade16

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

I stand by everything I've said. the person that got close to AOC was there to help her.

let me try and be clear. AOC was not in direct danger or even in general danger.
how many politicians were harmed?

she could have been in danger had anyone got close to her, but that didn't happen. still as I said I understand her fear of being harmed.

even then that would be danger to be harmed since people arrested/charged that wanted to harm her. nobody arrested/charged said they wanted to rape her, she not only reached for that, she only did so months after the incident. that itself should be telling, she waited months to come out and say she felt fear of being raped. come on, she's playing the victim and people are buying it.

Why do you understand her fear of being harmed if she wasn’t in any danger? If she wasn’t in danger, why should she have been afraid?

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page