the random numbers you all choose to show President Trump as limiting legal immigration is quite funny.
Printable View
the random numbers you all choose to show President Trump as limiting legal immigration is quite funny.
I thought people understood the use of quotation marks.Quote:
Originally Posted by ewing
you put them around what someone said, that is quoting them.
Do you have any random numbers that show legal immigration increased or held steady under Trump?Quote:
Originally Posted by brett05
Point missedQuote:
Originally Posted by valade16
They're not random. They are what is publicly available and easy to present. If you aim to say that they aren't an appropriate proxy, that's fine and an argument you can make. But I would advise, if you wish to be taken seriously and not laughed out of the room, you present numbers that contradict what's posted.Quote:
Originally Posted by brett05
So noQuote:
Originally Posted by brett05
You lied here and repeatedly when you said you were only against illegal immigration. I can forgive the one timer but if you want any respect you should say “I’m sorry” to everyone for misrepresenting your views on immigration for such a long period of timeQuote:
Originally Posted by SpecialFNK
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Pretty sure this is a violation of the magical and gloried rules of public debate from Brett, first edition of course.Quote:
Originally Posted by valade16
If that was the point, of course. However, it's not.Quote:
Originally Posted by dbroncos78087
I don't ever remember saying I'm only against illegal immigration.Quote:
Originally Posted by ewing
I support legal immigration and going about it the right way. I have pushed this for years now, arguing about the proper procedure for asylum and what would or would not make one qualified.
even with legal immigration there should be a limit. it's not a free for all, this isn't like in the past when America had a lot of free land to just give away to new people.
I never lied about what AOC said, I quoted her exact words using quotations.
You do not support legal immigration and going about it the right way. In this thread, you are telling people in life threatening situations who are going about it the right way to not come. Going about it the right mean they come to a port of entry.Quote:
Originally Posted by SpecialFNK
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sure you might be in incredible danger, but just stay there for another decade or so while we work out the logistics...you can stay alive that long. Right?Quote:
Originally Posted by ewing
I remember when this all started we were told Trump was only going to start deporting dangerous illegals from the US, then it was anyone who had broken a law beyond coming here illegally, then it was well they all need to go. But of course what they wanted to do didn't actually shift, they wanted to get rid of them all to begin with, they just hid their true beliefs.Quote:
Originally Posted by ewing
The same thing here. First it was we only want to stop illegal immigrants from getting in. Then it was we need to stop all these refugees. Now it's well we need to drastically reduce the number of immigrants getting in regardless of how. Which of course was their belief all along.
President Trump, then candidate, was always about removing all illegal immigrants.Quote:
Originally Posted by valade16
it's not accurate to say everyone rushing the border is in a life threatening situation. if that was true then there would be no need to have requirements for asylum, they would all be qualified. except that is not the case.Quote:
Originally Posted by ewing
anyone entering between a port of entry is not doing it the right way.