Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

I could have sworn the title of this thread was Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. :shrug:

---

Yeah, and you’re creepily demonizing her for...(standard normal human being) stuff you have no issue with Trump doing, even worse lol.

Btw who did you vote for?

Dang, on CNN just said Georgia going to have to rejudicate 100k votes!

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by nastynice

Dang, on CNN just said Georgia going to have to rejudicate 100k votes!

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

---

Meaning?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sick Of It All

Meaning?

---

https://www.gwinnettdailypost.com/lo...a702e8a28.html

Lmao

Georgia once again.

Broken water-mane.
Machine errors.
Whole districts with power outage.
8 hour lines for early voting.

It’s ****ing ridiculous now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sick Of It All

Meaning?

---

No idea, just wanted to use the word rejudicate.

They were using it like it ain't nothing, lol
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by browski234

Yeah, and you’re creepily demonizing her for...(standard normal human being) stuff you have no issue with Trump doing, even worse lol.

Btw who did you vote for?

---

I'm not demonizing her, maybe should should pay better attention.

I said she deserves to be criticized, and I said the same thing for Trump.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

which one during covid19 has pushed harder to help American families, who has talked more about people not being able to afford their rent?

if Trump did this and then did something to contradict that he too would deserve to be criticized.

---

but you want to criticize her because a fashion magazine asked her to wear the outfit they provided just for the picture

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SiteWolf

but you want to criticize her because a fashion magazine asked her to wear the outfit they provided just for the picture

---

..based on the message that she has already established in her effort to help those who can't even afford rent during this pandemic. that is all connected.

AOC gets to wear expansive clothing while the people that she supports have no chance at doing the same thing. she comes out against the rich, and here she is doing something that only rich people could afford.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

..based on the message that she has already established in her effort to help those who can't even afford rent during this pandemic. that is all connected.

AOC gets to wear expansive clothing while the people that she supports have no chance at doing the same thing. she comes out against the rich, and here she is doing something that only rich people could afford.

---

Well she’s not rich and she did it, so apparently more than the rich can do it.

She also won her district handedly. Nobody cares except her haters.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

..based on the message that she has already established in her effort to help those who can't even afford rent during this pandemic. that is all connected.

AOC gets to wear expansive clothing while the people that she supports have no chance at doing the same thing. she comes out against the rich, and here she is doing something that only rich people could afford.

---

This is completely not an issue, but if it were there are worse offenders than her. It's a bit pathetic that you've been crying about this for a week.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

Well she’s not rich and she did it, so apparently more than the rich can do it.

She also won her district handedly. Nobody cares except her haters.

---

she didn't buy anything, she was offered clothes to wear for a magazine. how many people that support her are going to have the same opportunity?

most people wearing expensive clothes for a photoshoot is no issue at all, but those people are not pushing hard to help people people less fortunate that can't even afford rent, and that has been my issue.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

she didn't buy anything, she was offered clothes to wear for a magazine. how many people that support her are going to have the same opportunity?

most people wearing expensive clothes for a photoshoot is no issue at all, but those people are not pushing hard to help people people less fortunate that can't even afford rent, and that has been my issue.

---

And her being on the cover of the magazine helped amplify her message to better help the less fortunate.

Your issue is that you don’t like her. There is no issue here. Literally nobody cares but her haters.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

And her being on the cover of the magazine helped amplify her message to better help the less fortunate.

Your issue is that you don’t like her. There is no issue here. Literally nobody cares but her haters.

---

I never said I don't like her. I've even said that I think she's attractive.

I don't agree with things she says/wants.

you didn't answer the question. how many people that support her are going to have the same opportunity? or afford the same type of clothing? the answer is likely none.

I think she had a great opportunity, but she did this instead. it wasn't really wrong of her, I just think it makes her hypocritical. it is what it is.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

she didn't buy anything, she was offered clothes to wear for a magazine. how many people that support her are going to have the same opportunity?

most people wearing expensive clothes for a photoshoot is no issue at all, but those people are not pushing hard to help people people less fortunate that can't even afford rent, and that has been my issue.

---

the next time any of them are asked to do a cover shoot for Vanity Fair, I guarantee the magazine would do the same for them....so they're not treating her any different than they'd treat them

but I'm sure they'd respect her more if she was struggling to make rent