Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dbroncsinmo

Benny is the incoherent drunk bad *** right now. Ignore the dude. Can't win an argument when the one you're arguing with is in that state of mind.

Just walk away. Lol. People leaving literature on his door step. Think he's confusing white supremacists with his nearby church faculty.

---

Patriot front. I could believe you attend church there. It’s what Jesus would do, amirite.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Brewersfan255

What the hell are you talking about? That article was nothing. Antifa shouted and attacked people who went to Shapiro’s speech in Berkeley. Three people were arrested for bribing weapons and attacking a police officer. These are facts.

None of your garbage opinion pieces will change that


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

They brought signs with sticks.

These are weapons

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2015/11/27/man-who-led-armed-protest-at-texas-mosque-publishes-list-of-muslims-home-addresses/?utm_term=.79e4cb8dc1fe

Here’s your boy Shapiro

https://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2014/nov/05/ben-shapiro/shapiro-says-majority-muslims-are-radicals/

And his outlet

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-daily-wire/

So you do think he’s dangerous enough that it’s ok for them to bring violence at a speech?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by benny01

They brought signs with sticks.

These are weapons

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.79e4cb8dc1fe

Here’s your boy Shapiro

https://www.politifact.com/punditfac...-are-radicals/

And his outlet

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-daily-wire/

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Brewersfan255

So you do think he’s dangerous enough that it’s ok for them to bring violence at a speech?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

There is another thread for this argument.

By the way, Ms. Orcasio-Cortez is skyrocketing in the polls.

Yep Shapiro can say that stuff and lose no listeners. That’s why she has nothing to gain and everything to lose. His constituency is clueless and racist bigots who want certain groups bashed relentlessly. The best she can do is correct a few baseless facts. That would be a win in the post fact landscape.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dbroncos78087

Yep Shapiro can say that stuff and lose no listeners. That’s why she has nothing to gain and everything to lose. His constituency is clueless and racist bigots who want certain groups bashed relentlessly. The best she can do is correct a few baseless facts. That would be a win in the post fact landscape.

---

Again I have no problem with her saying no to Ben. The problem I have is that she pulled out the sexist card right away. She should have said no or just ignored it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Brewersfan255

Again I have no problem with her saying no to Ben. The problem I have is that she pulled out the sexist card right away. She should have said no or just ignored it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

I agree. She had nothing to gain by debating this guy so she was right to turn him down. She also should not have pulled the sexist card


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

She was wrong to do that, move on. In the age of Trump, we can overlook her verbal misstep. If the public thinks it is the big thing you believe it is, they will correct it at the polls.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Brewersfan255

Again I have no problem with her saying no to Ben. The problem I have is that she pulled out the sexist card right away. She should have said no or just ignored it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

---

Ok fair. Tell me, what would you have thought if she said "I do not have to debate him"? Not elaborating any further.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WES445

I love that Trump's supporters have been reduced to being haters and bashers. They have moved from Hillary and Obama to AOC. So that is something.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WES445

I really don't care, like you don't care that Trump calls the Press the enemies of the people. So, your point is moot, since I never attack Trump for that statment.

---

what is this supposed to mean in this thread?

there is one side that has continually been outraged at how Trump is so mean to the press. now here we have someone actually banning the press, and these same people do not care. that is the entire point. that is hypocritical.

---

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FlakeyFool

-aoc

---

how do you think people would react if President Trump (or any Republican) gave the same reason for banning the press. they would be outraged.

---

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dbroncos78087

He has banned the press. But he’s the president and she’s a candidate for one house seat.

---

all press? show me. I'm not talking about specific individuals, she banned all press.



if Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez had banned specific press that had more of a hateful agenda against her, then I could see people explaining why she had a reason to do that. that is not what happened here.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

all press? show me. I'm not talking about specific individuals, she banned all press.



if Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez had banned specific press that had more of a hateful agenda against her, then I could see people explaining why she had a reason to do that. that is not what happened here.

---

Has all press been banned from all events or one specific event?

You are so easy to ignore.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WES445

You are so easy to ignore.

---

Big time. Someone should post the definition of context for him because he clearly doesn’t understand it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WES445

You are so easy to ignore.

---

Lol. The intent of your post is completely contradicted by it's content.

With this lady, the right has truly found their next boogie man!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk