Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Brewersfan255

I’m pretty sure they evacuated and told everyone to hide in the entire area

---

They did. Almost as if they believed they were all in danger…

If you gave an order that Santiago wasn't to be touched, and your orders are always followed, then why would Santiago be in danger? Why would it be necessary to transfer him off the base?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by browski234

If you gave an order that Santiago wasn't to be touched, and your orders are always followed, then why would Santiago be in danger? Why would it be necessary to transfer him off the base?

---

You want answers?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

You keep coming at this from the perspective of what the cop thought based on what was going to happen. In some of those situations people can act out of nowhere and shoot the cop, but this wasn’t one of those cases. Again, we KNOW Castile was not reaching for his gun or was going to shoot the cop. We know that. So the cop was fearful of something that wasn’t going to happen because of what happened in similar situations.


The same is true of AOC. Many situations similar to that end up with someone like her getting raped, it was a reasonable fear even if it wasn’t going to happen.

You keep saying not comparable because you have no argument for why it isn’t, because it is.

And now you continuing to lie and say Castile may have had an intention to shoot the cop when we KNOW he didn’t is intellectually dishonest.

---

you can't say that because the officer did not know that himself. that is what the officer felt/thought in the moment when being face to face with the person that said he had a gun.

we know after the fact that Castile was not reaching for the gun, which is easy to say when the incident is over.

nowhere did I say Castile had that intention, I said I did not know. easy to say after the fact, but not in the heat of the situation right in front of the officer.

find me evidence to show that AOC was reasonable to have fear of being raped.

AOC had a reason to be afraid of this, and this is evidence..

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/23/polit...tez/index.html

Quote:

---

Capitol rioter charged with threatening to 'assassinate' Rep. Ocasio-Cortez

---

Quote:

---

The Justice Department revealed new charges against a Texas man who allegedly participated in the Capitol attack and posted online death threats against Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and a US Capitol Police officer.

---

https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...blicans-death/

Quote:

---

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez says she feared GOP lawmakers would lead rioters to her: ‘I thought I was going to die’

---

AOC has gone from being fearful of her life, to now playing up the victim more and now dropping rape.

go ahead and find me evidence like this for why AOC could fear being raped.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

you can't say that because the officer did not know that himself. that is what the officer felt/thought in the moment when being face to face with the person that said he had a gun.

we know after the fact that Castile was not reaching for the gun, which is easy to say when the incident is over.

nowhere did I say Castile had that intention, I said I did not know. easy to say after the fact, but not in the heat of the situation right in front of the officer.

find me evidence to show that AOC was reasonable to have fear of being raped.

AOC had a reason to be afraid of this, and this is evidence..

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/23/polit...tez/index.html




https://www.washingtonpost.com/natio...blicans-death/



AOC has gone from being fearful of her life, to now playing up the victim more and now dropping rape.

go ahead and find me evidence like this for why AOC could fear being raped.

---

Yes I can because again, we KNOW Castile wasn’t going to do any of things. What the cop thought is irrelevant to whether it was actually going to happen.

You are lying and being disingenuous, so I won’t be responding further with anything of substance until you acknowledge that regardless of what the cop thought, Castile wasn’t planning on shooting him.

Pretty insane that Soecial is arguing “because the cop thought Castile might shoot him it was reasonable to fear it” while simultaneously arguing “just because AOC thought they might rape her is not a valid reason to fear it” while thinking he’s consistent.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

Yes I can because again, we KNOW Castile wasn’t going to do any of things. What the cop thought is irrelevant to whether it was actually going to happen.

You are lying and being disingenuous, so I won’t be responding further with anything of substance until you acknowledge that regardless of what the cop thought, Castile wasn’t planning on shooting him.

---

not at the time. the officer did not know at the time or he would have acted differently. the officer would not have said don't reach for it then if he knew what Castile was going to do. why would he repeat multiple times DON'T REACH if he KNEW? he didn't know, stop it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

Pretty insane that Soecial is arguing “because the cop thought Castile might shoot him it was reasonable to fear it” while simultaneously arguing “just because AOC thought they might rape her is not a valid reason to fear it” while thinking he’s consistent.

---

the officer was directly facing the person he knew had a gun, show me the same for AOC.

I just provided someone wanting to hurt AOC, nothing at all about rape. AOC is reaching based on something that was not there and those that think she is wonderful are buying it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SpecialFNK

the officer was directly facing the person he knew had a gun, show me the same for AOC.

I just provided someone wanting to hurt AOC, nothing at all about rape. AOC is reaching based on something that was not there and those that think she is wonderful are buying it.

---

I will say, I'm glad you fruitlessly tried to argue this point because you did post evidence that someone wanted to harm AOC so she was in danger, which you actually argued she wasn't initially.

Do you now agree AOC was in danger that day?

It's August 16th FNK. January was so long ago. How is this still something that bothers you so much? I'm not surprised it's the one thing you care about. The one takeaway from everything. But yeah. It's OK to move on.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ManRam

It's August 16th FNK. January was so long ago. How is this still something that bothers you so much? I'm not surprised it's the one thing you care about. The one takeaway from everything. But yeah. It's OK to move on.

---

Have some sympathy. The poor fellow was banned. It must have been excruciating for him to have this critical issue festering like an open sore for those many weeks.

He and Sluggo got that AOC fever. When they see or hear her name their blood pressure goes up, their faces turn purple, and out comes the spew. Yup, classic case of the AOC fever. I think a Trumpster die from it last spring up around upper Idaho

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WES445

He and Sluggo got that AOC fever. When they see or hear her name their blood pressure goes up, their faces turn purple, and out comes the spew. Yup, classic case of the AOC fever. I think a Trumpster die from it last spring up around upper Idaho

---

I haven't commented once on this current line of discussion yet you feel the need to comment on me.

So who is really obsessed here???

Mirror mirror,

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by valade16

I will say, I'm glad you fruitlessly tried to argue this point because you did post evidence that someone wanted to harm AOC so she was in danger, which you actually argued she wasn't initially.

Do you now agree AOC was in danger that day?

---

she can fear being in danger and not directly be in danger.
I showed someone wanted to harm her, even if they didn't get close to her.

I don't think she was in direct danger as nobody was close to getting her, but I can understand her fear since that was a reality.

let me know if anyone that day said they wanted to rape her.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ManRam

It's August 16th FNK. January was so long ago. How is this still something that bothers you so much? I'm not surprised it's the one thing you care about. The one takeaway from everything. But yeah. It's OK to move on.

---

this rape nonsense is only new, never came out before her recently saying this.
AOC didn't move on, she brought this up just recently.

it's not the one thing I care about, I've posted other things. I even posted something about false accusations of racism including a recent story about the Rockies mascot Dinger, but nobody wanted to talk about that.
https://forums.prosportsdaily.com/sh...5#post34056665