https://twitter.com/jaketapper/statu...395919873?s=21
Printable View
Devastating
A true American hero
BTW If you thought the **** Mitch pulled against Obama was bad, just watch these next 45 days.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
RIP
Sadly now all the work she was part of will be gone because Trump and McConell will add a new SCJ by next month, those two guys along with the gop extremist are giggling with glee at the fact that they can put somebody that will vote with them 100% of the time.
****.
They will have somebody pushed through by the end of October.Quote:
Originally Posted by GGGGG-Men
McConnel does not give a ****, he is salivating right now at the fact that he gets to push another judge through.
It’s up a handful of republicans that can say no and hold off, but aside from Romney it ain’t going to happen.
I ****ing knew it
Mitch McConnel about the show the world how big a piece of **** he is
If Moscow Mith tries to push a SC judge with 47 days till election. Biden needs to come out and say if I win the election and Dems win the Senate I will pack the court with liberals.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sick Of It All
Umm, he's not going to do that anyway?Quote:
Originally Posted by lamar2006
****'s really going to hit the fan now. If he nominates a woman I guess they'll use the racist angle rather than the sexual predator angle.
Yeah, those dirty Democrats! I'm assuming you give zero ****s about McConnell appointing a SC Justice 45 days before an election when he refused to appoint one almost a year before an election for Obama?Quote:
Originally Posted by fingerbang
Republican rules say he not allowed to appoint anyoneQuote:
Originally Posted by fingerbang
https://media1.tenor.com/images/ea45...itemid=5515498Quote:
Originally Posted by valade16
Schumer said something like that if this happened.Quote:
Originally Posted by lamar2006
So yes their is a possibility that if McConnell allows it, that they will try to add another 2 liberal judges.
What a shocker.Quote:
Originally Posted by fingerbang
I think this just woke all the timid liberals who were passively supporting Biden. Mitch tries to pull a stunt it will backfire on him. Romney, Murkowski need to stand up and fight by stating they will not support any nominee until the new election. But if Trump loses and Republicans still approve a nominee in December/January Biden has no choice but to stack the SC with 3-4 new liberal justices. Forgot all the past norms. Trump has eradicated that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sick Of It All
I wonder where Collins will be since she seems fond of playing good and bad cop at the same time.
In fact, I really, really hope they do it considering they tried to paint the last nominee as a gang rapist with the help of an obvious bs artist. I'd LOVE to see them squirm.Quote:
Originally Posted by valade16
Collins does not give a ****, if she lost, she will surely say **** to all and vote whoever in.Quote:
Originally Posted by lamar2006
Be honest: you hope they do it because you despise Liberals and anything that pwns them, you support.Quote:
Originally Posted by fingerbang
Ted Cruz, please. Yes, I know he doesn’t want the SCOTUS job. It’s just my preference.
He can pull up a seat right next to Harry Reid....Quote:
Originally Posted by rhino17
Famously not a judgeQuote:
Originally Posted by Jack the Ripper
Yea, that's what I just said, lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by valade16
That's exactly what I was thinking when I took a glance at Trump's potential appointee list.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack the Ripper
I don't believe the Rs could get it done before the election, nor should they....Quote:
Originally Posted by GGGGG-Men
Technically doesn't have to be. For competence, they probably should be. But we know competence is literally the last thing they will consider for this selection.Quote:
Originally Posted by rhino17
What or how could they be stopped? I don't see how a Justice isn't confirmed before the election.Quote:
Originally Posted by corralski
Yes, fingerbang hates anything resembling character, ethics, or basic human decency. That's basically his MO on here.Quote:
Originally Posted by valade16
Republicans will ram through a justice and use their fraudulent court to stop mail-in votes from being counted --> Trump "wins".
takes 4-6 weeks for a background check. senate judiciary hearings, senate debate. No SC will be approved before the election. After the election in the lame duck session very possible R's try to push in the nominee before January 20.Quote:
Originally Posted by valade16
they wont be able to before election. But they'll do it right after.Quote:
Originally Posted by valade16
And Biden should immediately start stacking the bench
Jeanine Pirro would definitely piss them off. I'd be cool with that. The dems would get some guy off the sidewalk and pay him 1,000 bucks to say she called him the n word in in 1975.
Are you 5?Quote:
Originally Posted by fingerbang
That is an insult to all 5 year olds.Quote:
Originally Posted by rhino17
Are you counting time until the election or until inauguration?Quote:
Originally Posted by valade16
The Dems could put up enough roadblocks to stop this and everyone knows this. I fully expect that they would, it's why the voters in their states elected them....
Please don't insult 5 years olds like that.Quote:
Originally Posted by rhino17
Speaking of five year olds I think the democrats are currently pushing for them to get voting rights. :laugh:Quote:
Originally Posted by lamar2006
You have no moral high ground regarding a SC nomination after the Blasey Ford stunt.
What roadblocks could they put up? I genuinely don't know of any tools they can use that would prevent this from happening.Quote:
Originally Posted by corralski
What bench? the SC will be 6-3.Quote:
Originally Posted by rhino17
And you have no moral high ground considering you'd still have supported Kavanaugh even if there was irrefutable proof of his guilt...Quote:
Originally Posted by fingerbang