PDA

View Full Version : Brandon Jennings or Nate Robinson



c.c.
07-22-2013, 02:13 PM
I just read the article about Nate Robinson's feelings about still being unsigned and it made me think about the Brandon Jennings situation. Both are scoring PG's with a similar game, so who would you roll the dice and gamble on.

COOLbeans
07-22-2013, 02:17 PM
Jennings is a better point guard

Dee_Edge
07-22-2013, 02:19 PM
Jennings is six years younger...so Brandon.

JLynn943
07-22-2013, 02:21 PM
Depends on what the team needs. Nate is going to be (or at least should be) playing in the 6th man role, while Jennings is looking to start. If I've got an opening on the bench and am in need of a PG, I'd look to Nate most likely since he should be cheaper and shouldn't have a problem with that role.

c.c.
07-22-2013, 02:22 PM
Jennings is a better point guard

Yeah he makes terrible decisions at times but I think he's underrated and the kid is only 23. He has plenty time to development

MiamiBoy77
07-22-2013, 02:26 PM
nate rob is willing to be energy off bench. jennings wants to be a star. Nate Rob for me.

ManRam
07-22-2013, 02:27 PM
I think it depends on team need. I'd probably lean towards Robinson because I'd imagine he'd be cheaper. I think Jennings still has the ability to get better and redeem his career to some extent. But still, I wouldn't wanna gamble much on him.

c.c.
07-22-2013, 02:31 PM
Depends on what the team needs. Nate is going to be (or at least should be) playing in the 6th man role, while Jennings is looking to start. If I've got an opening on the bench and am in need of a PG, I'd look to Nate most likely since he should be cheaper and shouldn't have a problem with that role.

I think Orlando is a good fit for Jennings right now. As far as Nate goes, I'd say to any team that lacked of bench scoring or scoring period last year.

MonroeFAN
07-22-2013, 02:38 PM
I mean, Jennings has the potential of being a difference maker over Robinson.

But this isn't an easy question to answer. I mean, Nate at 2-4 per, or Jennings at 8-10. I think I would rather Nate.

NYKnickFanatic
07-22-2013, 02:41 PM
Right now, Nate. For the future Jennings.

Nate is a guy that can help your team right now. His energy and competitiveness is out of this world. I don't see any fire in Jennings like I do in Nate.

Here is a nice little head to head of them, Nate lighting him up.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DFL6EiLz9Y

Hellcrooner
07-22-2013, 02:41 PM
Robinson, he knows what he is ( a role player) instead of thinking he is the second coming of Jesús.

MonroeFAN
07-22-2013, 02:42 PM
I think it's hilarious that this question is being asked, and that Jennings is seeking a star like contract while Nate is struggling to find a roster spot.

What a joke Brandon Jennings is.

NYKnickFanatic
07-22-2013, 02:43 PM
I mean, Jennings has the potential of being a difference maker over Robinson.

But this isn't an easy question to answer. I mean, Nate at 2-4 per, or Jennings at 8-10. I think I would rather Nate.

Replace Nate with Jennings, how do the Bulls in the playoffs?

tp13baby
07-22-2013, 02:43 PM
Nate Rob. As a Denver fan good back up. Why would I pay Jennings more than my current starting point guard that is clearly much better.

Pierzynski4Prez
07-22-2013, 04:58 PM
Id rather have Nate at 2-5 mil over Jennings at 9-12 mil.

Sly Guy
07-22-2013, 06:00 PM
nate rob is willing to be energy off bench. jennings wants to be a star. Nate Rob for me.

pretty much how I'd sum it up too.

NYYCowboys
07-22-2013, 06:07 PM
Robinson. First of all he had a better year than Jennings hands down last year stats-wise. Secondly he knows his role as a bench player, while Jennings will jack up 20 shots a game because he thinks he's a star. Not even close in my opinion.

b@llhog24
07-22-2013, 06:07 PM
Jennings aspires to be more than what he actually is (a more expensive version of Nate Robinson). Since at pont, they're probably comparable in production and talent (Nate is insanely gifted athletically); cost to production ratio comes into effect. So Donkey it is.

I Rock Shaqs
07-22-2013, 06:14 PM
Nate can fit on any team in the league where Jennings can't, also Nate Robinson is a better team mate then Jennings and a better defender.

AddiX
07-22-2013, 06:18 PM
Lol I brought up this comparison, and I'm going with Nate.

Fact: Nate is better at everything. Bj isn't better in one aspect of the game. And Nate is funny too, doesn't take his "swag" so serious.

+1 Nate

scott46
07-22-2013, 07:26 PM
Brandon Jenning is the closes thing the Bucks hav to a all star and basiclly the only chance the have to both sell tickts and win. Monta Ellis, JJ. Reddick left town like there was a hurricane katrina. All stars and elite players and coaches want no part of this team. This organization satistically is at the bottom of the barrel. Jennings has basically no help, while Sanders and Illosova are pretty good, they are far from being all stars... Having said all of this, Jennings is not worth 12 million dollars a year. Give him three years at 10 million a year, last year team option.

Guppyfighter
07-22-2013, 08:10 PM
Jennings is a good pick for losing.

JasonJohnHorn
07-22-2013, 09:45 PM
Nate is a solid role player who can provide a big spark some nights while being a bit of a liability other nights. Jennings is bad every night.

MrfadeawayJB
07-22-2013, 09:49 PM
Based in contracts, Robinson easily

TheMightyHumph
07-22-2013, 09:55 PM
Jennings has not impressed me at all.

Thought from the start of the off season that Bucks should just let BJ & Monta go. They just don't seem like winners.

So obviously I pick the hustling vet, Nate.