PDA

View Full Version : Rising Stars - Team Shaq VS Team Chuck



Laces-Out
02-15-2013, 01:43 AM
Team Shaq

Damian Lillard Portland Trail Blazers
Kyrie Irving Cleveland Cavaliers
Andre Drummond Detroit Pistons
Klay Thompson Golden State Warriors
Harrison Barnes Golden State Warriors
Chandler Parsons Houston Rockets
Dion Waiters Cleveland Cavaliers
Michael Kidd-Gilchrist Charlotte Bobcats
Tyler Zeller Cleveland Cavaliers
Kemba Walker Charlotte Bobcats

Team Chuck

Anthony Davis New Orleans Hornets
Kenneth Faried Denver Nuggets
Kawhi Leonard San Antonio Spurs
Bradley Beal Washington Wizards
Ricky Rubio Minnesota Timberwolves
Tristan Thompson Cleveland Cavaliers
Nikola Vucevic Orlando Magic
Brandon Knight Detroit Pistons
Isaiah Thomas Sacramento Kings
Alexey Shved Minnesota Timberwolves

Vinny642
02-15-2013, 02:15 AM
Give me Chuck's team, support my dude AD

RipCity32
02-15-2013, 02:41 AM
No Drummond should even things up a little more now.

sixer04fan
02-15-2013, 02:58 AM
Am I crazy or is Team Shaq superior to Team Chuck? Kyrie, Drummond, Klay, Parsons, Lillard... Chuck's got Rubio, Davis, Faried, Vuc... But come on... I'm taking Team Shaq all day!

lol, please
02-15-2013, 03:09 AM
Team Shaq in a blowout.

sixer04fan
02-15-2013, 03:12 AM
Team Shaq in a blowout.

That's what I'm thinking.

JOhnnyTHaJet
02-15-2013, 03:22 AM
Whos gettin boards on team Shaq??

GrandDaddyPurp
02-15-2013, 03:54 AM
This post was made today but the rosters are not updated. Drummond is out. Insert Andrew Nicholson - Orlando Magic.

#TeamChuck wins btw in a blowout.

Chuck Taylor
02-15-2013, 07:37 AM
Shaq

CavsYanksDuke
02-15-2013, 07:48 AM
Am I crazy or is Team Shaq superior to Team Chuck? Kyrie, Drummond, Klay, Parsons, Lillard... Chuck's got Rubio, Davis, Faried, Vuc... But come on... I'm taking Team Shaq all day!

This guy got it.

tmacsc2
02-15-2013, 08:15 AM
Team Shaq, these games are all about the guards not the big men! RUN AND GUN WITH LILLARD AND IRVING=GAME OVER!

Gators123
02-15-2013, 08:45 AM
Without Drummond team Shaq doesn't have any size or defense in the front court.

GrandDaddyPurp
02-16-2013, 03:21 AM
This guy got it.

Naw not really

b@llhog24
02-16-2013, 03:24 AM
If Kyrie actually played inspired basketball, team Shaq would've won.

SubZero
02-16-2013, 09:58 AM
Kenneth Faried's Highlights:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsTgHSodrpw

Kyrie Irving's Highlights:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJ0Rgh3zuE0

netsgiantsyanks
02-16-2013, 10:20 AM
people actually thought shaq's team was going to win :laugh2:

IndyRealist
02-16-2013, 10:30 AM
So here's the moral of the story:
1) Conventional wisdom said that the superfast, guard-oriented Team Shaq should have dominated this game. Because something is conventional wisdom doesn't mean that it's true. It just means that everyone believes it.
2) Rebounding matters. Even in this exhibition game each team missed 40% of their shots. Rebounds get you more shots, and keep your opponent from doing the same.
3) Kenneth Faried is not a role player. Period.

I Rock Shaqs
02-16-2013, 10:34 AM
That dunk by Dion Waiters was sick at the end and the dunks Faried was doing you can already tell he won't make it out of the first round he's a power dunker not a creative one.

Chill_Will_24
02-16-2013, 12:13 PM
That crossover on poor Knight was disgusting. He could have hurt him

wizardsfan3
02-16-2013, 12:42 PM
That crossover on poor Knight was disgusting. He could have hurt him

Knight got Kyrie twice but couldn't finish haha

valade16
02-16-2013, 01:19 PM
So here's the moral of the story:
1) Conventional wisdom said that the superfast, guard-oriented Team Shaq should have dominated this game. Because something is conventional wisdom doesn't mean that it's true. It just means that everyone believes it.
2) Rebounding matters. Even in this exhibition game each team missed 40% of their shots. Rebounds get you more shots, and keep your opponent from doing the same.
3) Kenneth Faried is not a role player. Period.

Uh Conventional wisdom says the big man would win. The axiom was "you can't win without a big man" for 40+ years not "you can't win without a PG"...

Who on earth gave you the idea conventional wisdom favored small guards?