PDA

View Full Version : Teamwork Score - Attempt at Statistic Construction



shafty
02-25-2012, 10:24 AM
This is an attempt at something that non-statisticians (me) should likely stay away from. It's not easy to lump various variables together (advanced stats) in an equation and subtract/add them in a way that is weighs correctly without going deep into the original formula and making tweaks. With that being said...

This stat is designed to show how much a player is producing points within the offense - a "teamwork" score. Not only their points, but producing points for others as well. This is done by looking at % of possessions scored while being assisted ((FGM x %AST) = ___ / TFGM), degree of assisting others in points scored (AST%), gauging how much you are using possessions for yourself (ball reference def. of USG%), and lastly, points produced per 36 minutes to show how much you are contributing with your usage (P/36). After adding/subtracting the various components, the total is divided by ten for no reason whatsoever. It's easier on the eye...

Formula: Player A scores within offense X% of possessions. Player A creates offense for others Y% of possessions. X + Y = Compatibility score. Compatibility score – USG + PTS PER36 = ____ / 10 = Teamwork score

Any comments welcome, btw.

2012 to date - Results:

KD 11.77 + 17.4= 29.17 – 31.4 = -2.23 + 26.3= 24.07/10 = 2.40
LB 8.34 + 41.8 = 50.14 – 32.6 = 26.54 + 27.1 = 53.64/10 = 5.36
CA 6.10 + 24.5 = 30.60 – 32.2 = -1.6 + 22.7 = 21.10/10.0 = 2.11
KB 12.0 + 28.2 = 40.20 – 37.9 = 2.3 + 26.9 = 29.2/10 = 2.92
DR 4.52 + 38.9 = 43.42 – 27.2 = 16.22 + 22.2 = 38.42/10 = 3.84
ME 8.07 + 27.9 = 35.97 – 30.2 = 5.77 + 21.50= 27.27/10 = 2.72
RW 5.60 + 30.6 = 36.20 – 33.3 = 2.90 + 24.3 = 27.20/10 = 2.70
SN 2.00 + 50.9 = 52.90 – 22.9 = 30 + 15.6 = 45.60/10 = 4.56
CP 3.31 + 42.4 = 45.71 – 23.4 = 22.31 + 19.1 = /10 = 4.14


you'll notice that guys like nash and cp3 are rewarded for doing an amazing job of setting others up, but when they score, they are almost always doing it alone. lebron seems to have found a perfect balance - one in which he can help others score and others help him. melo clearly has some work to do. westbrook has pretty poor numbers as well - especially for a point guard.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Data:

KD:

2012: rim - 47.9%, 3-9 ft - 25.9%, 10-15 ft - 25.0%, 16-23 ft - 43.8%, 3's - 76.1%
2011: rim - 60.8%, 3-9 ft - 41.7%, 10-15 ft - 36.6%, 16-23 ft - 64.3%, 3's - 85.5%
2010: rim - 49.8%, 3-9 ft - 27.6%, 10-15 ft - 40.3%, 16-23 ft - 54.2%, 3's - 77.3%

2012 AST%: 17.4
2011 AST%: 13.2
2010 AST%: 13.5

2012 USG%: 31.4
2011 USG%: 30.6
2010 USG%: 32.0

TFGM = 37.12 / 10.0 = 37.12 =10 x 43.7% = 4.37 assisted possessions/37.12 = 11.77%
37.12 x .174 = 6.46 possessions

Carmelo:

2012: rim - 21.5%, 3-9 ft - 25.0%, 10-15 ft - 8.70%, 16-23 ft - 23.8%, 3's - 66.7%
2011DN: rim - 51.2%, 3-9 ft - 38.1%, 10-15 ft - 24.2%, 16-23 ft - 39.1%, 3's - 90.5%
2011NY: rim - 37.5%, 3-9 ft - 33.3%, 10-15 ft - 33.3%, 16-23 ft - 38.5%, 3's - 77.4%
2010: rim - 43.9%, 3-9 ft - 19.0%, 10-15 ft - 21.9%, 16-23 ft - 36.0%, 3's - 84.7%

2012 AST%: 24.5
2011 AST%: 15.3
2011 AST%: 14.3
2010 AST%: 15.9

2012 USG%: 32.2
2011 USG%: 31.0
2011 USG%: 32.5
2010 USG%: 32.0

TFGM = 34.82 / 7.3 = 7.3 x 29.14 = 2.13 / 34.82= 6.1%
34.82 x .245 = 8.53

Kobe:

2012: rim - 44.7%, 3-9 ft - 29.8%, 10-15 ft - 31.0%, 16-23 ft - 45.6%, 3's - 55.6%
2011: rim - 39.2%, 3-9 ft - 31.4%, 10-15 ft - 22.4%, 16-23 ft - 33.3%, 3's - 65.2%
2010: rim - 43.3%, 3-9 ft - 35.9%, 10-15 ft - 25.5%, 16-23 ft - 38.5%, 3's - 63.6%

2012 AST%: 28.2
2011 AST%: 26.7
2010 AST%: 23.8

2012 USG%: 37.9
2011 USG%: 35.1
2010 USG%: 32.3

TFGM = 35.73 / 10.4 = 41.34 x 10.4 = 4.30 / 35.73= 12.0
35.73 x .282 = 10.08

Lebron:

2012: rim - 47.2%, 3-9 ft - 36.1%, 10-15 ft - 27.6%, 16-23 ft - 15.7%, 3's - 34.1%
2011: rim - 37.8%, 3-9 ft - 14.5%, 10-15 ft - 10.9%, 16-23 ft - 22.8%, 3's - 60.9%
2010: rim - 48.4%, 3-9 ft - 27.6%, 10-15 ft - 20.8%, 16-23 ft - 23.0%, 3's - 54.2%

2012 AST%: 41.8
2011 AST%: 34.9
2010 AST%: 36.1

2012 USG%: 32.6
2011 USG%: 31.5
2010 USG%: 33.5

38.52 / 10.0 = 32.14 x 10.0 = 3.214 / 38.52 = 8.34
38.52 x .418 = 16.10

Rose:

2012: rim - 19.3%, 3-9 ft - 13.0%, 10-15 ft - 17.6%, 16-23 ft - 13.8%, 3's - 45.5%
2011: rim - 23.7%, 3-9 ft - 15.6%, 10-15 ft - 15.5%, 16-23 ft - 17.3%, 3's - 59.4%
2010: rim - 34.3%, 3-9 ft - 24.0%, 10-15 ft - 20.7%, 16-23 ft - 34.0%, 3's - 56.3%

2012 AST%: 38.9
2011 AST%: 38.7
2010 AST%: 30.3

2012 USG%: 27.2
2011 USG%: 32.2
2010 USG%: 33.5

TFGM = 37.66 / 7.8 = 21.84 = 1.70 / 37.66 = 4.52
37.66 x .389 = 14.65

Monta:

2012: rim - 44.2%, 3-9 ft - 5.90%, 10-15 ft - 22.7%, 16-23 ft - 33.3%, 3's - 78.9%
2011: rim - 39.1%, 3-9 ft - 18.5%, 10-15 ft - 27.8%, 16-23 ft - 35.4%, 3's - 65.7%
2010: rim - 35.4%, 3-9 ft - 24.5%, 10-15 ft - 20.9%, 16-23 ft - 31.9%, 3's - 67.5%

2012 AST%: 27.9
2011 AST%: 23.4
2010 AST%: 21.2

2012 USG%: 30.2
2011 USG%: 28.1
2010 USG%: 29.4

TFGM = 37.6 / 8.2 = 37.0 = 3.03 / 37.6 = 8.07
37.6 x .279 = 10.49

Westbrook:

2012: rim – 23.9%, 3-9 ft – 17.9%, 10-15 ft – 10.7%, 16-23 ft – 14.7%, 3's – 45.8%
2011: rim - 21.2%, 3-9 ft – 12.2%, 10-15 ft – 7.20%, 16-23 ft – 11.9%, 3's – 29.4%
2010: rim – 19.8%, 3-9 ft – 19.1%, 10-15 ft – 14.3%, 16-23 ft – 14.8%, 3's – 69.6%

2012 AST%: 30.6
2011 AST%: 42.7
2010 AST%: 38.6

2012 USG%: 33.3
2011 USG%: 31.6
2010 USG%: 25.7

TFGM = 37.12 / 9.2 = 22.6 = 2.079 / 37.12 = 5.60
37.12 x .306 = 11.36

Nash:

2012: rim – 13.0%, 3-9 ft – 0.00%, 10-15 ft – 0.00%, 16-23 ft – 18.3%, 3's – 36.4%
2011: rim – 7.70%, 3-9 ft – 7.10%, 10-15 ft – 5.90%, 16-23 ft – 14.6%, 3's – 32.1%
2010: rim – 6.90%, 3-9 ft – 3.10%, 10-15 ft – 0.00%, 16-23 ft – 8.80%, 3's – 26.6%

2012 AST%: 50.9
2011 AST%: 53.1
2010 AST%: 57.7

2012 USG%: 22.9
2011 USG%: 21.4
2010 USG%: 21.1

TFGM = 36.44 / 5.4 = 13.54 = 0.73 / 36.44 = 2.00
36.44 x .509 = 18.55

CP3:


2010: rim – 10.1%, 3-9 ft – 2.90%, 10-15 ft – 2.00%, 16-23 ft – 8.20%, 3's – 40.4%
2011: rim – 12.9%, 3-9 ft – 9.70%, 10-15 ft – 13.8%, 16-23 ft – 11.6%, 3's – 47.9%
2012: rim – 13.7%, 3-9 ft – 13.0%, 10-15 ft – 5.30%, 16-23 ft – 4.40%, 3's – 50.0%

2012 AST%: 42.4
2011 AST%: 45.8
2010 AST%: 45.4

2012 USG%: 23.4
2011 USG%: 21.1
2010 USG%: 22.2

TFGM = 36.48 / 7.0
=17.28 %AST x 7.0 = 1.21 /36.48 = 3.31