PDA

View Full Version : Cities That Should Have an NBA Team but Dont



C-Dub
10-11-2011, 05:56 PM
Self-explanatory. What cities do you think would be conveniently located for the NBA to make money and the NBA team to have a descent fan base?
Could maybe include what youd name the team if youd like ha

MrfadeawayJB
10-11-2011, 06:11 PM
Seattle

Evolution23
10-11-2011, 06:26 PM
Seattle and New Jersey real soon

Ezio
10-11-2011, 06:28 PM
ST. Louis?

Baller1
10-11-2011, 06:30 PM
Seattle.

sep11ie
10-11-2011, 06:31 PM
Pittsburgh

Raps18-19 Champ
10-11-2011, 06:33 PM
Vancouver.

AllKohn
10-11-2011, 06:36 PM
Pittsburgh

:clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:

iliketurtles24
10-11-2011, 06:38 PM
id like minnesota to have a team, they might find one soon though

PhillyFaninLA
10-11-2011, 06:40 PM
Pittsburgh, I don't agree with Seattle, when you lose a team you shouldn't be rewarded with another for a very long time.

I'd like a professional sports team to open in a city like Boise, a big to fairly big city that does not have a professional sports team, just to see what kind of market they have. Maybe Fargo, ND because they have a growing population in ND. Albuquerque, NM.

gwrighter
10-11-2011, 06:41 PM
Seattle & Van City.

Big2win
10-11-2011, 06:43 PM
Charleston, SC (Carolina Crocs)

Virginia or Richmond, VA (Virginia Venom)

quhawk11
10-11-2011, 06:47 PM
St. Louis

GoPacers33
10-11-2011, 06:57 PM
Honolulu Volcanoes :D

hgtiger32
10-11-2011, 07:02 PM
I don't think the NBA needs more NBA teams. If anything they should eliminate some.

Lucky.
10-11-2011, 07:11 PM
Tampa, St.Louis, Cincinnati,Kansas City, San Diego,San Francisco,Arizona.
Any of these I guess.

Cal827
10-11-2011, 07:14 PM
Las Vegas; might as well stay close to betting when the games are rigged :D

Chicago: They haven't had a good team since Jordan left :D.. just kidding Bulls fans.

Kansas City: Give them a team in the NBA in the NHL

save the knicks
10-11-2011, 07:18 PM
Albany NY

Baller1
10-11-2011, 07:48 PM
Pittsburgh, I don't agree with Seattle, when you lose a team you shouldn't be rewarded with another for a very long time.

I'd like a professional sports team to open in a city like Boise, a big to fairly big city that does not have a professional sports team, just to see what kind of market they have. Maybe Fargo, ND because they have a growing population in ND. Albuquerque, NM.

Study up if you're going to post about the situation, because you're way off base.

effen5
10-11-2011, 07:54 PM
Tampa, St.Louis, Cincinnati,Kansas City, San Diego,San Francisco,Arizona.
Any of these I guess.

There should be zero pro teams in Florida.

Evolution23
10-11-2011, 09:44 PM
Albany NY

I doubt there would be enough fans to fill the stadium. I mean they have college ball in syracuse which is big but I doubt a pro team would make it.

beasted86
10-11-2011, 09:48 PM
I'd like to see two of the struggling teams move to Seattle and San Diego

xbrackattackx
10-11-2011, 10:08 PM
I back the SC vote

RevisIsland
10-11-2011, 11:29 PM
Seattle Seattle Seattle Seattle Seattle and Seattle.

xbrackattackx
10-11-2011, 11:47 PM
Seattle Seattle Seattle Seattle Seattle and Seattle.

X2 bring the Sonics home. Then retire paytons jersey!

nickdymez
10-11-2011, 11:53 PM
I don't think the NBA needs more NBA teams. If anything they should eliminate some.

This... Like 4-8

mekedubs
10-11-2011, 11:59 PM
I would say Baltimore, MD... That's a great basketball city, imo...

LakersMaster24
10-12-2011, 12:01 AM
This thread is made literally every month, and we get the same answers...every month...

C-Dub
10-12-2011, 12:30 AM
whoops.
sorry. i was bored n i aint been in the nba forum in a while. its boring with no season.

OC Knights #11
10-12-2011, 01:10 AM
I don't think the NBA needs more NBA teams. If anything they should eliminate some.

The Bucks would be one of the first to go.

Wade>You
10-12-2011, 01:18 AM
- Cleveland, + Las Vegas
- LA Clippers, + Seattle

(new owners, of course).

Wade>You
10-12-2011, 01:22 AM
I don't think the NBA needs more NBA teams. If anything they should eliminate some.Completely agree on this one. Contraction would get rid of the owners that are holding the NBA and their own teams hostage.

Lakers + Giants
10-12-2011, 01:24 AM
Tijuana!

LA_Raiders
10-12-2011, 01:31 AM
Agree with St.Luis

THE GIPPER
10-12-2011, 01:35 AM
vancouver and seattle

itsripcity32
10-12-2011, 01:48 AM
Tampa, St.Louis, Cincinnati,Kansas City, San Diego,San Francisco,Arizona.
Any of these I guess.

:facepalm:
warriors have the freakn golden gate bridge as their logo

gotoHcarolina52
10-12-2011, 01:56 AM
:facepalm:
warriors have the freakn golden gate bridge as their logo

Who the heck are the Warriors? :confused:

j/k but, in all seriousness, the logo features the Bay Bridge, not the Golden Gate.

Lucky.
10-12-2011, 10:01 AM
:facepalm:
warriors have the freakn golden gate bridge as their logo

:shrug:

Mishmin
10-12-2011, 10:14 AM
Anchorage.

But for real, Cali should have no more than 2 teams.

DoMeFavors
10-12-2011, 10:18 AM
do the thunder even consider sonics apart of their history? do they talk about the greats or is the Thunder supposed to be an entire different team?

DoMeFavors
10-12-2011, 10:19 AM
a lot of players would love to play for a Las Vegas team so they can party a lot.

SpeeMN
10-12-2011, 10:28 AM
Considering Kentucky is a Huge basketball state, Louisville. And also Carolina, North and South just like in football. Raleigh or Charleston.

Kleonidas
10-12-2011, 10:33 AM
If I owned a team I would look to the Kentucky basketball crazies. Louisville, Lexington, or Cincy would work imho.

tbone2171
10-12-2011, 10:53 AM
If I owned a team I would look to the Kentucky basketball crazies. Louisville, Lexington, or Cincy would work imho.

:facepalm:

DoMeFavors
10-12-2011, 10:56 AM
:facepalm:

lol never even heard of that

TheNumber37
10-12-2011, 11:05 AM
Seattle is so depressing, they need it. Also, New Jersey is not a city. Other places: vegas. How about another team in Texas. And what about Brooklyn? How come they don't... Oh yeah :)

mamba24
10-12-2011, 11:07 AM
Tampa, St.Louis, Cincinnati,Kansas City, San Diego,San Francisco,Arizona.
Any of these I guess.

Golden state warriors are right down the street from san fran... and sacramento is about an hour and a half away from sna fran as well.. a team couldnt survive there.

and arizona isnt a city

mamba24
10-12-2011, 11:09 AM
I'd like to see two of the struggling teams move to Seattle and San Diego

I live in San Diego... While I would love to see a team here, we really can barely keep the chargers here. Their games are blocked out due to lack of attendance all the time.

Kleonidas
10-12-2011, 11:13 AM
:facepalm:

Cincinnati would be the best choice imho. Big enough city to fill the seats. Most Reds fans in Kentucky still make the trip. They would flock to their own NBA team. I would build it right over the Ohio in Kentucky. Fans would pack the place!

Abel Ye
10-12-2011, 11:30 AM
New Jersey needs a team.

Weezy
10-12-2011, 11:32 AM
Easily Seattle.

Jay
10-12-2011, 11:37 AM
Under a better CBA, Vancouver would be a viable option.

SpeeMN
10-12-2011, 12:00 PM
If I owned a team I would look to the Kentucky basketball crazies. Louisville, Lexington, or Cincy would work imho.

For those of you who don't know, Kentucky is basketball crazy. Lots and Lots of basketball gets played in that state; always a pick-up game to be played. Cincy works but its only borders kentucky. I say give it to Lexington now that I look at a map. Lex is in the middle of the state(almost) and is at the intersection of the only 2 interstate highways in the state. Cincy or Lex.

LAKERMANIA
10-12-2011, 12:27 PM
Pittsburgh, they have a team in every league except the NBA

Punk
10-12-2011, 12:35 PM
Seattle, Kansas City and Pittsburgh.


I don't think the NBA needs more NBA teams. If anything they should eliminate some.

Lol Pot calling the kettle black.

mttwlsn16
10-12-2011, 12:41 PM
Glastonbury, CT

Byronicle
10-12-2011, 12:43 PM
they should just move teams, not get anymore

Vegas, Pittsburgh

HouRealCoach
10-12-2011, 12:54 PM
Little Rock