PDA

View Full Version : Sacramento Kings Likely to Stay in Sacramento



mttwlsn16
04-23-2011, 12:50 AM
It looks like the Sacramento Kings won't become the Anaheim Royals after all -- at least not next season.

Despite speculation that the Kings had all but packed their bags for Southern California, the NBA now thinks the team will remain in Sacramento next season, according to a Los Angeles Times report Friday.

http://sports.espn.go.com/los-angeles/nba/news/story?id=6411267

good news kings fans and good news for the nba overall...kings belong in sactown

nickdymez
04-23-2011, 01:02 AM
No they dont, But they really dont belong in LA

CityofTreez
04-23-2011, 01:04 AM
I would think after the massive overflow of support, this city deserves the Kings!

So damn happy this team (may stay put).

Bruno
04-23-2011, 01:09 AM
Good. :clap:

Southern California doesn't need three teams.

northsid3r
04-23-2011, 01:26 AM
good for them

mttwlsn16
04-23-2011, 02:18 AM
No they dont, But they really dont belong in LA

cmon, im no kings fan but i remember watching bibby, christie, bobby jackson, peja, cwebb, vlade, that was a fun kings team to root for. granted im only 22, but imo the kings belong in SAC, CA

KingPosey
04-23-2011, 03:29 AM
I saw this and about **** my pants. Thank God, we deserve our team.

KingPosey
04-23-2011, 03:31 AM
No they dont, But they really dont belong in LA

Why dont they?

Baller1
04-23-2011, 04:23 AM
Good!

jimbobjarree
04-23-2011, 06:14 AM
great news

NYKalltheway
04-23-2011, 11:54 AM
It's because they used to be the KANSAS CITY Kings ;)
Or Cincinnati Royals...
Or Rochester Royals...

hotpotato1092
04-23-2011, 11:57 AM
Why isn't Seattle being discussed? Isn't that the logical destination for any NBA team that wants to move? I'd like to see the Kings stay in Sacramento, I don't want to lose the memories of those early '00 teams and Arco has proven to be a great home crowd when the team is winning, but if it's absolutely impossible to keep this team there, why give southern california a third team when Seattle doesn't have one? It makes no sense to me. In fact, I'd put Vegas, St. Louis, Kansas City and maybe even Pittsburgh above Anaheim on the pecking order for cities that should have teams.

leftymo
04-23-2011, 02:40 PM
Seattle isn't discussed b/c they couldn't keep their team. They have no intention on building an arena for a team.

So all the crying the kings announcers did at the end of the season was just for drama? ok...

Kings have some good players, with talent, but I'm not sure why they are SO bad. Their record should be better than what their talent indicates.

assisi805
04-23-2011, 02:46 PM
This makes me happy.

DerekRE_3
04-23-2011, 02:53 PM
Seattle isn't discussed b/c they couldn't keep their team. They have no intention on building an arena for a team.

So all the crying the kings announcers did at the end of the season was just for drama? ok...

Kings have some good players, with talent, but I'm not sure why they are SO bad. Their record should be better than what their talent indicates.

They started to show that talent near the end of the season. Tyreke was finally healthy, Marcus Thornton was sick, and Jason Thompson started to play some really solid ball. DeMarcus was also putting up about 15 and 10 with 4 assists a game the last 20 or so games of the year.

asandhu23
04-23-2011, 02:57 PM
Bravo! :clap: :clap: :clap: