PDA

View Full Version : Fatigue sets in, Lakers unconcerned



Purple&Gold24
04-04-2011, 04:04 AM
LOS ANGELES -- Kobe Bryant could hardly contain his laughter as the question was being asked. He looked down and simply shook his head and chuckled under his breath before the sentence could even be completed.

Are you concerned at all about the big picture after losing to the Denver Nuggets?

It took about five seconds for Bryant to contain himself before he looked up and essentially sighed his response. "No."

Bryant's relaxed attitude after the Los Angeles Lakers' season-long nine-game winning streak was snapped after a 95-90 loss to the Nuggets seemed to permeate the Lakers' locker room after the game. It was the Lakers' second loss in their last 19 games since the All-Star break and their first loss at home since Feb. 3, when the San Antonio Spurs beat them with a similar late-game tip-in.

It was almost as if the Lakers expected to drop a game sooner or later before the playoffs started, and what better time than one of these dreaded Sunday afternoon games they notoriously loathe?

When Lakers forward Ron Artest was asked about the loss, he was more concerned with his long hair than the game that had just been played.

"I think I should have just gotten a haircut, that's what it was," he said as he rubbed his head. "This is ridiculous. I was going to get a haircut yesterday; I should have just stuck to my plan and gotten a haircut. That's what I wanted to do but I was too lazy."

Artest would continue on about his ever-growing mane when pressed about the game but his claim of being too lazy wasn't too far off from explaining the Lakers' struggles in the second half. They were outscored 55-43 after halftime while the Nuggets shot 60.5 percent from the field and 50 percent from 3-point range.

"We didn't play very hard in the second half," Lakers center Andrew Bynum said. "Collectively we didn't play that hard. I just think our energy was low in the second half and that's why we lost. We had a seven-point lead and they got it back real fast."

It was an unusually lackluster second half for the Lakers, who had run away from teams late recently. They had outscored the Utah Jazz 54-37 on Friday and outscored the Dallas Mavericks 56-21 on Thursday in the second half.

Jackson was as dismissive about the Lakers' first home loss in two months as Bryant was when he was asked about the Lakers' breakdown defensively and the fact that they gave up 17 turnovers, 10 in the second half alone.

"What was the score of the game?" Jackson asked rhetorically before taking the next question.

"I told the team we beat ourselves, but it's not quite the story," Jackson said. "I think Denver is very aggressive. I thought we had a scrum out there. It turned out to be a very physical game. Denver was able to come out in the second half and shoot the ball pretty well and execute pretty good too."

Heading into the game, Jackson and his players were continually asked if they really wanted to overtake the Spurs for the top seed in the West or if they were content with staying as the No. 2 seed. The thought process behind the questions: The No. 1 seed would possibly play the Oklahoma City Thunder in the second round while the No. 2 seed would likely play the Mavericks.


"It really doesn't matter, you want to play your best basketball," Lakers forward Lamar Odom said. "Who you meet and when you meet in the playoffs, I think that's what scared teams do by positioning themselves. We're not going to run from a team not to finish first. That's what this is all about."

While the Lakers wouldn't mind finishing first in the West, they also don't think they need to finish first to win their third straight championship. Bryant has routinely swatted away questions about home-court advantage by claiming it's meaningless and simply shook his head when he was asked his thoughts on losing a game to the Spurs in the standings.

"When you look up at the banners, we don't put division titles up or things like that up, our goal is to be the best team," Odom said. "This is the time of year where we become a little bit more intense and pick up the focus and do our meditation and look to be the best."

The Lakers weren't exactly at their best on Sunday, but after they played their best basketball of the season for the previous six weeks, it didn't seem to matter to them as they left Staples Center. They feel they are exactly where they need to be heading into the playoffs whether they finish with the best overall record or not.

Before and after the game Jackson and Bryant reminisced about former Lakers assistant Tex Winter, who will finally be enshrined in the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame this year. Winter, one of the innovators of the Triangle offense, was a perfectionist who would have cringed at the Lakers' play in the second half.

"I remember after we won our second championship he came in right before we had the parade and he talked about us not making fundamentally correct chest passes," Bryant said. "He was serious and we all started laughing."

And what would Winter have said after the Lakers' loss on Sunday?

"He would have had a few choice words for all of us," Bryant said. "To say the least."
http://sports.espn.go.com/los-angeles/nba/columns/story?id=6288002

haha Tex :laugh:

shep33
04-04-2011, 04:31 AM
Yeah, this was coming. 3 games in 4 nights, we looked tired in the first half of that Jazz game. 2nd half we really buckled down with good effort... today we didn't really get that. Just looked like we couldn't. Ron and Kobe looked tired out there especially.

Seems like we had small burst of energy here and there, but 20 turnovers is uncharacteristic, and we had a lot of really dumb ones. Mistakes all over the place. This was moreso one of fatigue I think. Not trying to make excuses but I hate the timing of the Sunday afternoon games. I dunno what it is with us on Sunday afternoon, but we just come out tired and lazy.

Credit the Nuggets though, they deserved it. We had to drop one sooner or later, no way could we keep this up in the regular season for too long. Still 17-2 is pretty crazy, considering that both games we lost we actually blew a 6 and 7 point leads, with us right in both games to the very end is impressive.

Purple&Gold24
04-04-2011, 04:38 AM
I agree with you shep33, 3 games in 4 nights for our lakers was a little bit too much we almost won though. But wasnt enought. I think we do lose again it might come against the Thunder maybe.

shep33
04-04-2011, 05:09 AM
I agree with you shep33, 3 games in 4 nights for our lakers was a little bit too much we almost won though. But wasnt enought. I think we do lose again it might come against the Thunder maybe.

yeah i wouldn't be to surprised if we hit a couple road bumps until the playoffs, in reality I'm fine with the 2 seed, in a way it might actually benefit us as we don't have to play OKC in round 2 who seem to always give us fits. Not that we wouldn't beat them, I think we would, but they have the potential to extend a series against us.

We need guys healthy, and yeah the #1 seed would be great, and its still reachable, but what good is a #1 seed if guys are tired and banged up. Friday Kobe gets hit a fair amount of times, today Drew and Pau hurt their knees... in hindsight, I like how Phil just took Andrew out and didn't even think about putting him back in, we gotta protect Drew until the playoffs.

Regardless of seeding, our health is what will determine whether we win or not come playoffs.

Iron24th
04-04-2011, 10:15 AM
yeah i wouldn't be to surprised if we hit a couple road bumps until the playoffs, in reality I'm fine with the 2 seed, in a way it might actually benefit us as we don't have to play OKC in round 2 who seem to always give us fits. Not that we wouldn't beat them, I think we would, but they have the potential to extend a series against us.

We need guys healthy, and yeah the #1 seed would be great, and its still reachable, but what good is a #1 seed if guys are tired and banged up. Friday Kobe gets hit a fair amount of times, today Drew and Pau hurt their knees... in hindsight, I like how Phil just took Andrew out and didn't even think about putting him back in, we gotta protect Drew until the playoffs.

Regardless of seeding, our health is what will determine whether we win or not come playoffs.

That's exactly what I said in the game thread,some jumped on me about this,they need to look at the big picture,if Drew is hurt in playoffs,say goodbye to our threepeat...

Iron24th
04-04-2011, 10:17 AM
I agree with you shep33, 3 games in 4 nights for our lakers was a little bit too much we almost won though. But wasnt enought. I think we do lose again it might come against the Thunder maybe.

Where is Drew in your sig,he's one F important piece to our threepeat ;)

gr824
04-04-2011, 12:21 PM
Yeah, this was coming. 3 games in 4 nights, we looked tired in the first half of that Jazz game. 2nd half we really buckled down with good effort... today we didn't really get that. Just looked like we couldn't. Ron and Kobe looked tired out there especially.

Seems like we had small burst of energy here and there, but 20 turnovers is uncharacteristic, and we had a lot of really dumb ones. Mistakes all over the place. This was moreso one of fatigue I think. Not trying to make excuses but I hate the timing of the Sunday afternoon games. I dunno what it is with us on Sunday afternoon, but we just come out tired and lazy.

Credit the Nuggets though, they deserved it. We had to drop one sooner or later, no way could we keep this up in the regular season for too long. Still 17-2 is pretty crazy, considering that both games we lost we actually blew a 6 and 7 point leads, with us right in both games to the very end is impressive.

You make good points:

In reality, yesterday was actually the third game in 3.75 days, since it was a 12:30 PM tipoff after night games on Thursday and Friday. That is a lot to ask of a team at the end of a long regular season run ... Unfortunately, the Lakers face a similar stretch this week -- with plane rides interspersed as well -- when the team plays a home game on Tuesday night [ versus the Jazz ] and then hits the road on Wednesday and Friday for contests against the Warriors and the TrailBlazers, respectively ...

The Lakers have not had a double-digit winning streak in [ seemingly ] forever and the Nuggets halted their current string at nine in a row. It would be nice to think that Los Angeles can simple start another streak and finish the regular season at 61-21. However, with six games scheduled in nine days -- and half of those six on the road -- that may be asking too much, especially if Bynum, Gasol, and Bryant are anything close to as banged up as they appeared to be during/after the contest against the Nuggets. So, if the Lakers end up 60-22 -- or even 59-23 -- I would have to be satisfied that they are entering the playoff rounds with good momentum and, hopefully, as healthy as can be expected ...

As to Sunday's game, the Lakers simply were not sharp and their lack of 'precision' obviously took its toll eventually in the second half. I was not happy with the officiating at all -- neither was George Karl, though, evidently, for other reasons :eyebrow: -- but the Nuggets deserve some credit for taking full advantage of the refs' charity. The Nuggets hit enough of the windfall number of FTs [ 16-28 :speechless: ] they were given and Felton and Gallinari sank just enough 3s between them to make the difference in the final score, yet, at the same time, there is no question that bad calls going the Nuggets' way certainly accounted for more than five points in their favor and the officials' blind-eye approach to the contest definitely allowed the Nuggets to demonstrate firsthand and thoroughly why they are often called the "Thuggets" in NBA circles ...

I would hope the referees the rest of the way perform better than this crew did ... But I am not going to hold my breath while hoping ...

Purple&Gold24
04-04-2011, 04:51 PM
Where is Drew in your sig,he's one F important piece to our threepeat ;)

I agree. Just need a think name for him, any ideas?

Kobes a Killer
04-04-2011, 05:38 PM
I agree. Just need a think name for him, any ideas?

Just put Bynomite if you can't think of anything, or the anchor or something...Anchorman? I dunno

Iron24th
04-05-2011, 03:36 AM
I agree. Just need a think name for him, any ideas?

Drew :shrug: