PDA

View Full Version : Oldest Teams In League



210Don
02-01-2011, 07:22 PM
1. Heat
2. Lakers
3. Mavs
4. Nuggets
5. Celtics
6. Magic
7. Spurs
8. Suns
9. Hawks
10. Bulls
11. pistons
12. jazz
13. blazers
14. bobcats
15. bucks
16. clippers
17. hornets
18. rockets
19. cavs
20. 6ers
21. warriors
22. raptors
23. pacers
24. nets
25. wizards
26. kings
27. knicks
28. thunder
29. grizz
30. twolves
http://hoopism.com/?p=746

these are the 10 oldest in the nba the best teams are the oldest ones, theres always talk about whos old and stuff but the best teams are old, that shouldnt be a reason to fault a team.

PurpleJesus
02-01-2011, 07:25 PM
being labeled an old team can be a little misconstrued...for example, Miami is the oldest team, but the core of the team in lebron, wade and bosh are relatively young...its not as if Miami will fade shortly because they are old...they will be a good team for a long time because their core is relatively young

ragee
02-01-2011, 07:35 PM
The only reason the Heat is old is because they signed some vets to fill in the roster... Lebron, Bosh and Wade are less still a pretty young core...

nwilder
02-01-2011, 07:44 PM
hehe..Miami has the brighter and longer future among all those teams listed. They are the oldest due to the likes of Juwan Howard, Eric Dampier, Big-z who are less than likely to be on the roster next year.

Flash3
02-01-2011, 07:45 PM
someone post the youngest teams.

-Kobe24-TJ19-
02-01-2011, 07:59 PM
someone post the youngest teams.

:confused:

check the link lol

Raps18-19 Champ
02-01-2011, 08:00 PM
Surprised that Bulls are there.

Though their old people are bench players with their core being young players.

210Don
02-01-2011, 08:02 PM
really don't think it matters where your old like if your core or bench is old which ever is old has a chance of collapsing they are both big parts to a "TEAM"
but ive never seen a team fail because they are "old" but they have because of injuries. great teams that are old just fade away

Flash3
02-01-2011, 08:09 PM
:confused:

check the link lol

on my phone broseph, apparently wont let me into that link

210Don
02-01-2011, 08:12 PM
on my phone broseph, apparently wont let me into that link

ill add em i guess at my own convenience.

Baller1
02-01-2011, 09:56 PM
Only contender in the bottom half. The future is oh so bright.

kobebabe
02-01-2011, 09:58 PM
someone post the youngest teams.

LOL! Start from the bottom going up and there u got it :cool:

dhopisthename
02-01-2011, 10:09 PM
LOL! Start from the bottom going up and there u got it :cool:
lol that is what I was thinking

anyways average age a team does not mean much. What is important is how old your rotation is. Like someone said the heat are old because the have z, dampier, and howard who are all over 35 and they only have one rookie. Although it probably isn't coincidence that the of the top 7 oldest teams only one isn't competing for a championship and thats mainly cause melo messed that up

edit: also if you look at the link you notice that the list changes when he factored in age of people who get playing time

Flash3
02-01-2011, 10:15 PM
LOL! Start from the bottom going up and there u got it :cool:


on my phone broseph, apparently wont let me into that link

:eyebrow:

LongWayFromHome
02-01-2011, 10:46 PM
The minutes played really shows who the oldest / youngest are.

So the oldest IMO are the Mavs

And look at who the youngest are. Wow, if the Thunder can make enough money to pay those guys they are gonna be doing this for a while. Can somebody say 80's Lakers?

Crackadalic
02-01-2011, 10:54 PM
Wow the Knicks and OKC are the one of the 4 younger teams and are both in playoff position. Both can only go up

Flash3
02-01-2011, 11:01 PM
Wow the Knicks and OKC are the one of the 4 younger teams and are both in playoff position. Both can only go up

There isn't any young "stars" on the knicks unless you consider amare "young" if the knicks didn't trade picks and penny pinch all these year i think they would be better judging by the how well they draft ie: fields, robinson, lee

avrpatsfan
02-01-2011, 11:10 PM
What would be a lot more interesting is the oldest teams in the league only counting the starting lineup. I'm sure the C's would be #1.

eXpLiiCt
02-01-2011, 11:14 PM
Okc, gotl?

Kakaroach
02-01-2011, 11:37 PM
Little surprised how high up the Jazz are, but signing Bell and Watson made a difference along with letting go Matthews.

mjqusoldier
02-01-2011, 11:41 PM
knicks and thunder top 5 youngest and they are both good teams. Future looks very bright for those 2 teams.

mjqusoldier
02-01-2011, 11:42 PM
There isn't any young "stars" on the knicks unless you consider amare "young" if the knicks didn't trade picks and penny pinch all these year i think they would be better judging by the how well they draft ie: fields, robinson, lee

heat fans love to hate lol you dont need stars to win a championship. I rather have 2 stars and some good players than 3stars and a bunch of bums.

Crackadalic
02-02-2011, 12:09 AM
There isn't any young "stars" on the knicks unless you consider amare "young" if the knicks didn't trade picks and penny pinch all these year i think they would be better judging by the how well they draft ie: fields, robinson, lee

So because the knicks doesnt have young stars their not considered young? Hell take Mason Jr off that team and the roster is even younger. And what does past years have to do with this years team? You make no sense. The fact Amare is the oldest at 28 proves how young they are