PDA

View Full Version : kobe player of the decade!!!!!



kobe24>lebron23
02-15-2010, 02:15 AM
he was voted as the player of the decade with 53 or 54% of the votes lebron came second with 17%:facepalm:

kobe24>lebron23
02-15-2010, 02:17 AM
^^ put the facepalm because shaq and duncan should have been ahead of lebron

Iggz53
02-15-2010, 02:27 AM
Now I am a big Shaq and Duncan fan and I don't think Kobe is the best player right now but Kobe deserved this. Barkley, Kenny, and C-Webb all picked Shaq but he dropped down from elite status in about 07. As dominant as he was from '92 to '06, the decade is from 2000 to 2010, and I don't think there's much doubt that Kobe owned the decade more than Shaq. Duncan was close though, it's close between those 2.

NYK_kidd77
02-15-2010, 02:36 AM
I think it was between shaq and kobe but i would probably have gone with shaq.

Hawkeye15
02-15-2010, 02:36 AM
from 2000-2010, its Kobe. Duncan's 1999 title that would push him ahead don't count. And LeBron wasn't even there for 3 years, he shouldn't be in the conversation imo.

Hawkeye15
02-15-2010, 02:37 AM
Shaq has a small claim, but his last few years have not been great, so he falls. He too gets penalized for having some of his prime pre-2000

ragee
02-15-2010, 02:41 AM
really? I think it is Duncan or Shaq... Maybe the last 5 years of the decade but from 2001-2010, Duncan or Shaq should get the credit... And another :facepalm:for the 17% that Lebron got... See what media does to you?

JLynn943
02-15-2010, 02:59 AM
It's a joke that Garnett is on the list over Iverson, but it doesn't matter because neither of them would be player of the decade anyway. That honor should go to Tim Duncan.

Sadds The Gr8
02-15-2010, 03:25 AM
This is a joke. IT was easily between Shaq and Duncan....Kobe wasn't even the Focal point of the 3peat team, it was Shaq. And Duncan was the focal point of his team winning 3 championships this decade. And the fact that Kobe won by a landslide deserves::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:

Sadds The Gr8
02-15-2010, 03:26 AM
It's a joke that Garnett is on the list over Iverson, but it doesn't matter because neither of them would be player of the decade anyway. That honor should go to Tim Duncan.

What? Garnett averaged 20+10 throughout this decade...are u kidding me? As much as I love Nash, he was the one that needed to be replaced by Iverson.

JLynn943
02-15-2010, 03:34 AM
What? Garnett averaged 20+10 throughout this decade...are u kidding me? As much as I love Nash, he was the one that needed to be replaced by Iverson.

Eh, you may be right. I think the argument could be made for all three of them though. It's too difficult narrowing it down to just 6.

kblo247
02-15-2010, 03:39 AM
Why were they chirping about Shaq on TNT? He wasn't even the best Laker player by his and Phil's own admission as of 02-03 and has steadily declined since.

I love Kobe but for consistency, I'd give it to Duncan with Kobe second. The only drawback is him getting beat by LA constantly, but lets face facts who didn't get steamrolled while Kobe and Shaq were averaging damn near 50 between them?

What really hurts Kobe and Shaq's case over Duncan is that they both underwent the exact same 5 year down period:
- They both went to the lottery
- They both got booted in 5 games in the first round
- They both lost to teams who they should have beat on paper (Finals/ECF)
- They both lost again in embarrassing fashion (losing a 3-1 lead and being swept)
- They both won a ring

Also, my biggest problem with that list is Nash making it over Kidd who led a lottery team to the finals twice and maybe Lebron making it over Iverson.

My List
Duncan
Kobe
Shaq
Kidd
KG (Boston puts him here)
AI - Lebron (their careers are eerily similar)

Sadds The Gr8
02-15-2010, 03:40 AM
Eh, you may be right. I think the argument could be made for all three of them though. It's too difficult narrowing it down to just 6.

Nash's 2 MVP's make it close, but I still think Garnett and Iverson are better players than Nash. Think about it like this, who will go to the hall of fame fastest outta the 3? I have it Garnett, then AI, then Nash.

JJ_JKidd
02-15-2010, 03:52 AM
Lebron 2nd ahead of Duncan and Shaq who have 8 Championships between them? Ridiculous!!!

NBA- "Where Marketing LeFake Happens." :facepalm:

Sadds The Gr8
02-15-2010, 03:55 AM
Lebron 2nd ahead of Duncan and Shaq who have 8 Championships between them? Ridiculous!!!

NBA- "Where Marketing LeFake Happens." :facepalm:

yea, like, what drug were these voters on? Even the fact that Kobe won by a landslide is pathetic...most of those voters are likely the Bandwagoner Laker fans...

I'm not calling all Laker fans bandwagoners, just the ones who started liking them in '08 after Kobe started winning again.

JJ_JKidd
02-15-2010, 04:06 AM
yea, like, what drug were these voters on? Even the fact that Kobe won by a landslide is pathetic...most of those voters are likely the Bandwagoner Laker fans...

I'm not calling all Laker fans bandwagoners, just the ones who started liking them in '08 after Kobe started winning again.

I personally like Kobe (and JKidd) and own various merchandise of his (along w/JKidd) but TBH id rather have Duncan because Mamba wasnt the MAIN MAN in the 3 of the 4 Laker 'Chips last decade.

I aint a homer, i just believe in the phrase "give credit where credit is due."

In any case, if LBJ won the award, it only means that the world should just cease to exist. Swallowed up by the Sun to be more specific!

ElMarroAfamado
02-15-2010, 04:14 AM
^^ put the facepalm because shaq and duncan should have been ahead of lebron

agree with Kobe finishing 1st and with the rest of what you said
:cool:

Jahari Kavi
02-15-2010, 04:16 AM
as barkley said "should've been shaq or duncan"..........kobe would be next on my list after those 2 men......Lebron shouldn't have finished in 2nd place....I would've liked to see A.I. and Wade on that list as well.......

Jahari Kavi
02-15-2010, 04:17 AM
He wasn't even the best Laker player by his and Phil's own admission as of 02-03

yeah....after the 3 peat

_KB24_
02-15-2010, 04:25 AM
Their is absolute no argument for Lebron to even sniff the Top 3. Complete BS.

Bullsfan22
02-15-2010, 04:32 AM
sad people don't understand what duncan has done this decade smh.

CowboysKB24
02-15-2010, 08:21 AM
Shaq has a small claim, but his last few years have not been great, so he falls. He too gets penalized for having some of his prime pre-2000

I feel the same way. Kobe been the best player, in most minds, since 2003 (Shaq and PJ even said it then). He played elite baskebetball all ten years of the decade. Shaq was elite until 2004. He was declining when he won it with Wade. The last five years Shaq has been declining rapidly. Add the playoff and regular season totals up and Kobe landslides him. Same goes for Duncan. It should have been between Tim and Kobe. Toss up IMO.

CowboysKB24
02-15-2010, 08:24 AM
Eh, you may be right. I think the argument could be made for all three of them though. It's too difficult narrowing it down to just 6.

The problem with all those guys is the lack of rings. There is one amongst all three of them.

JordansBulls
02-15-2010, 08:26 AM
Basketball fans are probably the least knowledgeable in all of sports. How could Lebron finish 2nd when he only played 6 years of 10?

JiffyMix88
02-15-2010, 08:46 AM
Why were they chirping about Shaq on TNT? He wasn't even the best Laker player by his and Phil's own admission as of 02-03 and has steadily declined since.

I love Kobe but for consistency, I'd give it to Duncan with Kobe second. The only drawback is him getting beat by LA constantly, but lets face facts who didn't get steamrolled while Kobe and Shaq were averaging damn near 50 between them?

What really hurts Kobe and Shaq's case over Duncan is that they both underwent the exact same 5 year down period:
- They both went to the lottery
- They both got booted in 5 games in the first round
- They both lost to teams who they should have beat on paper (Finals/ECF)
- They both lost again in embarrassing fashion (losing a 3-1 lead and being swept)
- They both won a ring

Also, my biggest problem with that list is Nash making it over Kidd who led a lottery team to the finals twice and maybe Lebron making it over Iverson.

My List
Duncan
Kobe
Shaq
Kidd
KG (Boston puts him here)
AI - Lebron (their careers are eerily similar)

i respect you( you should represent all laker fans)

wileyisTOFU
02-15-2010, 10:18 AM
Why were they chirping about Shaq on TNT? He wasn't even the best Laker player by his and Phil's own admission as of 02-03 and has steadily declined since.

I love Kobe but for consistency, I'd give it to Duncan with Kobe second. The only drawback is him getting beat by LA constantly, but lets face facts who didn't get steamrolled while Kobe and Shaq were averaging damn near 50 between them?

What really hurts Kobe and Shaq's case over Duncan is that they both underwent the exact same 5 year down period:
- They both went to the lottery
- They both got booted in 5 games in the first round
- They both lost to teams who they should have beat on paper (Finals/ECF)
- They both lost again in embarrassing fashion (losing a 3-1 lead and being swept)
- They both won a ring

Also, my biggest problem with that list is Nash making it over Kidd who led a lottery team to the finals twice and maybe Lebron making it over Iverson.

My List
Duncan
Kobe
Shaq
Kidd
KG (Boston puts him here)
AI - Lebron (their careers are eerily similar)

lost me there

KBfrom8to24
02-15-2010, 10:25 AM
LBJ should won the award by a landslide. Why not? The refs loves him. David Stern loves him. The media loves him.

kryptonate
02-15-2010, 12:24 PM
what a joke that was player of the decade is shaq then kobe then duncan

LionBryan
02-15-2010, 12:34 PM
Delonte West.

To ride around on a motorcyle with a shotgun in a guitar case ala Antonio Banderas?

How is that NOT player of the decade?

showtym24
02-15-2010, 12:56 PM
Now I am a big Shaq and Duncan fan and I don't think Kobe is the best player right now but Kobe deserved this. Barkley, Kenny, and C-Webb all picked Shaq but he dropped down from elite status in about 07. As dominant as he was from '92 to '06, the decade is from 2000 to 2010, and I don't think there's much doubt that Kobe owned the decade more than Shaq. Duncan was close though, it's close between those 2.

Exactly what i was thinking. Couldnt beleive the **** they were saying. Shaq was doo doo since 06. Kobe has been the best since 02, 6 finals appearances more than anyone, 4 rings,finals mvp, season mvp, allstar starter every year, all defensive team every year, all nba team every year, 81 point game, More points than anyone that decade. You cant argue with that.

And lebron shouldnt of even been on their. Duncan should of been second, with shaq third.

CowboysKB24
02-15-2010, 01:03 PM
Exactly what i was thinking. Couldnt beleive the **** they were saying. Shaq was doo doo since 06. Kobe has been the best since 02, 6 finals appearances more than anyone, 4 rings,finals mvp, season mvp, allstar starter every year, all defensive team every year, all nba team every year, 81 point game, More points than anyone that decade. You cant argue with that.

And lebron shouldnt of even been on their. Duncan should of been second, with shaq third.

That the right thing, I stated the same thing above.

ko8e24bryant
02-15-2010, 01:12 PM
And rightly So...

Kobe simply the best!

JordansBulls
02-15-2010, 01:48 PM
Shaq, Kobe and Duncan all have 4 titles.

Duncan and Shaq each have 3 finals mvp's as well.


So in order to figure this out, does someone have the stats for top 3 MVP finishes this decade? That would also help in this debate.

Kakaroach
02-15-2010, 01:58 PM
Yeah, its pretty much a toss-up between Shaq, Kobe, and Duncan. Kobe most likely won cuz of the 4 titles.

what54!?
02-15-2010, 02:00 PM
can't really argue against him but I will say this....guards get more love then big men...

JLynn943
02-15-2010, 02:07 PM
can't really argue against him but I will say this....guards get more love then big men...

this. If it wasn't left to the fans, I believe Duncan would have won. Unlike Shaq and Kobe, he's been great all decade. Not taking anything away from Kobe, as you can certainly make the argument for him, too, but I think this is just a case of fans being exposed to so much hype that it skews opinion.

Atticus Finch
02-15-2010, 02:11 PM
Shaq, Kobe and Duncan all have 4 titles.

Duncan and Shaq each have 3 finals mvp's as well.


So in order to figure this out, does someone have the stats for top 3 MVP finishes this decade? That would also help in this debate.

Duncan has 3 rings and 2 finals MVPs this decade. His first ring/finals mvp came in the 98/99 season. Tony Parker won the finals MVP in 06/07

smith&wesson
02-15-2010, 02:12 PM
no brainer... kobe hands down..

and very well deserved congrats kobe this is like winning the mvp for the last decade. sick :clap:

Driven
02-15-2010, 02:20 PM
This is a joke. IT was easily between Shaq and Duncan....Kobe wasn't even the Focal point of the 3peat team, it was Shaq. And Duncan was the focal point of his team winning 3 championships this decade. And the fact that Kobe won by a landslide deserves::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:
I don't get how anyone can make a case for Shaq over Kobe considering Shaq's injury history and how irrelevant Shaq has become in recent years.

Shaq played roughly 650 games in the 2000s. For comparison's sake, LeBron has played roughly 500 and Kobe has played roughly 750.

Romo2Bryant
02-15-2010, 02:20 PM
Shaq hands down... should have one. Everyone has like short memories and forgot how great he was in his prime.

But Congratulations Kobe.

And why was LeBron even on the list??? he played half of a decade.

JLynn943
02-15-2010, 02:21 PM
The problem with all those guys is the lack of rings. There is one amongst all three of them.

Yes, but there are 4 MVP awards among them and 27 All-Star game appearances, too. Garnett has the championship on the Celtics, 2004 MVP, and 2008 DPOY. Iverson has the 2001 MVP, 2001 Finals appearance, and 3 scoring ttitles ('01, '02, '05). And then Nash has the 2 MVPs and led the league in assists multiple times.

It's hard to justify leaving any of them out of the discussion, especially when they were doing this all decade unlike LeBron.

mfb_lt1birdman
02-15-2010, 02:31 PM
Shaq hands down... should have one. Everyone has like short memories and forgot how great he was in his prime.

But Congratulations Kobe.

And why was LeBron even on the list??? he played half of a decade.

Shaq was the man through about 04. After that he was big in 05-06. Beyond that he has been a role player and just plain bad in 08 and 09. His lack of staying in shape and constant health issues are a real sore spot for me too. Based on that dramatic fall off he CANNOT be player of the decade when you have two guys like Duncan and Kobe who have been so consistently good.

Even though Kobe was second fiddle to Shaq in the early part of the decade he still put up some monster numbers, especially during the playoffs. Post Shaq, I don't think his resume can be disputed as player of the decade.

Then there is Duncan, Mr. Consistent throughout the decade keeping his team in title contention, and always being among the best offensive and defensive players in the game.

I think I mentioned before it is pretty much a coin flip between Duncan and Kobe for me. Kobe was a way more flashy and did some truly amazing things. In Duncan you have the best PF ever.

Goes without saying Lebron should have never even been in the conversation.

ko8e24
02-15-2010, 02:46 PM
I cannot believe Stern's Golden Child was on the list :pity: and :facepalm:

Lakersfanla24
02-15-2010, 02:46 PM
it really just comes down to duncan and kobe with shaq being a close third. As many stated above shaq was in decline after the 05-06 season, where as kobe and duncan have been dominant all decade long. I wouldnt have a problem saying that they share the honor of that title. As far as lebron in second that just goes to show what media can do for a player.:rolleyes:

td0tsfinest
02-15-2010, 02:50 PM
The 2000 didn't really have a clearcut top player. The initial first five years, I would have gave it to Shaq and Duncan as the runner up, for that latter 5 years I say Kobe and Lebron right behind him.

Chacarron
02-15-2010, 03:15 PM
Congrats Kobe.

Bruno
02-15-2010, 03:48 PM
Shaq-Duncan-Bryant
Duncan-Bryant-Shaq
Bryant-Shaq-Duncan

This has been debated so much on this forum. Everyone knows its between these three guys with KG, AI, Nash, LeBron, Dirk, and Wade heading the second tier.

At this point, the argument seems irrelevant. When all three of these guys are retired we won't be asking, "who was the best player of the 2000's". We'll be asking, who out of the three had the greatest career.

$KnicksAndKobe$
02-15-2010, 04:01 PM
I have no problem with Kobe as the player of the decade but if Shaq or Duncan won then I would have no problem either. But the fact that Lebron was second place in the votes and Kobe won EASILY meens either this was rigged or most of the fans are dumb.

Pornstar86
02-15-2010, 04:06 PM
should have been shaq....from 2000-2010 he has accumulated the following:

4 championships
3 finals mvp
1 nba mvp
9 all star appearances
1 scoring title
3 nba all star mvp
7 all nba first team
3 all def second team

plus much more

Lakers4ItAll
02-15-2010, 04:41 PM
Shaq/Duncan should have won and Kobe was deff 3rd. Lebron doesnt even belong on the list, but then again we all know the media has to hype him up more and more

mp3
02-15-2010, 05:01 PM
why does shaq get all the credit for the 3 titles in the early 2000's. People act like Kobe did nothing for them. Without Kobe their not winning 3 titles and without shaq their not winning 3 titles. Wade was the main guy when they shaq won his 4th and kobe was obviously the main guy winning it last year. Its not Kobe fault he thrived throughout a whole decade and shaq started in the 90's. Shaq declined so fast.

Kobe
Shaq
Duncan

Raph12
02-15-2010, 05:26 PM
I'd take Shaq for most dominant, but I'd take Duncan for best player... Lebron shouldn't have even been on this poll and AI shouldn't have been left out.

DCB/LAL
02-15-2010, 06:04 PM
Kobe earned it no doubt. IDK how Lebron gets second thats a slap in the face to Shaq and Duncan.

Wade should be on this list before Lebron.

Atticus Finch
02-15-2010, 06:56 PM
should have been shaq....from 2000-2010 he has accumulated the following:

4 championships
3 finals mvp
1 nba mvp
9 all star appearances
1 scoring title
3 nba all star mvp
7 all nba first team
3 all def second team

plus much more

From 2000-2010 Kobe accumulated:

4 championships
6 finals apperances
1 finals mvp
1 nba mvp
10 all star appearances
2 scoring titles
3 all star game mvps
7 time all nba first team (2 second team, 1 third team)
7 time defensive first team (2 second team)
1 gold medal

One 81 point game
Five 60+ point games
Twenty-four 50+ point games
Four straight 50 point games
NBA record for most three pointers in a game (12)

For comparison

KBfrom8to24
02-15-2010, 07:21 PM
Basketball fans are probably the least knowledgeable in all of sports. How could Lebron finish 2nd when he only played 6 years of 10?
And without even a ring... what do we expect he was so pampered by the media. Hail the King of Nothing!!!!

KBfrom8to24
02-15-2010, 07:34 PM
should have been shaq....from 2000-2010 he has accumulated the following:

4 championships
3 finals mvp
1 nba mvp
9 all star appearances
1 scoring title
3 nba all star mvp
7 all nba first team
3 all def second team

plus much more

Shaq's accomplishments is nowhere near againts Kobe's accomplishments this decade. The year 2004 is the year Shaq's dominance was ended, as exposed by Ben Wallace and his Detroit Pistons. While Kobe has done amazing and unmatched performances throughout the end of this decade.

_KB24_
02-15-2010, 07:48 PM
It's between Kobe and Duncan. Duncan for consistency, but Kobe was the most exciting player this decade and he ended up with more rings than Duncan.

Dominant= Shaq
Exciting= Kobe
Consistency= Duncan

Player of the Decade= You choose

Lebron is lucky to sniff the Top 5.

JJ_JKidd
02-15-2010, 09:31 PM
Why were they chirping about Shaq on TNT? He wasn't even the best Laker player by his and Phil's own admission as of 02-03 and has steadily declined since.

I love Kobe but for consistency, I'd give it to Duncan with Kobe second. The only drawback is him getting beat by LA constantly, but lets face facts who didn't get steamrolled while Kobe and Shaq were averaging damn near 50 between them?

What really hurts Kobe and Shaq's case over Duncan is that they both underwent the exact same 5 year down period:
- They both went to the lottery
- They both got booted in 5 games in the first round
- They both lost to teams who they should have beat on paper (Finals/ECF)
- They both lost again in embarrassing fashion (losing a 3-1 lead and being swept)
- They both won a ring

Also, my biggest problem with that list is Nash making it over Kidd who led a lottery team to the finals twice and maybe Lebron making it over Iverson.

My List
Duncan
Kobe
Shaq
Kidd
KG (Boston puts him here)
AI - Lebron (their careers are eerily similar)

Wooot I didnt see that. Nash ahead of Kidd? Hell yeah that's so true LOL! Like what did Nash do with his Joe Johnson, Amare and Marion line-up. Kidd led a bunch of MF'in NOBODYS to the Finals!!! NOBODYS!!!!


I cannot believe Stern's Golden Child was on the list :pity: and :facepalm:

Stern's boyfriend :facepalm:

ThuglifeJ
02-15-2010, 09:36 PM
I would have given it to Shaq. Think of the whole decade, Shaq in prime is one of the best players to ever play.

then again his time started before this decade, same with Duncan. Its not like they were dominant last year. WHile Kobe was. Then again Kobe wasnt any more special then AI, VInce, Tmac back in like 2000, he was second fiddle to Shaq.

but Im fine with Kobe winning it.

and yet lebron who hasnt even been in this whole decade and hasnt won anything is second? Winning a championship let alone 3-4 is a lot lot harder then u think.

ThuglifeJ
02-15-2010, 09:38 PM
_KB24_ is that Lebron after they announced DWade as the MVP of all star game? hahah

thegreatone89
02-15-2010, 09:45 PM
I love Tim, think hes great an all...but kobe has a 18-10 post season record against him this decade averaging 29.6pts, 4.9ast, 5.8reb. Please there is no discussion. and dont bring up the he had shaq crap its tired and lame thought people stopped using it after kobe took his lakers to back to back finals.

But who in the world put lebron in and not dwade, wassup wit dat?:confused:

koreancabbage
02-15-2010, 09:53 PM
hey guys, instead of getting upset at Kobe winning it, you guys should get mad at Lebron being in the top 5 for the decade. Kobe is a deserving top 5 player of the decade while Lebron isn't. I'm sure Shaq and Duncan were considered, but come on, everyone here should be mad that Lebron is all the way up there. Get off Lebron's balls and start looking at the real problem here: Lebron in the top 5, gimme a break

Public Enemy #1
02-15-2010, 10:00 PM
What a joke, Lebron shouldn't have even been in the conversation. Duncan, Shaq, then Kobe.

CowboysKB24
02-15-2010, 10:27 PM
should have been shaq....from 2000-2010 he has accumulated the following:

4 championships
3 finals mvp
1 nba mvp
9 all star appearances
1 scoring title
3 nba all star mvp
7 all nba first team
3 all def second team

plus much more

Most of those awards you just named he received from 2000-2003. This award is for the entire decade. Look at Shaqs stats from 05-10 (playoffs and regular season). They are in no comparison to Duncan or Kobe. That is Shaq's only downfall. You can't give the award to a guy that was only GREAT for four years of the decade. Kobe and Duncan have been great the entire decade.

CowboysKB24
02-15-2010, 10:29 PM
I love Tim, think hes great an all...but kobe has a 18-10 post season record against him this decade averaging 29.6pts, 4.9ast, 5.8reb. Please there is no discussion. and dont bring up the he had shaq crap its tired and lame thought people stopped using it after kobe took his lakers to back to back finals.

But who in the world put lebron in and not dwade, wassup wit dat?:confused:

People need forget that Shaq would not have won those finals without Kobe either. Granted Shaq was the better player and in his prime, but he wasn't WAY better than Kobe. Kobe was right there behind him and just as important to Shaq.

ThuglifeJ
02-15-2010, 10:32 PM
how can you guys compare a wing to a center.

DodgerBulls
02-15-2010, 10:41 PM
Shaq has a small claim, but his last few years have not been great, so he falls. He too gets penalized for having some of his prime pre-2000

But he was the man on the early 00s championship days. If that was the case, no one should be nominated. I'd say Shaq or Duncan for the award.

Ssshbliblibl00p
02-15-2010, 10:41 PM
he was voted as the player of the decade with 53 or 54% of the votes lebron came second with 17%:facepalm:

Wow this is riveting stuff here. Way to go Lakers!!! and Their awesome awesome fans! Congrats Kobe!

DodgerBulls
02-15-2010, 10:44 PM
People need forget that Shaq would not have won those finals without Kobe either. Granted Shaq was the better player and in his prime, but he wasn't WAY better than Kobe. Kobe was right there behind him and just as important to Shaq.

WHAT? And if Shaq would have not won the championship w/o Kobe and vice versa.. then the award should have been split between them two right? I'd say the last 5 years was Kobe>Shaq.. but late 1999-2004, 2006 is Shaq.

Denver-boy
02-15-2010, 11:07 PM
and now u know why everyone hates Kobe, he's the player of the decade , but dont publish it, rubb ur jock strap all over everyones faces. He's good we get it... but still so lakers fans see This

Kobe>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Micheal Jordan