PDA

View Full Version : Witch one is worst NY 50 point lost , or the CHI 36 point lead loss?



bears88
01-25-2010, 01:57 AM
what is more embarrassing having a lead by 35 points and that team loosing coming back from that deficit and ends up winning the game or losing by 50 points at home ( no disrepect to knicks fan) which one of these are bad or embarrassing and why? any thoughts??

pd7631
01-25-2010, 02:15 AM
I'd be pissed as hell if my team blew a 35 point lead. But if my team lost by 50, I think I could just laugh it off and get ready for the next game.

Raph12
01-25-2010, 02:17 AM
Both are damn embarassing, I'd want a someone to be traded/fired.

Shady66
01-25-2010, 02:23 AM
Id rather lose by 50 lol
atleest then u can turn it off after the first Q. When up by 35 and lose, u gotta suffer lol

salimstoudamire
01-25-2010, 02:38 AM
what is more embarrassing getting up by 35 points and coming back from that deficit and winning the game or losing by 50 points at home ( no disrepect to knicks fan) which one of these are bad or embarrassing and why? any thoughts??

:facepalm: I understand what you meant to say, but it just came out wrong. If you are up by 35, you wouldn't have to come back from any deficit.

But if I had to answer the question, give me the losing by 50 points. It just says my team is trash and/or needed a wakeup call.

iggypop123
01-25-2010, 02:40 AM
losing a 35 point lead and then the team wins by 4 so thats a 39 point switch. its not worse than a 50 point loss by the numbers however its more pathetic. its easy to tank once down, but to do it while on top of the world. bad

bears88
01-25-2010, 03:15 AM
:facepalm: I understand what you meant to say, but it just came out wrong. If you are up by 35, you wouldn't have to come back from any deficit.

But if I had to answer the question, give me the losing by 50 points. It just says my team is trash and/or needed a wakeup call.


well yea i gave my self a face palm on my explaination but i corrected in and i hopeit makes more sense now i have a couple of drinks lol

JNA17
01-25-2010, 04:14 AM
both but mostly winning by 30+ but then lose in the end.

TheWatcher34
01-25-2010, 08:03 AM
the Bulls "managed" to blow a lead of 35 points this season didn't they?

i'd rather loose by 50. Go Knicks!!

JnasD
01-25-2010, 08:34 AM
Both are horrible but i would rather lose by 50. Having a 35 point lead and still losing means no lead is safe and losing by 50 means you just give up.

asandhu23
01-25-2010, 08:35 AM
the Bulls "managed" to blow a lead of 35 points this season didn't they?

i'd rather loose by 50. Go Knicks!!

bait much?

scandaless2
01-25-2010, 12:24 PM
This is for the season worst defeat.

king4day
01-25-2010, 12:35 PM
50 point losses are terrible but they do happen more than blowing a lead over 30.
So i picked the blown lead. That's gut wrenching since it's something you don't see coming.

thephoenixson28
01-25-2010, 12:36 PM
The same cuz all it says on both of there records is another L on there record.

mikantsass
01-25-2010, 12:37 PM
Blown lead.... A 36 point blown lead ssimply means a team stops playing. Espicially to a below average team like the Kings.

A 50 point blowout means one team is clearly better than the other.

madiaz3
01-25-2010, 12:39 PM
Blown lead.... A 36 point blown lead ssimply means a team stops playing. Espicially to a below average team like the Kings.

A 50 point blowout means one team is clearly better than the other.

Agreed about the first part at least. The Nets SHOULD beat the Lakers 10/10 times if the game started 36-0 in favor of the Nets.

When one team shoots lights out and another builds several blocks of real estate with their bricks, a 50 point loss can happen.

giventofly
01-25-2010, 12:43 PM
Bulls loss was worse.

scandaless2
01-25-2010, 12:52 PM
I would say like some ppl say . its a tale of 2 half's ... teams build leads all the time and blow them . that's why its called a comeback.. most teams get relaxed after a big lead, along with putting in they bench . all u need is a little confidence and u can get some runs and some stops. But to never be into a game from the start , ithats not good. 50 point loss is worst..

save the knicks
01-25-2010, 12:53 PM
Losing a 36 pt lead to a team of equal to lesser talent is far worse than being dismantled by a contender

igPay atinLay
01-25-2010, 01:28 PM
Blown lead.... A 36 point blown lead ssimply means a team stops playing. Espicially to a below average team like the Kings.

A 50 point blowout means one team is clearly better than the other.


I agree with this completely. I do want to add one thing. I think to beat a NBA team by 50 you are not only clearly the better team, but your having a great day and they are having a horrible day.

scandaless2
01-25-2010, 01:33 PM
what is more embarrassing having a lead by 35 points and that team loosing coming back from that deficit and ends up winning the game or losing by 50 points at home ( no disrepect to knicks fan) which one of these are bad or embarrassing and why? any thoughts??

we both was thinking alike on this thread... i did not kno u made one up befor i made mine... sorry bro.

LanceUpperCut
01-25-2010, 01:35 PM
Losing a 36 point lead with 6 or 7 mins left to the Kings is alot worse than a 50 point blowout to Dallas but ya both pretty bad and I believe both were at home.

DaBUU
01-25-2010, 01:46 PM
the Bulls "managed" to blow a lead of 35 points this season didn't they?

i'd rather loose by 50. Go Knicks!!

:facepalm:

DaBUU
01-25-2010, 01:49 PM
the 50 point loss was worse. we have a halfway decent team that had a really bad second half, the Knicks just arent a good team imo and a 50 point loss is indicative of the type of team they are.

GodsSon
01-25-2010, 01:50 PM
It's "which" :)

madiaz3
01-25-2010, 02:16 PM
the 50 point loss was worse. we have a halfway decent team that had a really bad second half, the Knicks just arent a good team imo and a 50 point loss is indicative of the type of team they are.

the bulls are on no higher level than the knicks, they're basically the same team now except you've had the luxury of more and higher picks than us the past few years.

bigsams50
01-25-2010, 02:21 PM
Losing a 30 plus point lead is worse

beardown78
01-25-2010, 02:37 PM
the bulls are on no higher level than the knicks, they're basically the same team now except you've had the luxury of more and higher picks than us the past few years.

With that being said the bulls are still A awful team that managed to make the playoffs 4 out of the last five years with A series sweep against the defending champs(Miami) while the knicks havent sniffed the playoffs since 2001. So please explain how we arent on a higher level. You guys had high lottery picks who didnt pan out and spent A ton of money on awful contracts via freeagents or picking up another teams trash. You guys had every oppurtunity over the years to better you're team just like the Bulls.

beardown78
01-25-2010, 02:40 PM
Blowing A 35point lead to A bad team without there leading scorer is far worst IMO. Losing by 50 can happen when A team is on fire and nothing goes right for the opposing team. I think it was just A bad matchup for the Knicks that game nothing against them

blams
01-25-2010, 02:58 PM
It was 35 points. But easily the Knicks 50 point loss.

29$JerZ
01-25-2010, 03:45 PM
Getting beat down by the better overall team happens, losing a game when your up by over 30 and have a supposed star PG against a rookie PG leading his team is worse.

DaBUU
01-25-2010, 04:04 PM
Getting beat down by the better overall team happens, losing a game when your up by over 30 and have a supposed star PG against a rookie PG leading his team is worse.

yeah but getting beat by 50 points doesnt happen every day, just pathetic from start to finish. that Knicks team might be worst team in BB

IversonIsKrazy
01-25-2010, 05:56 PM
"WHICH" i would think is worse would be the blowing a 35 pt lead @ home. that is ridiculous .

MiamiHeat
01-25-2010, 05:58 PM
CHI 36 point lead blow

:pity:

Yanks All Day
01-25-2010, 06:08 PM
If a team never leads a game and ends up losing by 50, there is a good chance they stopped really trying some point during that game. To lose the way the Bulls did is just bad. I'd rather lose by 50 than blow a 36 point lead, most of which was in the 4th quarter, if I'm not mistaken.

Afridi786
01-25-2010, 06:11 PM
the Bulls "managed" to blow a lead of 35 points this season didn't they?

i'd rather loose by 50. Go Knicks!!

Yeah go Knicks....:p

Ovratd1up
01-25-2010, 06:14 PM
The Bulls were up like 33 with 15 minutes left in the game. That's just ****ed up.

Slimsim
01-25-2010, 06:47 PM
Dallas Is No Joke they are the Second best team In the WEST And they played Excellent Basketball. It happens Look at the Hornets Blowout lose Against Denver In the playoffs.

Not bashing Sacramento But for the Bulls to lose a 35 point lead to a team that Didn't have Kevin Martin and Garcia the 2 top Scorer on the team is just plain Ugly

heyman321
01-25-2010, 07:02 PM
The blown lead is much worse. Bulls got beat by the Kings.

Knicks got killed by the Mavericks, who are a much better a team anyways.

runforrestrunx9
01-25-2010, 07:17 PM
chicago game was worse, the knicks was pathetic, but the bulls game was unbelievable

dont mean to bait any1, my sixers suck pretty bad 2

vash9
01-25-2010, 07:20 PM
A blown 36 point lead is far more worst. At least the Knicks knew they were going to lose, but to lead by 36 and at the end of the game lose, that's pretty horrible.

jimbobjarree
01-25-2010, 07:20 PM
the worst one is your spelling of which

29$JerZ
01-25-2010, 07:38 PM
yeah but getting beat by 50 points doesnt happen every day, just pathetic from start to finish. that Knicks team might be worst team in BB

Well having a 30+ lead with only 1 quarter left to go and still lose the game doesn't happen often either.

Dallas is a better team then NY, that's a given. The fact it was at NY home doesn;t matter since the talent descripency is vast.

Chicago losing to a team led by a rookie, missing its two best scorers is far worser.

NY is not the worst team in BB, I don't know what your basing that on.

fresh prince
01-25-2010, 07:44 PM
Definitely the Bulls blowing the 35 point lead at home..

Especially since I would have won $600 if they held on for the win!

Jerks!~

kjoke
01-25-2010, 08:10 PM
its which.... blowing the lead is worse

Philly Hammer
01-25-2010, 09:40 PM
50 point blowout you see teams blow leads all the time but, a 50 point beatdown rarely ever happens. The knicks were just pathetic no matter how good the mavericks were.

Sly Guy
01-25-2010, 10:03 PM
blowing the lead, because it was to a far worse opponent.

CELTICS4LYFE
01-26-2010, 11:54 AM
50 point blowout you see teams blow leads all the time but, a 50 point beatdown rarely ever happens. The knicks were just pathetic no matter how good the mavericks were.

not 36 point leads tho

KnicksorBust
01-26-2010, 11:58 AM
Easier to shaky off a blowout because you mentally checked out before the final whistle. 36 point collapse stays with you

heathonater
01-26-2010, 11:59 AM
losing by 50 is better than losing a 35 pt lead. can just accept that your team had a horrible game if you lose by 50. however, losing a 30+ pt lead shows that your team gave up on playing hard in the game, indicative of a coaching or player problem.

ldc62
01-27-2010, 12:29 PM
Its the Knicks... so people aren't that surprised. But anytime you are up more than 20 and lose in the 4th quarter, thats terrible.

ballpd05
01-27-2010, 05:04 PM
Blown lead.... A 36 point blown lead ssimply means a team stops playing. Espicially to a below average team like the Kings.

A 50 point blowout means one team is clearly better than the other.

Not necessarily. I have been on AAU teams that have lost by 50+ and then met that same team a few weeks later and beat them by 12. When a team jumps on you and it seems like nothing can go right confidence falls, frustration sets in, and morale falls while the other teams soars. That will cause the lead to grow and grow.

To blow a 35 point lead especially when you are already struggling with getting normal wins is a pretty tough one to take and will leave you with hometown boos and make you the butt of alot of jokes... Especially losing to a less than steller team that way.

DLeeicious
01-27-2010, 05:35 PM
Definitely the Chicago loss, I had money on the game.

Draco
01-27-2010, 05:42 PM
the bulls are on no higher level than the knicks, they're basically the same team now except you've had the luxury of more and higher picks than us the past few years.

lol.. this is what knicks fans have thought every year for the past 5 years and yet the knicks are the consistently below .500 team that doesn't make the playoffs.

Draco
01-27-2010, 05:44 PM
my answer to the thread question.. the Bulls loss was worse.. I'm kinda desensitized to the Knicks having lousy performances.

JDizzle
01-27-2010, 05:48 PM
getting blown out happens all the time. but being blowing out by 36 and coming back from that. that is embarassing to the bulls thats just a shame