View Full Version : Where Do These Rosters Finish in the East and West?

01-16-2010, 10:14 AM
Let's assume we're back in October so none of this gun play happened.

Team A
PG Gilbert Arenas
SG Jason Richardson
SF Antawn Jamison
PF Troy Murphy
C Erik Dampier

6th Mike Dunleavy

Team B
PG Steve Nash
SG Marquis Daniels
SF Antawn Jamison
PF Dirk Nowitzki
C Erik Dampier

6th Jason Terry

01-16-2010, 02:43 PM
After everyone posts can you explain the point of the comparison?

01-16-2010, 09:08 PM
After everyone posts can you explain the point of the comparison?

I didnt mean it to be a comparison between team A and B, in fact my original post didn't even include team B.

But there is a logic behind the two rosters.

01-16-2010, 09:11 PM
B is better IMO

01-16-2010, 09:13 PM
B is better IMO

Don't compare the two. I am asking how each one would fare in the two conferences. More specifically, team A plays out the season, where do they finished. Then pretend team A never existed and substitute team B, where do they finish?

01-16-2010, 09:24 PM
East-6-9th Seed

West- 8- 10th Seed

East- 4-6th seed

West- 6-10th Seed

01-16-2010, 09:26 PM
needs more Mike James on each roster.

01-16-2010, 10:15 PM
Both teams get burned out from having to play so many minutes with only 6 men on the roster. Leads to an early playoff exit for both teams.

01-16-2010, 10:25 PM
Team A :

Eastern Conference :
7th seeded

Western Conference :
10th seeded


Team B :

Eastern Conference :
4th seeded

Western Conference :
5th-6th seeded

01-17-2010, 12:02 AM
Isn't team A just the old Warriors and team B the old Mavericks?? some of those players though were maybe a year off of each other....

01-17-2010, 12:18 AM
team A imo is just a terrible team.

West - 12th - 15th
East - 9th - 12th

team B is a very good team.

West - 3rd - 7th
East - 1st - 5th

01-17-2010, 12:49 AM
It would be too hard to tell their seedings, but I'm taking Team A with a vintage Arenas.