PDA

View Full Version : Better Series - Lakers/Blazers 2000 or Lakers/Kings 2002



JordansBulls
11-26-2009, 04:51 PM
Which was the better series?

-Kobe24-TJ19-
11-26-2009, 05:08 PM
beating the Queens

ko8e24
11-26-2009, 05:15 PM
hard to choose one or the other. one led to the 1st title of the dynasty, and the other led to a 3-peat. But to me, the more nerve wrecking one was game 7 at home against portland, down by 15 to start the 4th.

adidas2307
11-26-2009, 05:23 PM
I would have to pick Lakers/Blazers, because the Lakers/Kings series was the most corrupt series in NBA playoff history. The Lakers did not deserve to 3-peat.

MTar786
11-26-2009, 05:53 PM
thats a really tough one.. i gotta go with lakers kings.. what a series. horry game winner ( i was there for) and game 7 ot where the kings choked. oh n to the post above mine.. was it corrupt when the kings were missing their free throws in game 7. if they were making them the lakers would not have threepeated

anpmp
11-26-2009, 07:22 PM
In the Lakers/Kings series, eventhough Game 6 was gifted to the Lakers by the referees, Game 5 was gifted to the Kings by the referees. No one ever talks about Game 5 just because the Lakers won the series in the end. However, Kings could have easily won the series if they hadn't missed so many wide-open threes and free-throws in Game 7.