View Full Version : Better Series - Lakers/Blazers 2000 or Lakers/Kings 2002

11-26-2009, 04:51 PM
Which was the better series?

11-26-2009, 05:08 PM
beating the Queens

11-26-2009, 05:15 PM
hard to choose one or the other. one led to the 1st title of the dynasty, and the other led to a 3-peat. But to me, the more nerve wrecking one was game 7 at home against portland, down by 15 to start the 4th.

11-26-2009, 05:23 PM
I would have to pick Lakers/Blazers, because the Lakers/Kings series was the most corrupt series in NBA playoff history. The Lakers did not deserve to 3-peat.

11-26-2009, 05:53 PM
thats a really tough one.. i gotta go with lakers kings.. what a series. horry game winner ( i was there for) and game 7 ot where the kings choked. oh n to the post above mine.. was it corrupt when the kings were missing their free throws in game 7. if they were making them the lakers would not have threepeated

11-26-2009, 07:22 PM
In the Lakers/Kings series, eventhough Game 6 was gifted to the Lakers by the referees, Game 5 was gifted to the Kings by the referees. No one ever talks about Game 5 just because the Lakers won the series in the end. However, Kings could have easily won the series if they hadn't missed so many wide-open threes and free-throws in Game 7.