View Full Version : Cavs would have been better with Shaq or better off without him?
EddieB
02-19-2009, 10:26 PM
What was the big trade rumor, Shaq for Ben Wallace and sasha pavlovic? Could Shaq fit with the Cavs system with Big Z there already. Would Shaq slow the Cavs break down and take up too much space for Lebron to do his stuff in the paint?
Joshtd1
02-19-2009, 10:29 PM
Well....I dont know, Shaq would clog alot of the paint up for LBJ to drive....and him wanting touches would take away from LBJ as well. Who knows though
ULT WARRIOR408
02-19-2009, 10:29 PM
I think it would have been a great move for the cavs to get shaq but only if the involve big z ithe trade
Rique
02-19-2009, 10:37 PM
i think shaq would have won another ring
ARMIN12NBA
02-19-2009, 10:49 PM
Well....I dont know, Shaq would clog alot of the paint up for LBJ to drive....and him wanting touches would take away from LBJ as well. Who knows though
For these reasons, they are better off without Shaq. Lebron wouldn't be able to play with Shaq. Shaq clogs up the lane too much, which won't allow LBJ to drive. They need mid-range shooting big men like Big Z or AV.
GREATNESS ONE
02-19-2009, 10:50 PM
^ me too I am so glad this trade did not go thru. Wouldve been bad for my Lakers.
Lakers4ItAll
02-19-2009, 10:52 PM
I think Shaq would have been the missing piece that could have put them right up there w/ LAL n BOS
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2019 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.