PDA

View Full Version : Miami Heat NBA Live 09 Heat ratings...



daleja424
08-06-2008, 08:09 PM
NBA LIVE 09 Ratings:

The Rookie Part 8 leaks the heat's ratings for next year... check out this screen shot I took...

http://i37.tinypic.com/2znpjq0.jpg

thoughts?

oh and check out Part 8...its pretty funny: http://sports.espn.go.com/broadband/video/videopage?videoId=3520775&n8pe6c=2

marlinsfan24
08-06-2008, 08:12 PM
Mario=65? wtf, hes a 100 in my mind ;)

MiamiHeat
08-06-2008, 08:13 PM
Looks good Wade went down 2 i think he used to be 94, Haslem should be 79 at least

daleja424
08-06-2008, 08:13 PM
I feel like Wade/Haslem/Beasley should all be a little higher...

MiamiHeat
08-06-2008, 08:15 PM
I feel like Wade/Haslem/Beasley should all be a little higher...

rookies are always around that rating 75-79, well top picks mostly

marlinsfan24
08-06-2008, 08:15 PM
They seriously should. Wade should be around 94-95, Haslem 78-81, Beasley at least 82. and Marion should be a 90.
Chalmers is unproven, so thats correct

fins08
08-06-2008, 08:19 PM
65 for Mario. At least a 68-70. Wade shuld be higher as should UD.

daleja424
08-06-2008, 08:20 PM
I woulda said...

Chalmers- 70
Wade- 95
Marion-88
Beasley- 81
Haslem- 78

daleja424
08-06-2008, 08:21 PM
heres a good question... over under 68 for mark Blount?

marlinsfan24
08-06-2008, 08:21 PM
This thread is taking away posters from todays Marlins game....lool

marlinsfan24
08-06-2008, 08:21 PM
heres a good question... over under 68 for mark Blount?

well below lol

daleja424
08-06-2008, 08:23 PM
This thread is taking away posters from todays Marlins game....lool

no the way the marlins are playing is doing that... :(

fins08
08-06-2008, 08:32 PM
blount is a 42 at best,

daleja424
08-06-2008, 08:33 PM
blount is a 42 at best,

I was being serious :mad:!!! B/c I would put him at 68 I think... so thats two people who say UNDER...

MiamiHeat
08-06-2008, 08:33 PM
blount is a 42 at best,

they will give him a 65-70 rating
but he deserves a 40-50 rating

daleja424
08-06-2008, 08:38 PM
I dont know if you guys have looked at the website but NBA Live 09 looks SICKKK! look at these news features:

http://www.easports.com/nbalive09/dna.jsp

http://www.easports.com/nbalive09/media.jsp?mediaType=video

http://www.easports.com/nbalive09/features.jsp

rico
08-06-2008, 08:46 PM
topic says 08 hehe instead of 09. good post. giving u a shout out in my thread in the bulls for that one find with the ratings :)

MiamiHeat
08-06-2008, 08:46 PM
NBA LIVE 365 thats sick and an awesome feature would be very helpful

daleja424
08-06-2008, 08:49 PM
topic says 08 hehe instead of 09. good post. giving u a shout out in my thread in the bulls for that one find with the ratings :)

haha...whoops! :D

BALLER71
08-06-2008, 08:52 PM
Blount puts up good numbers but if you watch him, he sucks.
72 for Blount.

BALLER71
08-06-2008, 08:59 PM
That DNA thing seems really cool.
thanks for the vids Daleja :clap:

daleja424
08-06-2008, 09:08 PM
That DNA thing seems really cool.
thanks for the vids Daleja :clap:

:up::up::up:

King Koopa
08-06-2008, 09:09 PM
Wow Beasley is so Funny in that Video....

daleja424
08-06-2008, 09:10 PM
Wow Beasley is so Funny in that Video.... bro and Beasley didnt look small standing next to Jordan and jordans like 7 feet right.

6'11'' I think. but ya... beasley doesnt look that small does he...

rico
08-06-2008, 09:16 PM
the DNA thing couldve been stolen from 2k9 unfortunately since 2k is so mum on their features it couldve been taken. but live does has the license for live updates, 2k will have to put updates on a server etc.. but i REALLY hope they do more updates. takes forever for the to update after a trade/signing etc..

King Koopa
08-06-2008, 09:19 PM
6'11'' I think. but ya... beasley doesnt look that small does he...

Naw that wasnt Jordan it was...Donte Greene, and hes 6"10

daleja424
08-06-2008, 09:24 PM
Naw that wasnt Jordan it was...Donte Greene, and hes 6"10

naw....it was deandre jordan at the live part in the beg

daleja424
08-06-2008, 09:25 PM
the DNA thing couldve been stolen from 2k9 unfortunately since 2k is so mum on their features it couldve been taken. but live does has the license for live updates, 2k will have to put updates on a server etc.. but i REALLY hope they do more updates. takes forever for the to update after a trade/signing etc..

live started the DNA thing last year actually... its EA's original idea. This year they have just taken it like 10 steps further

sergiogon
08-06-2008, 09:32 PM
some body know the nba 2k9 ratings?

daleja424
08-06-2008, 09:34 PM
some body know the nba 2k9 ratings?

not yet...we arent even suppose to know the live ratings...

DQL
08-06-2008, 10:39 PM
damn those ratings suck. If I buy LIVE 09 I'll have to edit them. LIVE series suck. Maybe this year I'll go w/ 2K9

TheHeat3
08-06-2008, 10:53 PM
NBA Live 365 is a great idea...still wont buy it tho. NBA 2k fan since 2k5 and still going strong :D glad to see though that Live is actually focused on fixing up the Gameplay because before all they really ever did was change up the graphics and add 1 new Main thing whether it be the dunking contest or 3 point contest, but it still felt stiff and every character felt the same...so props to Gilbert last year...*Who has confessed to playing NBA 2k7 all the time before he became the face of Live 08..because they paid more*..to helping NBA Live change the frame rate and work on the little things..but they still have a long way to go

daleja424
08-06-2008, 11:24 PM
http://www.prosportsdaily.com/forums/showthread.php?t=256664

go there...the Bulls think they have 10 players better then Haslem on their roster....:laugh:

DQL
08-06-2008, 11:32 PM
http://www.prosportsdaily.com/forums/showthread.php?t=256664

go there...the Bulls think they have 10 players better then Haslem on their roster....:laugh:

Rose -78
Hinrich - 86
Thabo - 75
Gordon - 83
Hughes - 82
Deng - 87
Nocioni - 84
Gooden- 76
Thomas -77
Simmons - 68
Noah -77
Gray -69

WTF? He gotta be smoking

And Daleja you gave Deng a 88?????

daleja424
08-06-2008, 11:35 PM
Rose -78
Hinrich - 86
Thabo - 75
Gordon - 83
Hughes - 82
Deng - 87
Nocioni - 84
Gooden- 76
Thomas -77
Simmons - 68
Noah -77
Gray -69

WTF? He gotta be smoking

And Daleja you gave Deng a 88?????

I was more concerned with Thabo, Thomas, and Noah all getting higher rankings then Haslem...thats ridiculous!

I originally had an 85 for him...but 88 is about right if Marion got 88...

DQL
08-06-2008, 11:40 PM
Marion has to have way higher rating then Deng b/c he's one of the most versatile and efficient players in the league. Rebound, block, score, steal, athleticism, ....

daleja424
08-06-2008, 11:41 PM
Marion has to have way higher rating then Deng b/c he's one of the most versatile and efficient players in the league. Rebound, block, score, steal, athleticism, ....

ya but video games dont care about that stuff...Its about the #'s for them... maybe 85-86 for deng... but still he's not that much worse...

ChitownbullsBG7
08-07-2008, 12:01 AM
http://www.prosportsdaily.com/forums/showthread.php?t=256664

go there...the Bulls think they have 10 players better then Haslem on their roster....:laugh:

Wait who thinks that? that was one guy so get the facts right.

daleja424
08-07-2008, 12:03 AM
Wait who thinks that? that was one guy so get the facts right.

well only two bulls fans put up rankings...and both had thabo, noah, thomas, noc, and gooden rated higher then Haslem...and no one really disagree with those two...in fact I got yelled at for thinking the opposite..

Reezy
08-07-2008, 12:03 AM
Finally people wake up and see that Live is actually pretty damn good.

daleja424
08-07-2008, 12:05 AM
Finally people wake up and see that Live is actually pretty damn good.

I think it could be sick next year... but I have always played live...

BullsNumber1Fan
08-07-2008, 12:06 AM
http://www.prosportsdaily.com/forums/showthread.php?t=256664

go there...the Bulls think they have 10 players better then Haslem on their roster....:laugh:

Ok, that's probably wrong but I'll name the one's I think are better:
Kirk Hinrich
Derrick Rose
Ben Gordon
Larry Hughes(Maybe)
Luol Deng
Andres Nocioni
Drew Gooden (Averged better #'s than Haslem while on Bulls)
Tyrus Thomas

That's 8!

King Koopa
08-07-2008, 12:10 AM
hey Daleja did you get any Infractions for the fight in the Bulls Forum.

daleja424
08-07-2008, 12:10 AM
Ok, that's probably wrong but I'll name the one's I think are better:
Kirk Hinrich
Derrick Rose
Ben Gordon
Larry Hughes(Maybe)
Luol Deng
Andres Nocioni
Drew Gooden (Averged better #'s than Haslem while on Bulls)
Tyrus Thomas

That's 8!

Hinrich- agree
rose- agree
gordon- agree
deng - agree
hughes- don't think he contributes nearly as much as haslem... so DISAGREE
Nocioni- close, but agree
Gooden - this is a push... they are about even...
Thomas- not a chance. maybe next year he will be better... but based on what thomas has done so far...haslem is better

so maybe 5.5 players... but not 10!

daleja424
08-07-2008, 12:11 AM
hey Daleja did you get any Infractions for the fight in the Bulls Forum.

nah...u?

ChitownbullsBG7
08-07-2008, 12:12 AM
TT is not better and neither is Hughes. You can make an argument for everyone else.

daleja424
08-07-2008, 12:14 AM
TT is not better and neither is Hughes. You can make an argument for everyone else.

I agree... thats why I said 5.5 :D (with Gooden being worth .5 b/c they are close)

King Koopa
08-07-2008, 12:15 AM
nah...u?

Yeah Im always the one getting in trouble for the messes you bring me into.... this is the last time i got your back.:mad: J/K I got your back.:D

LayZbone
08-07-2008, 12:15 AM
those ratings are pretty bad. Haslem is about a 78-79 in the 2K8 rating system....no way is he a 73 when he puts up 12/9....I'd put him between 75-77.

Chalmers at 65?....thats like the rating they give to Sean Marks/Yute Tabuse/Paul Shirley/Slava Medevenko type players, lol. I know he's a 2nd round player....but he was a steal, and could easily have gone mid-1st round. I'd give him a 70.

daleja424
08-07-2008, 12:16 AM
those ratings are pretty bad. Haslem is about a 78-79 in the 2K8 rating system....no way is he a 73 when he puts up 12/9....I'd put him between 75-77.

Chalmers at 65?....thats like the rating they give to Sean Marks/Yute Tabuse/Paul Shirley/Slava Medevenko type players, lol. I know he's a 2nd round player....but he was a steal, and could easily have gone mid-1st round. I'd give him a 70.

rooks alwasy get the shaft...:mad::mad::mad:

daleja424
08-07-2008, 12:17 AM
Yeah Im always the one getting in trouble for the messes you bring me into.... this is the last time i got your back.:mad: J/K I got your back.:D

:hi5:

BullsNumber1Fan
08-07-2008, 12:20 AM
Hinrich- agree
rose- agree
gordon- agree
deng - agree
hughes- don't think he contributes nearly as much as haslem... so DISAGREE
Nocioni- close, but agree
Gooden - this is a push... they are about even...
Thomas- not a chance. maybe next year he will be better... but based on what thomas has done so far...haslem is better

so maybe 5.5 players... but not 10!

You are probably right, but I still think with what Thomas does overall, he will get a better rating. Also, video games ALWAYS seem to overrate Larry Hughes, that's why I put him. So I say maybe 6.5-7. I think you guys have the 2 best players on both teams, but Deng is close behind Marion.

LayZbone
08-07-2008, 12:22 AM
TT is not better and neither is Hughes. You can make an argument for everyone else.

Agreed. Gooden averaged 12 ppg and 8.6 rpg....Haslem averaged 12/9 in a less amount of total games...but w/ more minutes. I always thought they were almost identical in skill level. They're both solid defensively too, even if the stats don't say so.

Gooden did average 14ppg/9.3rpg/1.2bpg in 18 total games as a Bull. I'd give the slight advantage to Gooden because of his height and ability to successfully play the Center position when need be. But he's not sooo much better to the point where he should be rated higher in a video game...

Think about it, the difference between a 75 rating and an 80 is BIG. At the most, Gooden can maybe be 1 rating higher....but I personally would make them the same.

BullsNumber1Fan
08-07-2008, 12:22 AM
They also underrated Wade ALOT!! I always thought he was one of the top 5 players in the NBA until he got injured. I would have to say Kobe, Lebron, CP3 are the only better players than him. He should be around a 95. Maybe he would have if he had an outside(3 pt.) shot.

LayZbone
08-07-2008, 12:26 AM
They also underrated Wade ALOT!! I always thought he was one of the top 5 players in the NBA until he got injured. I would have to say Kobe, Lebron, CP3 are the only better players than him. He should be around a 95. Maybe he would have if he had an outside(3 pt.) shot.

I'm sure it was the injuries and the fact that he didn't play much last season that his rating dropped a little. But after this coming season (judging by his TeamUSA play so far...) he'll definitely be rated higher in the next year's game. Top 5 in the NBA when completely healthy....w/o a doubt.

daleja424
08-07-2008, 12:27 AM
They also underrated Wade ALOT!! I always thought he was one of the top 5 players in the NBA until he got injured. I would have to say Kobe, Lebron, CP3 are the only better players than him. He should be around a 95. Maybe he would have if he had an outside(3 pt.) shot.

well if they would have seen the olympics b4 making the ratings he'd be a 96...but they were just looking at last years stats and not knowing if he was going to be better... maybe they'll change him b4 they release the game...

daleja424
08-07-2008, 12:27 AM
I'm sure it was the injuries and the fact that he didn't play much last season that his rating dropped a little. But after this coming season (judging by his TeamUSA play so far...) he'll definitely be rated higher in the next year's game.

haha... great minds think alike my friend!

danbola
08-07-2008, 12:45 AM
Before I can complain on any of the ratings, I'd have to see how they rated the rest of the league first. Beasley and Chalmers will probably end up outplaying their ratings, but its not realistic to rate rookies too high.

Also, I'd love to see what Blount rates.

rico
08-07-2008, 02:34 AM
those were my numbers posted on the previous page...
and i only tweaked from last years numbers up or down 1 or 2 points.

noah and TT were both 76's at the start on that game, this year i see them getting 1point better. i boosted deng up a couple points. and i put rose at 78 because if NOAH starts with 76 surely the #1 pick gets up in that region. i mean durant and oden both started at 84 on the game.

once again going by 2k8's stats. so they really arent ridiculous. 2k series for the past 8 years has been > live. so maybe live is dicking you guys around. last year they had marion at 89 or 90. and wade was a 91 93? something like that.

someone should get live 08 and compare the stats for bulls/heat.

greek miami hea
08-07-2008, 09:20 AM
damn those ratings suck. If I buy LIVE 09 I'll have to edit them. LIVE series suck. Maybe this year I'll go w/ 2K9

yea me too.but nba 2k is always better than nba live

greek miami hea
08-07-2008, 09:24 AM
nba 2k9 my predictions

haslem 80
beasley 83
marion 90
wade 95
chalmers 71
wright 77
jones.j 78
jones.b 69
zo 80
blount 70
banks 72
cook 70

CaleX(RR)MIA™
08-07-2008, 09:48 AM
i cant wait to play and go on fast breaks with Wade/Marion/Beasley :D

greek miami hea
08-07-2008, 10:15 AM
i cant wait to play and go on fast breaks with Wade/Marion/Beasley :D

me too

CaleX(RR)MIA™
08-07-2008, 10:33 AM
i think i might trade Marion tho to get some solid bench players and some one to fill his spot maybe when i get the game i will see what i can work out with atlanta to get josh smith (i hate how marion shoots in the game so easy to block!! :mad:)

DQL
08-07-2008, 10:45 AM
i think i might trade Marion tho to get some solid bench players and some one to fill his spot maybe when i get the game i will see what i can work out with atlanta to get josh smith (i hate how marion shoots in the game so easy to block!! :mad:)

yeah even players standing 10 ft apart can block his shots :mad: When the ball is in his hand I rarely take a shot. I usually attack the rim or make him a passer

DQL
08-07-2008, 10:48 AM
And I often trade for Sean Williams and Josh Smith.

CaleX(RR)MIA™
08-07-2008, 10:49 AM
yeah even players standing 10 ft apart can block his shots :mad: When the ball is in his hand I rarely take a shot. I usually attack the rim or make him a passer

me to its like shooting with him is asking to get your shot blocked the only time i do shot is when he's open in a corner for a 3 and even then i hesitate

CaleX(RR)MIA™
08-07-2008, 10:53 AM
And I often trade for Sean Williams and Josh Smith.

im thinking about doing that deal or going to portland and getting LaMarcus Aldridge and Channing Frye

noturnormalhero
08-07-2008, 10:54 AM
man..all about 2k for me. NBA live is nothing but an ugly girl with a nice outfit. The graphics and player intro grab your attention but the gameplay has always been below average in my opinion. People hate on 2k cuz of the graphics but i'd take better gameplay (especially in a sports game) over graphics anyday of the week. Again, i'll buy 2k9..play the demo of Live and prolly hate on it, and that's it.

CaleX(RR)MIA™
08-07-2008, 10:55 AM
man..all about 2k for me. NBA live is nothing but an ugly girl with a nice outfit. The graphics and player intro grab your attention but the gameplay has always been below average in my opinion. People hate on 2k cuz of the graphics but i'd take better gameplay (especially in a sports game) over graphics anyday of the week. Again, i'll buy 2k9..play the demo of Live and prolly hate on it, and that's it.

thats true i hate how in live you can just dunk all day with no effort

_Sn1P3r_
08-07-2008, 06:42 PM
Looks good Wade went down 2 i think he used to be 94, Haslem should be 79 at least

I think it's because he was injured last season.

TheHeat3
08-07-2008, 11:46 PM
man..all about 2k for me. NBA live is nothing but an ugly girl with a nice outfit. The graphics and player intro grab your attention but the gameplay has always been below average in my opinion. People hate on 2k cuz of the graphics but i'd take better gameplay (especially in a sports game) over graphics anyday of the week. Again, i'll buy 2k9..play the demo of Live and prolly hate on it, and that's it.

Same here man, I'll take gameplay over those graphics anyday. The graphics difference isn't even big too, NBA 2k9 is really stepping up in graphics as well...i actually thought this was the real Kevin Garnett for a second :D http://xbox360media.ign.com/xbox360/image/article/880/880219/nba-2k9-20080609001301328_640w.jpg
Now, ratings for Rookies usually never go any higher than the lower 80s. so based on that

my NBA 2k9 predictions are
STARTERS
PF- Beasley 80
SF- Marion 90
C- Mourning 80
PG- Chalmers 71
SG- Wade 94
BENCH
Haslem 81
Wright 75
Jones.J 75
Banks 71
Cook 70
Jones.B 69
Blount 70

DQL
08-07-2008, 11:53 PM
^ lol the graphic is incredible. I thought it was the real KG too. I must buy 2K9 this year

jdricks
08-08-2008, 05:13 PM
They are underestimating us. Everyone should be up a couple points.
Chalmers-70
Wade-95
Marion-90
Beasley-81
Haslem-81

greek miami hea
08-09-2008, 05:50 AM
everyone is underrating the heat!!!!!!!!!f@@@.we have to prove them that we are a playoff team and a team with a future!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!