PDA

View Full Version : Last piece to Bucks being actual contenders



HouRealCoach
07-18-2008, 01:33 PM
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=1710~518~2792~2178~3190~308~37 8~3242&teams=9~9~9~9~15~15~15~15&te=&cash=

J-Relo
07-18-2008, 02:18 PM
What about this trade: http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=2166~2167~1710~2792~2178&teams=15~15~21~21~21&te=&cash= (maybe +rookie)...

Rhyming Rebel
07-18-2008, 03:09 PM
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=1710~518~2792~2178~3190~308~37 8~3242&teams=9~9~9~9~15~15~15~15&te=&cash=

NO way does GS make that trade

Rhyming Rebel
07-18-2008, 03:10 PM
What about this trade: http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=2166~2167~1710~2792~2178&teams=15~15~21~21~21&te=&cash= (maybe +rookie)...

No way does the bucks make this one. Diaw is very very very overrated and MO is better than Barbosa

thornga2
07-18-2008, 04:10 PM
I could see the Bucks finding a way to do a three team deal that has them ending up with David Lee.

IndiansFan337
07-18-2008, 04:44 PM
I could see the Bucks finding a way to do a three team deal that has them ending up with David Lee.

That's the kind of player that they need. But it seems the Knicks only want to part with him in a trade that rids them of Zach Randolph. I think Villanueva would be a good fit in D'Antoni's offense. But I don't see NYK excepting a Villanueva for Lee swap.

favre_4life
07-18-2008, 05:04 PM
I don't really see either of those trades happening.

Manny Paplfavre
07-18-2008, 05:24 PM
Why would GS want Mo? They already have a better version of him (Ellis)

kingofdaburbs19
07-18-2008, 06:41 PM
No way does the bucks make this one. Diaw is very very very overrated and MO is better than Barbosa

Mo isn't better then Barbosa, if Barbosa got the playing time that Mo did he would put up better numbers, and I dont care how overated Diaw is and he isn't that overated at all but I would make any trade that would get Danny G out of a Bucks uniform

Samsin
07-19-2008, 12:10 AM
A. Theres no way GS would do that trade, maybe they would do harrington for Charlie V and Gadz.

B. Barbosa wont fit with the bucks if people think Mo is to much of a shoot first PG. Barbosa plays mostly 2 guard with the suns and he isn't a very good point guard, so i don't see the bucks being interested.

C. I have wasted my time once again looking at trades that would never happen.

RJ24_bucks
07-19-2008, 07:20 AM
Why would the Bucks take Harrington? him and CV's game are not that different ya know.. we just need a 1 defensive presence type of player. An entire different player than what the Bucks have now.. Like how we got Jefferson.

jtrinaldi
07-19-2008, 08:56 AM
A. Theres no way GS would do that trade, maybe they would do harrington for Charlie V and Gadz.

B. Barbosa wont fit with the bucks if people think Mo is to much of a shoot first PG. Barbosa plays mostly 2 guard with the suns and he isn't a very good point guard, so i don't see the bucks being interested.

C. I have wasted my time once again looking at trades that would never happen.
so did i:cry:

J-Relo
07-19-2008, 11:45 AM
B. Barbosa wont fit with the bucks if people think Mo is to much of a shoot first PG. Barbosa plays mostly 2 guard with the suns and he isn't a very good point guard, so i don't see the bucks being interested.


So he could backup Redd, as you have Sessions and just signed Lue... Somehow I really think that Mo and Bucks will part they ways, maybe not in this trade...

daleja424
07-19-2008, 02:52 PM
What about this one: Link to Trade Machine Results (http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=2178~3196~2184&teams=14~15~15&te=&cash=)

The Bucks get a true PF that has a lot of playoff expirience and good young shooter...and Miami gets the Pg they need...

Bucks:
Sessons/Lue/Bell
Redd/Cook
Jefferson/Alexander/Mason
Haslem/CV/Allen
Bogut/Gadzuric

Heat:
Williams/Chalmers/Banks
Wade/Jones
Marion/Wright/Powell
Bealsey/Lasme
Anthony/Blount/Zo

flyboy193
07-19-2008, 04:33 PM
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=1710~518~2792~2178~3190~308~37 8~3242&teams=9~9~9~9~15~15~15~15&te=&cash=

NEVER LOL:smoking:

flyboy193
07-19-2008, 04:34 PM
If yah trade mo dont yah need a point guard back

daleja424
07-19-2008, 04:46 PM
If yah trade mo dont yah need a point guard back

why? They like Sessons...and they just signed Lue and still have Bell who can play the point if needed. I dont see why they would even want another PG...

newtalker_27
07-19-2008, 05:47 PM
What about CV & Mo for Camby? Clippers need a PG & Camby would give us a big up grade at the 4. Only he is so injury prone but i think it's worth the gamble.

daleja424
07-19-2008, 06:45 PM
What about CV & Mo for Camby? Clippers need a PG & Camby would give us a big up grade at the 4. Only he is so injury prone but i think it's worth the gamble.

1) Camby is a really a center.
2) Why would you trade two like 25 year olds for ONE 34 year old?
3) The Clippers didnt bring in Camby to trade him
4) Even if they did want to trade him it would have to wait two months...

RJ24_bucks
07-20-2008, 01:18 AM
I dont like the idea of Sessions starting.. Just because he had good games in the summer league and some really good games towards the end of the season last year doesn't mean he should get the starting job right away.. especially infront of a player like Mo (Im not saying he shouldn't be traded, coz I really want Mo to be traded) I think we should still hold Sessions and let him start later.. Besides Mo will probably get injured during the upcoming season anyway, and if Sessions starts to do really good from there.. then I think we should start Sessions.. I dont wanna mess up again man.. We already did when we felt Mo was gonna be an impact on the team when we let go of TJ Ford..

wissportsfan
07-20-2008, 02:29 AM
Neither of those trades seem to fit our style.

ROY 2 MVP Braun
07-20-2008, 07:14 PM
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=366~1710~2792~2178&teams=15~7~7~7&te=&cash=
what do u guys think about this i no we got sessions and we'd be getting another shooter but it would be a big 3 for us jus like ray casell and big dog with a better supporting cast with joe and andrew

ROY 2 MVP Braun
07-20-2008, 07:14 PM
and i no its not relistic so if u wasted ure time again that sucks lmao

wissportsfan
07-20-2008, 08:06 PM
Yeah its not realistic really but I don't think we need AI on this team.

jeffb022
07-20-2008, 09:32 PM
i know that this wont happen and probably a lot of people wouldnt like redd going out the door, but hey you would get some pretty darn good young talent for what your giving up.


Detroit Pistons

Incoming Players
Charlie Villanueva
Salary: $3,448,050 Years Remaining: 1

Dan Gadzuric
Salary: $6,250,195 Years Remaining: 3

Michael Redd
Salary: $15,780,000 Years Remaining: 3


Outgoing Players: Rodney Stuckey, Antonio McDyess, Chauncey Billups, Jason MaxiellMilwaukee Bucks

Incoming Players
Rodney Stuckey
Salary: $1,687,320 Years Remaining: 1

Antonio McDyess
Salary: $6,813,050 Years Remaining: 2

Chauncey Billups
Salary: $11,050,000 Years Remaining: 4

Jason Maxiell
Salary: $1,877,572 Years Remaining: 1


Outgoing Players: Charlie Villanueva, Dan Gadzuric, Michael Redd

wissportsfan
07-21-2008, 12:28 AM
Pistons wouldn't even think about do that really.

MoJay
07-21-2008, 02:28 AM
Ya that trade is really unrealistic also but Maxiell would be nice and I also like Stuckey but I think Hammond doesn't plan on moving Redd I think he got RJ to pair him with Redd two great scorers who score their own way