Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Results 1 to 13 of 13
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    41,549

    Why the NFL Draft isn’t as important as it used to be

    Why the NFL Draft isn’t as important as it used to be

    By Ben Volin GLOBE STAFF

    APRIL 18, 2018

    With most teams busy trying to accumulate draft picks, the Patriots instead took a hard pass on the 2017 NFL Draft.

    They traded away their first-, second-, and fifth-round picks for young players with NFL experience: Brandin Cooks, Kony Ealy, and James O’Shaughnessy. Their entire draft haul consisted of a pair of third-round picks, a fourth-rounder, and a sixth-rounder.

    This year, the Rams have decided that the draft isn’t what it’s cracked up to be, either. They traded their first-round pick for Cooks, and last year they traded their 2018 second-round pick for Sammy Watkins.

    The Rams built their team the expensive way, adding several big veterans through trades and free agency: Ndamukong Suh, Aqib Talib, Marcus Peters, and more. And when the draft is held next weekend, the Rams won’t be on the board until the third round, pick No. 87.

    It’s a strategy that the Rams developed through experience — the hard way.

    “We learned this through the RG3 trade,” vice president of football operations Kevin Demoff said in February at the MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference, referring to the big 2012 trade that sent the No. 2 pick, which would become Robert Griffin III, to Washington.

    The Rams emerged from that deal with eight draft picks over three years, including five in the top two rounds. They were supposed to be locked and loaded with young talent, ready to take on the NFC for years to come.

    Six years later, only one player is left: defensive tackle Michael Brockers, he of 19 sacks in six seasons. Left tackle Greg Robinson, a No. 2 overall pick, was a huge bust and lasted just three years. Cornerback Janoris Jenkins was allowed to walk in free agency after four years. Linebacker Alec Ogletree provided five serviceable seasons, and was just traded away to the Giants. Running back Isaiah Pead and wide receiver Stedman Bailey had their careers cut short by freak accidents. Zac Stacy and Rokevious Watkins flamed out quickly. And coach Jeff Fisher was fired after five playoff-less seasons.

    The problem, the Rams found out, was that they didn’t have enough time to develop their young players, thanks to the new practice rules established by the 2011 collective bargaining agreement.

    “In the new CBA, you get such limited time with players,” Demoff said. “Going really young, I think, was easier when you had more time in the offseason, more time in training camp. We had a player last year who missed all of the offseason because he didn’t graduate until late, and he had 10 practices until the preseason opener.

    “It’s great to have picks, but even if you hit on them, how they develop is so much harder now. You don’t necessarily have three years to develop these guys.”

    The NFL Draft is still important, of course. But the reasons have changed under the new CBA. And a good case can be made that the draft just isn’t as important as it used to be.

    “I still think [building through the draft] is the best way to go, but you’ve got a lot more options now, and it’s not the only way to go and the only way to win,” former Eagles president Joe Banner said.

    The biggest change in today’s NFL: Time, not money, is the scarce resource.

    In the pre-2011 NFL, when teams held 50-odd full-contact practices before the start of the season and salary-cap space was tight, signing expensive free agents and eschewing the draft was the quickest way to miss the playoffs (just ask the early 2000s Redskins). There was almost no debate across the league that the best method for building a roster was to draft and develop.

    “There was a correlation for many years between the teams that had the most draft picks and the teams that were the most successful — Pittsburgh, the Patriots, Eagles, Ravens,” said Banner, whose team reached the playoffs 11 times between 1995-2012. “Those were the teams that were leading the draft every year.”

    But the new CBA has shifted the dynamic, making veterans more valuable and rookies less so.

    The biggest reason has been the reduction in practice time. Teams used to hold full-contact practices in the offseason, two-a-days during training camp, and had no limitations on full-contact practices during the regular season.

    But under the new CBA, spring practices are strictly regulated with no contact, no pads, and only four hours per day at the facility. Two-a-days in training camp have been eliminated, and teams can hold only 14 padded practices throughout the entire regular season.

    These restrictions are great for the players’ health and safety, but terrible for developing young players — especially those that play in college offenses that don’t translate to the NFL.

    “It’s definitely a big problem,” an NFC general manager said. “It’s just a lot harder to develop players, especially if you’re starting over with a new coaching staff and trying to implement a new system.”

    Demoff said that the Rams ran a study, and concluded that it now takes players about three years to have the same amount of practice time they would have gotten in one year under the old CBA.

    Young players usually get a couple of years to prove themselves, but if they don’t make immediate contributions, teams move on quickly.

    “It’s not baseball, where you have the minor leagues and then six years of service,” Demoff said. “So if you go really young, you’re not finding out until Year 3 or 4 if they’re any good, and then you’re paying market rate for them.”

    The RG3 trade loaded up the Rams with young talent, but, said Demoff, “We looked at it as [we needed] a better balance. We were the youngest team in the league for four years, five years, but you have to find those veterans to plug in.”

    Offensive linemen used to be the easiest and safest players to project to the NFL, but in the last five years, top-10 picks Luke Joeckel, Jonathan Cooper, Chance Warmack, Ereck Flowers, and Robinson have all been busts.

    “It went from the easiest and safest pick to one where we’ve seen a lot of misses,” Banner said. “Now, does that mean things have really changed, or it’s just we’re in a down cycle at the moment? I don’t know, but there is no doubt that there are some positions in the league that had a higher batting average, and that doesn’t seem to be as true anymore.”

    And the Patriots also love to flip their mid- and late-round picks — which have a lower chance of becoming NFL players — for established players. This year they got Danny Shelton, Cordarrelle Patterson, and a sixth-round pick all for a 2019 third-rounder. They traded a sixth for cornerback Jason McCourty and a seventh. They traded a seventh for linebacker Marquis Flowers.

    The Patriots enter next week’s draft with five picks in the top 95, but they traded away all four of their picks in the fourth and fifth rounds.

    “They’re trading a fourth-round draft pick, where you have a 15 percent chance of having a good starter coming out of the fourth round, for guys that are already established as good players,” Banner said. “How can that not be smart?”

    The other big change in today’s NFL is that the league is awash in salary-cap space. The cap has consistently risen by $10 million-$12 million each year, from $123 million in 2013 to $177.2 million in 2018, thanks to an influx of TV money. And the new CBA allows teams to roll over any unused cap space to the next year (the Browns rolled over $58.9 million this year). The 49ers entered the offseason with more than $100 million in cap space, while 20 teams had $20 million in space, and 12 teams had $40 million.

    So adding a veteran — or two, or five — isn’t as cost-prohibitive as it used to be. The Eagles just won the Super Bowl with free agents Alshon Jeffery, LeGarrette Blount, Chris Long, Timmy Jernigan, and Torrey Smith all playing crucial roles. Their opponents, the Patriots, also went with the veteran approach, and haven’t used a first-round pick since 2015.

    And the trade market has exploded, as teams are getting wise to the Patriots’ young-veteran philosophy, and because of all the salary-cap space. There have been 21 trades this calendar year, compared with 10 through this time last year, and four in 2016. Taking on veteran contracts, or dead money to get rid of a veteran contract, isn’t a big deal anymore.

    “The cap used to be so tight that teams couldn’t even contemplate taking a veteran on that was making any real money,” Banner said. “Now the huge amounts of cap room that most teams have changes both the value of veterans players making a lot of money, and draft picks.”

    The draft may not be as important as it used to be, but it still carries plenty of weight. Teams can punt on the draft once or twice, but they can’t continually ignore it. The Patriots are reversing course this year and loading up with multiple picks in each of the first two rounds.

    But whereas draft picks used to be counted on to be the cornerstone of a team, now they are viewed more as low-cost and fill-in-the-gap type players. The new CBA instituted a new rookie wage scale that has made most rookies tremendous values — locked in at below-market rates for four seasons.

    With most starting quarterbacks now making $20-plus million, Jameis Winston has a cap number of $8.06 million this year. Trey Flowers, the Patriots’ terrific young defensive end, made about $2.1 million in his first three seasons combined, and will make $1.9 million this year.

    “Long-term, you can’t balance the economics without a fair number of these younger players coming in and making a difference and playing and being less expensive,” Banner said.

    But with teams awash in cap space, and young players not getting the coaching and development that they need, the importance of the draft just isn’t what it used to be.

    “I’m never going to join the school that thinks trading away all your draft picks is a smart thing to do,” Banner said. “But I’m saying relative to where it was six, seven years ago, when teams desperately needed those picks to just manage their cap, those picks have lost a bit of their value. That’s the underlying change in how some teams are building their rosters."
    https://www.bostonglobe.com/sports/p...rsI/story.html


    "You don't know how to drink. Your whole generation, you drink for the wrong reasons. My generation, we drink because it's good, because it feels better than unbuttoning your collar, because we deserve it. We drink because it's what men do."

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    41,549
    The problem with this article is that the Eagles built their team through the draft, the Rams and Patriots haven't.
    Plus the Rams drafted their FQB.


    "You don't know how to drink. Your whole generation, you drink for the wrong reasons. My generation, we drink because it's good, because it feels better than unbuttoning your collar, because we deserve it. We drink because it's what men do."

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    [emoji288]
    Posts
    11,161
    The importance of the draft is relative.

    It is certainly true that veterans can be more valuable now, but that's because the rookie wage scale has lowered their salary, as the increased the demand for younger players on their cheap rookie contracts has lowered demand for veterans, thereby making them cheaper as well.

    It is also true that draft picks have become a little too overrated. It makes sense to trade the chance of acquiring a good player for an actually existing good player, but then that is again relative, when for example looking at the 2017 Saints draft class, whose first 4 picks have all turned out to be good players, or better.

    I'd say a good mixture of both is best: a solid core of drafted and re-signed players, augmented with a rotating handful of good players from draft picks and expensive free agent contracts, and depth built through both resources as well, but from mid/late round picks and cheap free agent contracts.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    2,830
    I have been saying that the lack of practice time makes it very difficult to make changes of any kind whether bringing in a veteran or rookie. They don't get time to fit into the system. Pre season games are the only practice they get and also have to serve as the time to evaluate players to cut down the rosters. Starters don't play much so coaches don't see rookies playing against the best players. I also suspect that the lack of conditioning and contact in training camps is contributing to injuries. Starting quarterbacks and receivers don't get to work together until the season starts. It might be a 16 game season but the first 4 are like pre season games for the starters.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    2,586
    Quote Originally Posted by Claymation View Post
    The problem with this article is that the Eagles built their team through the draft, the Rams and Patriots haven't.
    Plus the Rams drafted their FQB.
    Yep. Wentz, Foles, Agholor, Ertz, Clement, Barnett, Elliott, BG, Cox, Mills, Kelce, Lane, Celek all built through the draft.

    The return... 2018-19

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    19,324
    I still think the draft is the best way to build your team, but bringing in a some veteran players is key as well.
    For years the Packers have been building pretty much solely through the draft and I think it has hurt them big time. On the rare occasion they did sign or trade for a veteran (Woodson, Pickett, Peppers) it usually greatly improved their team.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    South Dakota
    Posts
    6,758
    Quote Originally Posted by Young$avage View Post
    Yep. Wentz, Foles, Agholor, Ertz, Clement, Barnett, Elliott, BG, Cox, Mills, Kelce, Lane, Celek all built through the draft.
    Same with the Vikings....other than QB, virtually completely built thru the draft
    Use the draft to build your team, sign FAs to fill in for mistakes/issues/holes not filled in those drafts.
    gotta love 'referential' treatment

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    46,184
    Quote Originally Posted by SiteWolf View Post
    Same with the Vikings....other than QB, virtually completely built thru the draft
    Use the draft to build your team, sign FAs to fill in for mistakes/issues/holes not filled in those drafts.
    This.

    Also the issue the article talks about of less practice time means it's harder to integrate these guys is why I hate the new CBA. And I said this was going to happen and people insisted it was going to be fine. It's now. So I think we're going to see more teams try to enshrew the draft if they don't love players, and the teams getting those picks will benefit. Yea the teams with more picks might not see their impact now but in 2-4 years when the other team is seeing cap problems, the one that took the picks will be in a great place.

    PROCESSING

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Rhode Island
    Posts
    32,472
    As others have said, it's all relative. I also like to avoid sweeping generalizations. Specifically to the Pats references, I don't think the trades last year were a philosophy that they don't believe in building through the draft. It was a series of trades where the value lined up. Compared to this year to where the value lined up to having more picks.


    NE Patriots Forum HOF (Class of 2011)

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    46,184
    Quote Originally Posted by hugepatsfan View Post
    As others have said, it's all relative. I also like to avoid sweeping generalizations. Specifically to the Pats references, I don't think the trades last year were a philosophy that they don't believe in building through the draft. It was a series of trades where the value lined up. Compared to this year to where the value lined up to having more picks.
    I think that and a bit of a 'win now mentality'. For a team looking to build something sustainable (Bears, Bills, Jets, Browns) trading away those picks don't help them. For the teams looking to win now (Pats for Brady, Rams because key players are cheap) then giving away picks for proven talent is worth it.

    PROCESSING

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Bethlehem
    Posts
    37,681
    Quote Originally Posted by Young$avage View Post
    Yep. Wentz, Foles, Agholor, Ertz, Clement, Barnett, Elliott, BG, Cox, Mills, Kelce, Lane, Celek all built through the draft.
    While technically true, he was on THIS team as a FA. Elliot also wasn't drafted by the Eagles.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jack of Blades View Post
    I don't consider Brand New indie. I consider them ****ing awesome and don't belong to a genre.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    2,586
    Quote Originally Posted by koldjerky View Post
    While technically true, he was on THIS team as a FA. Elliot also wasn't drafted by the Eagles.
    Fair enough.

    The return... 2018-19

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    41,549
    Quote Originally Posted by warfelg View Post
    This.

    Also the issue the article talks about of less practice time means it's harder to integrate these guys is why I hate the new CBA. And I said this was going to happen and people insisted it was going to be fine. It's now. So I think we're going to see more teams try to enshrew the draft if they don't love players, and the teams getting those picks will benefit. Yea the teams with more picks might not see their impact now but in 2-4 years when the other team is seeing cap problems, the one that took the picks will be in a great place.
    It's why teams are struggling to develop OL, that and the college moving towards spread/Air Raid offenses. OL in these schemes aren't asked to maintain a block more than 3 seconds.


    "You don't know how to drink. Your whole generation, you drink for the wrong reasons. My generation, we drink because it's good, because it feels better than unbuttoning your collar, because we deserve it. We drink because it's what men do."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •