Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345
Results 61 to 68 of 68
  1. #61
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Where the smog meets the shore
    Posts
    40,792
    Quote Originally Posted by SpecialFNK View Post
    if that is all they were doing then it would not be an issue. I would think it should be obvious to everyone that this media has an agenda, and has no problem saying whatever they want. how many stories need to be wrong before your side starts to think maybe this media shouldn't be trusted? forget that many in the media were exposed helping Hillary, and still covering Trump, just look at how many stories have been wrong. look at some of the stories in what they will use to attack Trump, including handshakes and scoops of ice cream.



    http://torontosun.com/2017/05/19/don...b-78938480d054




    even if he has deserved some or even a lot of the negative coverage that he has gotten, this left leaning media has hit Trump on anything and everything they can.
    They have an agenda, or standards for what they expect from the leader of a free country? He provides daily fodder to be hit with. It's not like "the media" (which you rely on for every link you share when it serves your purpose btw) really needs to look far when he purposes tweets something divisive or immature or idiotic every day to get attention.

    And just exactly how many stories of Trump were wrong? Because the meaningful things seem to stick (not he tabloid fish feeding in Japan nonsense)

  2. #62
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    14,638
    Quote Originally Posted by GGGGG-Men View Post
    They have an agenda, or standards for what they expect from the leader of a free country? He provides daily fodder to be hit with. It's not like "the media" (which you rely on for every link you share when it serves your purpose btw) really needs to look far when he purposes tweets something divisive or immature or idiotic every day to get attention.

    And just exactly how many stories of Trump were wrong? Because the meaningful things seem to stick (not he tabloid fish feeding in Japan nonsense)
    but that is where the left takes it to far... trying to make a story out of nothing... it hurts their cause and feeds right into narrative of being treated unfairly...

    there is plenty to ***** about when it comes to Trump that is legit... there is no need to pile on just to pile on...

  3. #63
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Where the smog meets the shore
    Posts
    40,792
    Quote Originally Posted by Vinylman View Post
    but that is where the left takes it to far... trying to make a story out of nothing... it hurts their cause and feeds right into narrative of being treated unfairly...

    there is plenty to ***** about when it comes to Trump that is legit... there is no need to pile on just to pile on...
    You'd think they'd have learned from the GOP in the 2016 election; chasing every stupid thing that comes up gets nowhere. You have to drill home one message over and over (like "lock her up"....mindless, simple, irregardless of facts....just sell the message).

  4. #64
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    right here
    Posts
    17,517
    Quote Originally Posted by GGGGG-Men View Post
    They have an agenda, or standards for what they expect from the leader of a free country? He provides daily fodder to be hit with. It's not like "the media" (which you rely on for every link you share when it serves your purpose btw) really needs to look far when he purposes tweets something divisive or immature or idiotic every day to get attention.

    And just exactly how many stories of Trump were wrong? Because the meaningful things seem to stick (not he tabloid fish feeding in Japan nonsense)
    there was a recent story with NBC about Trump and nukes. Mattis confirmed that NBC was wrong.
    https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-arsena-243680
    Mattis calls NBC News report on nuclear arsenal 'absolutely false'
    before Comey was set to testify CNN said Comey was going to refute Trump, then when that was false they had to issue a correction.
    http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefi...icts-reporting
    CNN issues correction after Comey statement contradicts reporting
    there was a story back around the time Comey was fired that said he requested more funds. the new FBI directer Andrew McCabe testified that that was not true.

    the media said that Rod Rosenstein threatened to quit, then Rosenstein said that was not true.

    I don't know the accuracy of all listed here, but there are many listed here..
    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tr...rticle/2615652


    there have been numerous stories from media like Washington Post or New York Times that will use unnamed sources, and then also often when it comes to certain information it's the reporters/journalists only being told over the phone and they do not actually SEE what it is they are reporting on. why should that be considered reputable.
    Last edited by SpecialFNK; 11-15-2017 at 11:21 AM.



  5. #65
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Where the smog meets the shore
    Posts
    40,792
    Quote Originally Posted by SpecialFNK View Post
    there was a recent story with NBC about Trump and nukes. Mattis confirmed that NBC was wrong.
    https://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-arsena-243680


    before Comey was set to testify CNN said Comey was going to refute Trump, then when that was false they had to issue a correction.
    http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefi...icts-reporting


    there was a story back around the time Comey was fired that said he requested more funds. the new FBI directer Andrew McCabe testified that that was not true.

    the media said that Rod Rosenstein threatened to quit, then Rosenstein said that was not true.

    I don't know the accuracy of all listed here, but there are many listed here..
    http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/tr...rticle/2615652


    there have been numerous stories from media like Washington Post or New York Times that will use unnamed sources, and then also often when it comes to certain information it's the reporters/journalists only being told over the phone and they do not actually SEE what it is they are reporting on. why should that be considered reputable.
    Right, no doubt at all that the media is jumpy with him, more so than anyone else given that he floods Twitter with material, but I guess my point is the number of legitimate accusatory stories seem to be far greater than the knee-jerk false/exaggerated stuff....and I guess at the center of it all is the Russia case which is really TBD, despite right or left leaning media who have acquitted or hanged him already.

  6. #66
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    America
    Posts
    77,292
    Quote Originally Posted by GGGGG-Men View Post
    You'd think they'd have learned from the GOP in the 2016 election; chasing every stupid thing that comes up gets nowhere. You have to drill home one message over and over (like "lock her up"....mindless, simple, irregardless of facts....just sell the message).
    Yep. The crowds of fools from both sides want something simple to understand. If you tell them Clinton is the devil, they will vote against the devil. They don't want competence. They don't want sanity. They don't want respectability. They want chanting. They want simple. They want sureness.

  7. #67
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    14,638
    Quote Originally Posted by GGGGG-Men View Post
    You'd think they'd have learned from the GOP in the 2016 election; chasing every stupid thing that comes up gets nowhere. You have to drill home one message over and over (like "lock her up"....mindless, simple, irregardless of facts....just sell the message).
    Yep...


    However, The dems problem is they had a candidate with a LOOOOOOONG Record she couldn't run away from combined with the fact that she was about as inspiring as a turd...

    HRC is the type of person you have stop by your house and water your plants and pick up the mail while you are away for a month... she really had zero vision...

    And no... I am not comparing her to Trump who has all his faults and scabs... just making observations about HRC

  8. #68
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    The Boogie Down
    Posts
    90,558
    Rand Paul is good, he added his Obamacare bing to the gop tax bill, he will be alright.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 345

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •