With the Wiggins to MIN trade being official, and with the Wiggins vs Parker debate being a popular ticket item dating back to a year ago, I wanted to ask the masses who they thought was in a better position moving forward for the next 7ish years with their respective teams. (Better position for the player mostly, not for their respective teams).
Wiggins is now in Minnesota, he has a few young players next to him that are locked in long-term (Bennett, Lavine, Dieng) along with Rubio who's future is up in the air. Minnesota's in the western conference and has Flip Saunders currently as their coach (correct me if I'm wrong on that).
Parker is in Milwaukee and the weaker eastern conference, he has a few young players himself next to him in Antetokounmpo and Henson. Milwaukee just fired their old HC Drew in order to come to terms with Jason Kidd.
So, who does everyone think is in a better position? Why? Is that a question that really should be split into two parts, better position this upcoming season and then better position 5+ years from now? Is there any other particular variable that hasn't been mentioned yet that tips the scale towards one player or the other?