Last edited by South Side Sox; 08-17-2014 at 09:21 PM.
Luck? You gotta be kidding.
I mean I think it's a valid point in that a 7 game series isn't the best way to determine who is a better team after a 162 game season. There's a reason the best team doesn't always win, but thrn agai you can say that about all sports
Well, following sports in general is kind of weird, I have no impact on the play of my team, if they win, my satisfaction comes from someone else that I will never meet doing well. I don't know....
Idgaf....what do you expect? A 162 game playoff tournament?
It is what it is.
It's not just luck
It's a 162 game season, that's enduring as hell.
So to make the playoffs is a pretty special event (or should be considered one)
And winning in the post-season isn't entirely luck. The sample sets are microscopic compared to the rest of the season, but it's all about timing. Whoever plays the best in October, and was a good team all season long, is who wins your championship.
There's also the assembly of the team, having the depth to manage injuries, and the execution of positive play by players, and often times not by guys you relied on all season, but often times it's a bench guy stepping up.
It's not just luck, but luck helps. It's about timing and execution and being a good team already.
Which is why they shouldn't expand the amount of teams in the playoffs. It is rigorous and hard to make the playoffs and therefore any team that makes it deserves that chance at a championship. By allowing more teams in it certainly allows for more fluke teams.
Or just have the teams play every night rather than every other night in the playoffs and make it a Best-Of-11 series...
TC first of all its not luck, secondly your detailed analysis on why you think that in your original post is mind blowing.
Striving for a kinder, gentler PhillyFaninLA
Of course there has to be some luck to make the playoffs. Primarily, injuries. Other than that, the best teams for that season are usually in place to win the WS.
All sports involve some luck.
I hate when fans cry about injuries to their team as the reason their team was bad in a given year.
It's your GM's job to have more than adequate depth to survive injuries.
Not going after you here Thawv. Just a pet peeve. Last year, Dodger fans were so bad about it during the NLCS, yet the Cardinals had the same injury problems.
In 2011, Giants fans complained about all of their injuries as their reasoning for not defending their title.
(note, I'm not trying to call out any specific fans here). It's just a pet peeve of mine to have people blame their seasons woes on injuries.