Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





View Poll Results: What grade would you give Hinrich for this past season?

Voters
15. You may not vote on this poll
  • A

    0 0%
  • B

    2 13.33%
  • C

    5 33.33%
  • D

    7 46.67%
  • F

    1 6.67%
Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    26,014
    vCash
    54192

    2014 Report Card: Kirk Hinrich

    We've done it before, you know what to do. If not, simply vote for the grade that you'd give the Bull in the thread title on their production/impact they've had this past season. Feel free to argue your point and mention a +/- if the raw grade score isn't exact for you. We're going in order of most minutes played for the Bulls. Next up, what report card grade would you give Kirk Hinrich this past season?

    Kirk Hinrich
    9.1ppg 2.6rpg 3.9apg 0.4bpg 1.1spg
    49.4ts% 5.2trb% 22.6ast% 15.1tov% 17.3usg% 100 ORtg
    10.8 PER .085 WS/48


    Tom Thibodeau - A
    Joakim Noah - A
    Jimmy Butler - B-
    Mike Dunleavy - B
    Taj Gibson - B
    Carlos Boozer - D-

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    6 minutes away from United Center
    Posts
    38,060
    vCash
    4409
    B for Belongs on the Bench

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    12,511
    vCash
    1500
    F for get the F out

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    2,849
    vCash
    1500
    C for Can't wait to see you in an actual backup role.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,393
    vCash
    1500

    2014 Report Card: Kirk Hinrich

    D for d-rose's *****

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    26,014
    vCash
    54192
    i'm torn between a C-/D+; his efficiency was just terrible, one of the worst on the team. And while he was put into a situation he shouldn't have been in, for someone that's supposed to make open shots and run an efficient offense, he left a lot to be desired for his own offensive production this past season

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    12,511
    vCash
    1500
    I understand kirk shouldn't be in that position but as a player who was a starting point guard all his career...he was really pathetic.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    16,018
    vCash
    1500
    D, again being nice. Offensively was abysmal and defensively didn't impress me one bit either.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Chi Town
    Posts
    236
    vCash
    1500
    D for Don't start him again!

    In the Washington playoff series, he proved that he is only fit to be a back up player in this league.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    4,586
    vCash
    1650
    c -


    Only Boozer should get a D. (Really a F IMO)

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    8,367
    vCash
    1800
    Quote Originally Posted by Shammyguy3 View Post
    i'm torn between a C-/D+; his efficiency was just terrible, one of the worst on the team. And while he was put into a situation he shouldn't have been in, for someone that's supposed to make open shots and run an efficient offense, he left a lot to be desired for his own offensive production this past season
    Same. It's a close call. Honestly, it's pretty easy to justify a D+....but I'm gonna give him the lowest C- as possible.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    26,014
    vCash
    54192
    any other votes?!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •