Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





View Poll Results: What grade would you give Hinrich for this past season?

Voters
15. You may not vote on this poll
  • A

    0 0%
  • B

    2 13.33%
  • C

    5 33.33%
  • D

    7 46.67%
  • F

    1 6.67%
Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    29,769
    vCash
    56200

    2014 Report Card: Kirk Hinrich

    We've done it before, you know what to do. If not, simply vote for the grade that you'd give the Bull in the thread title on their production/impact they've had this past season. Feel free to argue your point and mention a +/- if the raw grade score isn't exact for you. We're going in order of most minutes played for the Bulls. Next up, what report card grade would you give Kirk Hinrich this past season?

    Kirk Hinrich
    9.1ppg 2.6rpg 3.9apg 0.4bpg 1.1spg
    49.4ts% 5.2trb% 22.6ast% 15.1tov% 17.3usg% 100 ORtg
    10.8 PER .085 WS/48


    Tom Thibodeau - A
    Joakim Noah - A
    Jimmy Butler - B-
    Mike Dunleavy - B
    Taj Gibson - B
    Carlos Boozer - D-

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    6 minutes away from United Center
    Posts
    42,721
    vCash
    4409
    B for Belongs on the Bench



  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    14,129
    vCash
    1500
    F for get the F out

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    3,842
    vCash
    1400
    C for Can't wait to see you in an actual backup role.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    2,192
    vCash
    1500

    2014 Report Card: Kirk Hinrich

    D for d-rose's *****

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    29,769
    vCash
    56200
    i'm torn between a C-/D+; his efficiency was just terrible, one of the worst on the team. And while he was put into a situation he shouldn't have been in, for someone that's supposed to make open shots and run an efficient offense, he left a lot to be desired for his own offensive production this past season

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    14,129
    vCash
    1500
    I understand kirk shouldn't be in that position but as a player who was a starting point guard all his career...he was really pathetic.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    16,166
    vCash
    1500
    D, again being nice. Offensively was abysmal and defensively didn't impress me one bit either.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Chi Town
    Posts
    372
    vCash
    1500
    D for Don't start him again!

    In the Washington playoff series, he proved that he is only fit to be a back up player in this league.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    5,933
    vCash
    1600
    c -


    Only Boozer should get a D. (Really a F IMO)

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    12,334
    vCash
    1800
    Quote Originally Posted by Shammyguy3 View Post
    i'm torn between a C-/D+; his efficiency was just terrible, one of the worst on the team. And while he was put into a situation he shouldn't have been in, for someone that's supposed to make open shots and run an efficient offense, he left a lot to be desired for his own offensive production this past season
    Same. It's a close call. Honestly, it's pretty easy to justify a D+....but I'm gonna give him the lowest C- as possible.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    29,769
    vCash
    56200
    any other votes?!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •