OK, Jordan went through 3 different stages.
the first being the ascention into legendary status from 86-90
the second being his prime in which IMO we can all agree were his GOD like years making him the GOAT
the third being the end of MJ from 95-98 which was still incredible
My question is between his incredible 86-90 run VS the end MJ that was more post up mid range with more iq, smarter defense ..but much less athleticism. who do you take and why?
NOTE: for stat people**
The second question is for people who base all their opinions on a player on stats. This topic alone should be enough evidence that numbers aren't all its about in sports when judging talent.. maybe in math class or school. but not in sports. jordans stats from 86-90 were leaps and bounds better than his others. But his best years were from 90-93 (coincidentally his rings came those years too)