Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 1 of 17 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 241
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    15,536
    vCash
    1500

    ESPN Ranks Team Rosters

    Who is too high.....who is too low?

    1. Seattle
    2. San Francisco
    3. Denver
    4. New Orleans
    5. Philly
    6. New England
    7. Cinci
    8. Green Bay
    9. Arizona
    10. Kansas City
    11. Detroit
    12. Indianapolis
    13. Miami
    14. San Diego
    15. Chicago
    16. Baltimore
    17. Tampa Bay
    18. Dallas
    19. New York Giants
    20. Buffalo
    21. Tennessee
    22. Carolina
    23. New York Jets
    24. Cleveland
    25. Houston
    26. Washington
    27. Pittsburgh
    28. Oakland
    29. Minnesota
    30. Atlanta
    31. St. Louis
    32. Jacksonville
    2014 Adopt-A-Lion: Golden Tate

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Norcal transplant on central Oregon Coast
    Posts
    11,136
    vCash
    1500
    Rams are way too low. Laughably low really

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    15,536
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by OREcoast49er View Post
    Rams are way too low. Laughably low really
    Yeah. I'm not as high on the Rams as most seem to be but I definitely agree. Wayyyyyy too low.
    2014 Adopt-A-Lion: Golden Tate

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Silverdale, Wa
    Posts
    8,751
    vCash
    1500
    KC seems a tad too high
    Quote Originally Posted by nessythegreat View Post
    This is getting old. Enough is enough. Redskin Is not offensive and it will never change.
    Quote Originally Posted by Norm View Post
    I want to start a website where people who say this video tape themselves going up to Native Americans and go "hey what's up redskin?" and then upload what happens.

    I'll call it WhatsUpRedskin.com



    You want to go first?
    I fully support this future site.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Silverdale, Wa
    Posts
    8,751
    vCash
    1500
    St Louis is way too low, but I'm not high on them either.
    Quote Originally Posted by nessythegreat View Post
    This is getting old. Enough is enough. Redskin Is not offensive and it will never change.
    Quote Originally Posted by Norm View Post
    I want to start a website where people who say this video tape themselves going up to Native Americans and go "hey what's up redskin?" and then upload what happens.

    I'll call it WhatsUpRedskin.com



    You want to go first?
    I fully support this future site.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    7,240
    vCash
    1500
    Given that it's ESPN, I was expecting Pittsburgh to be lower.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    8,785
    vCash
    1500
    Philly, New England and Green Bay are all too high.
    2014 Bulls Forum NBA Redraft Champions!

    PG: Jose Calderon / Aaron Brooks
    SG: Wesley Mathews / Tony Wroten
    SF: Chandler Parsons / Andrei Kirilenko
    PF: LaMarcus Aldridge / Kyle O'Quinn
    C: Roy Hibbert / Kelly Olynyk

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    connecticut
    Posts
    21,779
    vCash
    1500
    St. Louis is to low but that's my only issue for the most part

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Durango, Colorado
    Posts
    3,908
    vCash
    3681
    that st. louis ranking is a travesty

    put them in the NFC east last year and they win that division easily imho

    Philly is too high, we havent proven **** yet, borderline top ten is arguable but unless Chip Kelly counts as part of the roster top 5 is a joke.... until after this season of course

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Lancaster, Pa
    Posts
    16,391
    vCash
    3425
    Wow did Pittsburgh get **** on. I bet they win the SB now. Usually do when ESPN thinks that little of them.
    Coulson Lives

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    7,560
    vCash
    1500
    Wow, I'd take St. Louis at least near 15.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    3,658
    vCash
    1500
    Think Cinci is too high.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    California
    Posts
    2,382
    vCash
    1500
    Pitt at 27?! LOL that is something else. Why would ESPN talk trash about Pitt going 8-8 if they have the 27th ranked roster. Sounds like they're a bunch or overachievers
    TWINSIES!!

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Arvada, Colorado
    Posts
    18,340
    vCash
    653
    Philly and NO seem too high to me, but maybe I'm forgetting some quality accusations that either had.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Posts
    1,531
    vCash
    500
    As I understand it, these rankings are based solely on the ratings from PFF (stats mixed with subjective evaluation) for the starting players on each roster.

    Of course there are going to be flaws with that methodology, mainly that how well a team plays together isn't factored in at all. Also, if a top player were to go down due to injury that alone would cause the team to fall a couple of ranks, which is accurate sometimes -- sometimes not.

    I guess the Eagles are ranked so high, because several players had crazy stats last year, e.g. Foles, McCoy, Boykin, ...

Page 1 of 17 12311 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •