In another thread from earlier in the year somebody responded to the compariaon with "more like Karl Malone .5". Going through the numbers you may be very surprised.
Blake: 24/10/3.5. PER of 24.3, TS% of 59, WS/48 of .215. Offensive rating of 115, DRTG of 103.
Malone: 25.5/11/2.5. PER of 20.7, TS% of 57, WS/48 of .152. Offensive rating of 107, DRTG of 101.
Malone attempted 2 more shots per game PER 36, which accounts for the 1.4 ppg extra.
Does anybody think this is a bad comparison? Or is anybody surprised that statistically Blake is superior? Now... Blake will never have the longevity or overall career of Malone IMO, but looks like the comparison pre draft was warranted.