Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





View Poll Results: What should Tony Parker have done on the last play?

Voters
15. You may not vote on this poll
  • Take the shot because it's a layup and he's got Zeller beat.

    5 33.33%
  • Take the shot because the EPV is 1.36.

    1 6.67%
  • Pass the ball because his teammate is open.

    4 26.67%
  • Pass the ball because the EPV jumps to 1.75.

    5 33.33%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    20,619
    vCash
    1000

    "DataBall" vs. Old School (Real World Example Spurs vs. Cavs)

    http://grantland.com/features/expect...nba-analytics/

    After Duncanís screen frees up Parker to attack Zeller, EPV actually decreases as Parker penetrates through the midrange closely marked by Zeller. But as he gets close to the basket, the EPV surges to 1.36. Parkerís dribble drive has already elevated that value of the possession by 0.39 points ó but heís not done. He increases the value of the play further when he fires that crazy baseline pass to Leonard, standing open in the corner. EPV accounts for both Leonardís great corner shooting prowess and that he is wide open. As a result, the EPV peaks at 1.75 as Parker throws the game-winning assist. There is a slight decrease in value, to 1.58, as Dion Waiters frantically attempts to close out Leonard, but Waiters is too late.

    The article itself could probably spur (no pun intended) another 2-3 threads (like Ricky Rubio being the worst player in the NBA last season by EPV) but for now what jumped out to me was the fact that statistically the article promotes the value of the 3 but personally I would much rather Parker have gone up with the layup.

    The Spurs were down 2 with 9.5 seconds left to play.

    Should Parker have shot the ball or passed to Leonard?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,120
    vCash
    1500
    As a coach im telling drive and take the easy 2 if its open but at the same time i say if you drive and get doubled dont be afraid to kick it to the open man...i dont think numbers has to do with much this type of play happens all the time you just take the better more open shot in my opinion...if you have video of the specific play id like to watch it\

    EDIT: after watching the play that was a great written play by POP he had 3 options on the play from the get go...
    He ran the pick and roll with Duncan they decided to stay on parker while Duncan rolled but he wasnt able to pass it off then the 3rd option is Leonard in the corner so if Waiters gets lost/goes to help on defense which he obviously did then Parker could kick it out for the winner which happened...overall amazing play if you watch it
    Last edited by theducksmuggler; 02-07-2014 at 07:55 AM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    LI-NY
    Posts
    23,382
    vCash
    1500
    Turning every moment of a basketball game into a series of numbers is such a stupid exercise.
    The value of elite scoring ability, by Phil Jackson:

    "This is a guy, we recognize his talent, and his skill is the kind of skill and talent that gets you through playoff games where things get sticky, grind-out, and basketball becomes a force game and suddenly you need to have a player who has the capabilities of scoring with someone hanging on them in a situation thatís critical. Heís one of those players, one of the few players who can do that.Ē

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Windsor, Earth's Rectum (as reported by Stephen Colbert).
    Posts
    7,756
    vCash
    1500
    This is interesting.

    I say drive at Zeller, because you have a chance to draw a foul that was as well, and a foul + 2 is better than +2 when that +2 can miss either way.

    I realize the numbers you give likely account for the foul and additional free-throw, but I value the ACTUAL foul. Especially if you are playing against a team whose big man is crucial (not Zellar).

    In those instances, in terms of simply converting a basket, it is essentially up to the player. Some you trust, some you don't. Parker I'd trust. Chris Paul I'd trust. Jose Calderon I trust (I'm not just speaking to elite PGs here), Brandon Jennings.... I DO NOT TRUST!

    Some guys have good judgement, some don't.
    What the eye doesn't see and the mind doesn't know, doesn't exist.
    Follow me on Twitter and I'll follow back: @JasonJHorn

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    33,406
    vCash
    1000
    Quote Originally Posted by D-Leethal View Post
    Turning every moment of a basketball game into a series of numbers is such a stupid exercise.
    Not if it helps you win. But these #s are only decently telling.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    LI-NY
    Posts
    23,382
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by John Walls Era View Post
    Not if it helps you win. But these #s are only decently telling.
    I'm all for teams hiring analytical departments for stuff like this. You have the resources and should have as much information as you can as a half a billion dollar business. As a fan, its incredibly underwhelming to me. I appreciate the ambiguities of the game, I don't want to try and eliminate them.

    What I got most out of this, is that even when you break down a possession statistically you are still going to leave out key parts of the play statistically and you are still not properly weighing each part of the play statistically. The Duncan screen was arguably the most important part of the play and Duncan gets zilch, Parkers penetration and collapsing of the defense only gets him an assist in the end etc.

    If were going to microanalyze possessions like this, were still a long ways away from properly weighing the importance of each player's contribution to the successful possession.
    The value of elite scoring ability, by Phil Jackson:

    "This is a guy, we recognize his talent, and his skill is the kind of skill and talent that gets you through playoff games where things get sticky, grind-out, and basketball becomes a force game and suddenly you need to have a player who has the capabilities of scoring with someone hanging on them in a situation thatís critical. Heís one of those players, one of the few players who can do that.Ē

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    2,972
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by D-Leethal View Post
    I'm all for teams hiring analytical departments for stuff like this. You have the resources and should have as much information as you can as a half a billion dollar business. As a fan, its incredibly underwhelming to me. I appreciate the ambiguities of the game, I don't want to try and eliminate them.

    What I got most out of this, is that even when you break down a possession statistically you are still going to leave out key parts of the play statistically and you are still not properly weighing each part of the play statistically. The Duncan screen was arguably the most important part of the play and Duncan gets zilch, Parkers penetration and collapsing of the defense only gets him an assist in the end etc.

    If were going to microanalyze possessions like this, were still a long ways away from properly weighing the importance of each player's contribution to the successful possession.
    I think the article acknowledged as much, noting that they're understaffed, undertrained, and that most of this is still in its infancy.

    I don't think of being able to analyze each moment of the game as taking away the ambiguities, I think those still exist since this model looks at probabilities. I mean they broke down the play in the article, and yet here we are still debating the merits of the play.

    It just makes for a smarter conversation, more like a discussion like how a poker hand was played, and whether these guys increased probabilities or set up the other team throughout the course of the game, and which plays those were, etc.

    To oversimplify it, this is like going from the 8-color crayon box, and working your way up through the 32, the 64, and higher detail color schemes. The discussion gets opened up more, but at the same time is controlled and more productive because you now have less-disputable tools/currency in your debate.
    Jerry West or Larry Bird? The discussion is over.
    http://www.basketball-reference.com/.../birdje01.html

    Part of the GOAT team: Chamberlain, Bird, Duncan, Durrant, Ewing, Gervin.
    http://bkref.com/tiny/JIHaF

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    LI-NY
    Posts
    23,382
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Rentzias View Post
    I think the article acknowledged as much, noting that they're understaffed, undertrained, and that most of this is still in its infancy.

    I don't think of being able to analyze each moment of the game as taking away the ambiguities, I think those still exist since this model looks at probabilities. I mean they broke down the play in the article, and yet here we are still debating the merits of the play.

    It just makes for a smarter conversation, more like a discussion like how a poker hand was played, and whether these guys increased probabilities or set up the other team throughout the course of the game, and which plays those were, etc.

    To oversimplify it, this is like going from the 8-color crayon box, and working your way up through the 32, the 64, and higher detail color schemes. The discussion gets opened up more, but at the same time is controlled and more productive because you now have less-disputable tools/currency in your debate.
    "Quantify" or "Explain" was probably a better word than eliminate. I just think its an exercise in futility and impossible to explain the ambiguities of the game. For example, what happens if Parker's pass to Kawai Leonard was off and not directly on the numbers? What is Kawai has to lean down, disrupt his rhythm to catch before shooting the ball? I would imagine that has a major impact on whether or not he hits the shot and thus, whether or not it was the right play to make.

    If Parker takes it all the way, what if he is forced to make an extra dribble that disrupts his timing and rhythm? Most attacking players have a certain rhythm once they turn the corner and beat their defender, a certain number or strides and dribbles, what if he is thrown off base, forced to spin, studder or crossover? How do you quantify that? It surely can't be the same expected result as a perfect rhythm stride to the hoop can it?
    Last edited by D-Leethal; 02-07-2014 at 12:20 PM.
    The value of elite scoring ability, by Phil Jackson:

    "This is a guy, we recognize his talent, and his skill is the kind of skill and talent that gets you through playoff games where things get sticky, grind-out, and basketball becomes a force game and suddenly you need to have a player who has the capabilities of scoring with someone hanging on them in a situation thatís critical. Heís one of those players, one of the few players who can do that.Ē

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    LI-NY
    Posts
    23,382
    vCash
    1500
    I don't think all jump shots are equal even in the same area of the court with the same level of defense on you. All shots at the rim aren't equal. But these stats assume they are. Those are examples of the ambiguities I was referring to for the most part. How do you quantify that? Is it even worth microanalyzing it THAT deep?

    Some guys like the passes low, some like the passes high, some guys like to catch the ball at their right shoulder, some like it at their left shoulder, guys are going to respond differently to the passes they prefer and the different pass should have a different expected outcome.

    I guess we will need to wait and see what the 64 crayon case looks like before knowing if we will ever get that far.
    Last edited by D-Leethal; 02-07-2014 at 12:23 PM.
    The value of elite scoring ability, by Phil Jackson:

    "This is a guy, we recognize his talent, and his skill is the kind of skill and talent that gets you through playoff games where things get sticky, grind-out, and basketball becomes a force game and suddenly you need to have a player who has the capabilities of scoring with someone hanging on them in a situation thatís critical. Heís one of those players, one of the few players who can do that.Ē

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    31,658
    vCash
    1500
    Depends on the players. That pass is to Leonard and Kwhahi is stroking it at 36% from that spot. You trust that decision by Tony b/c it's a team designed play.

    But if it's Patty Mills and the recipient is say Nando, um..take the lay up.
    when they forget what Kevin Long saids

    I follow rules and appreciate the ignore button

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    25,152
    vCash
    54192
    I think this is a fantastic debate. One thing that I think has to be taken into consideration is that the Spurs are playing the Cavs. If you extend the game into overtime, there's 5 more minutes to be played. Who would pick in a 5 minute game is what it comes down to. I would lean towards Parker taking the layup, because with the game tied at let's say 8 seconds i'm confident that the Spurs won't let the Cavs score, sending the game into overtime where I trust the Spurs far more than Cleveland.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    LI-NY
    Posts
    23,382
    vCash
    1500
    To actually get on topic, I don't think you should ever give up guaranteed tie game for a chance at the win. You take the guarantee (or as close to a guarantee as you can get barring a missed layup). I think the OT point made above is a good one and say, your best player is fouled out, momentum has been against you all quarter, etc., sometimes you just know your not going to win in OT. Thats more of a gut feeling than anything and sometimes you need to try and hit the dagger and avoid tie game/OT.

    I surf, and my dad always told me "you don't leave great waves to go search for better waves because you might not surf any waves at all". You don't give up a great outcome for a chance at a better outcome 99% of the time in my book because you might strike out completely in search of that better outcome.
    The value of elite scoring ability, by Phil Jackson:

    "This is a guy, we recognize his talent, and his skill is the kind of skill and talent that gets you through playoff games where things get sticky, grind-out, and basketball becomes a force game and suddenly you need to have a player who has the capabilities of scoring with someone hanging on them in a situation thatís critical. Heís one of those players, one of the few players who can do that.Ē

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    20,619
    vCash
    1000
    We are early in the voting but I am surprised people would rather take a lower percentage shot than drive for the layup.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    San Antonio
    Posts
    22,593
    vCash
    1500
    On a play like that, you take the easiest shot available. If Waiters doesn't come down, Tony easily takes that layup. However Waiters did come down, and Tony felt the easier play would be to an open Kawhi for an open 3. Pretty simple IMO. I think that's an instinct play. Why force up something tougher, when you can get someone else an easier shot on a designed play.


    Quote Originally Posted by Iodine View Post
    Josh is like sex, but better
    Follow me on Twitter! @ josh_the_truth

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Brooklyn, NYC
    Posts
    11,852
    vCash
    1623
    The Spurs are a little different than other teams. Pop simply hates going into overtime. All it does is force guys to play longer when he wants to play them as little as possible as it is. So in the regular season, Pop is willing to take risks. Plus, it's a confidence builder for Kawhi. Not to mention when you look @ what he was shooting from the corner from around that time of the year, it was pretty impressive.



    He trusts TP to make the right call. If Leonard misses, I'm sure Pop is happy the play was executed properly and they got the shot they wanted.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •