Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    23,127
    vCash
    1500

    Draft Order Thread

    Top 20:
    1. Houston Texans - 2-14 (.559)
    2. St. Louis Rams (via Washington Redskins) - 3-13 (.516)
    3. Jacksonville Jaguars - 4-12 (.504)
    4. Cleveland Browns - 4-12 (.516)
    5. Oakland Raiders - 4-12 (.523)
    6. Atlanta Falcons - 4-12 (.553)
    7. Tampa Bay Buccaneers - 4-12 (.574)
    8. Minnesota Vikings - 5-10-1 (.512)
    9. Buffalo Bills - 6-10 (.520)
    10. Detroit Lions - 7-9 (.457)
    11. Tennessee Titans - 7-9 (.504)
    12. New York Giants - 7-9 (.520)
    13. St. Louis Rams - 7-9 (.551)
    14. Chicago Bears - 8-8 (.465)
    15. Pittsburgh Steelers - 8-8 (.469)
    16 or 17. Baltimore Ravens - 8-8 (.484)
    16 or 17. Dallas Cowboys - 8-8 (.484)
    18. New York Jets - 8-8 (.488)
    19. Miami Dolphins - 8-8 (.523)
    20. Arizona Cardinals - 10-5 (.529)
    21. Green Bay Packers
    22. Philadelphia Eagles
    23. Kansas City Chiefs
    24. Cincinnati Bengals
    Arizona locked in at 20, and Philly will get 19 if they lose tonight. Have to think Bridgewater and Matthews are locked in at one and two as of right now.
    Last edited by B'sCeltsPatsSox; 01-05-2014 at 09:34 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    10,768
    vCash
    1500
    Barr or bortles here we come if that's how the draft starts

    The Future Jacksonville Jaguars Power Couple

    #InCaldwellWeDon'tTrust

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    The U
    Posts
    15,051
    vCash
    3500
    Quote Originally Posted by B'sCeltsPatsSox View Post
    Top 15 as of right now:



    Arizona locked in at 20, and Philly will get 19 if they lose tonight. Have to think Bridgewater and Matthews are locked in at one and two as of right now.
    Wouldn't be shocked to see STL trade down again


    KoB Owns My Soul For Life

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Bratislava
    Posts
    79,546
    vCash
    1500
    lol RGIII trade. Man
    When I asked how a Manziel fan could bash Bridgewater's size.


    Quote Originally Posted by flgatorsandjags View Post
    Manziel is shorter than Teddy but he has size 15 feet
    Yeah...it's that bad.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    23,127
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Baller View Post
    Wouldn't be shocked to see STL trade down again
    I doubt it seeing that they already have a bar set on what the absolute minimum would have to be for them to get back picks wise in a trade, and after the way it worked out for Washington no team is going to want to do that now. You also have to consider that after Bridgewater, there really isn't a QB in this draft as of right now that is viewed as good as a prospect as RGIII was when he came out.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Bratislava
    Posts
    79,546
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by B'sCeltsPatsSox View Post
    I doubt it seeing that they already have a bar set on what the absolute minimum would have to be for them to get back picks wise in a trade, and after the way it worked out for Washington no team is going to want to do that now. You also have to consider that after Bridgewater, there really isn't a QB in this draft as of right now that is viewed as good as a prospect as RGIII was when he came out.
    Don't sleep on someone falling for Bortles
    When I asked how a Manziel fan could bash Bridgewater's size.


    Quote Originally Posted by flgatorsandjags View Post
    Manziel is shorter than Teddy but he has size 15 feet
    Yeah...it's that bad.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    23,127
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by NormSizedMidget View Post
    Don't sleep on someone falling for Bortles
    I wouldn't be surprised if he moves up if he has a great Fiesta Bowl, which is likely, but I just don't see him getting the hype RGIII did around the league when he was entering the draft. And like I said in my last post, do you think the Rams would budge for anything less than what they got a couple years ago for the second pick? Because I don't see any team making that type of offer to get Bortles.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Bratislava
    Posts
    79,546
    vCash
    1500
    No I'm with you. You're probably right they wouldn't take much less

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    8,484
    vCash
    1500
    Something on defense please.


    But if it comes down to next year, Ill be picketing outside of Halas Hall for a new deal, a new contract, because Im not going anyplace.

    -Brandon Marshall


    Chicago Bears Mock Offseason Champion

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    12,831
    vCash
    1500
    As a Rams fan I still say they trade the #2 regardless of whether they can get as much as they did in the RGIII deal. Matthews is more than likely their target and they can probably trade back a few spots and still get him. Not to mention that there may be a bidding war for Clowney amongst teams needing a pass rusher

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    23,127
    vCash
    1500
    Updated

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    5,495
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by GeorgiaBear View Post
    Something on defense please.
    GeorgiaBear.. You may NOT have Linval Joseph..

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •