Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





View Poll Results: Is Goodell a racist?

Voters
34. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    6 17.65%
  • No

    28 82.35%
Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 90
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Valley of the Sun
    Posts
    11,047
    vCash
    1500

    Is Goodell a racist?

    When NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell was asked about the Redskins’ name during this year’s pre-Super Bowl press conference, his off-the-cuff response was, “I don’t think anybody wants to offend anybody.” With the benefit of time to reflect on a written reply to a recent letter from 10 members of Congress, Goodell was more articulate and detailed. And also surprisingly candid.

    Goodell’s letter, a copy of which can be seen here, begins with an explanation of the origins of the label.

    “As you may know,” Goodell writes, “the team began as the Boston Braves in 1932, a name that honored the courage and heritage of Native Americans. The following year, the name was changed to the Redskins — in part to avoid confusion with the Boston baseball team of the same name, but also to honor the team’s then-head coach, William ‘Lone Star’ Dietz. Neither in intent nor use was the name ever meant to denigrate Native Americans or offend any group.”

    Goodell then argues that, because the name began with positive intentions, its meaning is “distinct from any disparagement that could be viewed in some other context.” And so, he explains, “For the team’s millions of fans and customers, who represent one of America’s most ethnically and geographically diverse fan bases, the name is a unifying force that stands for strength, courage, pride and respect.”

    Still, Goodell concedes that the “issues raised with respect to the Washington Redskins name are complex,” and he points out that the NFL “respect[s] that reasonable people may view it differently, particularly over time.”

    In our view, it’s a delicate way of acknowledging that, at some point in time, the superficially negative connotations of the term “Redskins” will outweigh the positive (or at least non-negative) intentions. A lot of things that were acceptable in 1932 are no longer deemed appropriate, regardless of original or current intent. At some point in the future, the reasonable minds that see the term as unacceptable likely will outweigh those that don’t.

    The fact that the letter wasn’t publicized by the NFL when sent to Congress on June 5 reflects, in our view, a subtle understanding that there’s no good way out of this corn maze. (Or, in this specific context, maize maze.)

    The reaction from at least one member of Congress has been loud and pointed. Eni Faleomavaega (D-American Samoa) took to the floor of the House of Representatives on Tuesday to complain about Goodell’s response.

    “Whether good intentioned or not, the ‘R’ word is a racial slur akin to the ‘N’ word among African Americans, or the ‘W’ word among Latin Americans,” Faleomavaega said.

    “Goodell has completely missed the point,” Faleomaveaga added. “It is time for the NFL to stop making excuses for itself and fully embrace its so-called commitment to diversity.”

    Betty McCollum (D-Minn.) chided Goodell’s response as demonstrating “twisted logic,” and she called it a “statement of absurdity.”

    “Goodell’s letter is another attempt to justify a racial slur on behalf of [Redskins owner] Dan Snyder and other NFL owners who appear to be only concerned with earning ever larger profits, even if it means exploiting a racist stereotype of Native Americans,” McCollum said.

    “Would Roger Goodell and Dan Snyder actually travel to a Native American community and greet a group of tribal leaders by saying, ‘Hey, what’s up, Redskin?’ I think not. . . . Indian children, families and elders are Americans, and just like all racial, ethnic or religious groups, they deserve to be treated with respect and dignity, not as a demeaning caricature or mascot. That shouldn’t be too much to ask of the NFL.”

    Of course, Goodell and Snyder also wouldn’t say, “What’s up, Chief?” or “What’s up, Seminole?” or “What’s up, Brave?” Still, those words — Chief, Seminole, Brave — when removed from the context of a team name and regarded in isolation aren’t objectively objectionable. Redskin, when stripped from the football team and regarded as simply a word, carries a distinct know-it-when-you-see-it label of racism.

    That’s the simple reality. Fans and defenders tie the name to the team and the team to the name and see nothing problematic about it. Or, for some fans and defenders, they realize that they need to outwardly claim there’s nothing problematic about it.

    Goodell’s letter acknowledges in know-it-when-you-see-it fashion that he knows the day will come when the NFL sees the name changed. It may not happen for 50 years or more, but eventually it will happen.

    And then, for the next 50 years or more, people who wanted to see the name remain the same will complain that it shouldn’t have changed.

    So, basically, get used to this controversy. It’s officially one of the subplots of America’s ultimate reality show, and it could be lingering for longer than the NFL already has existed.
    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...d-are-complex/

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Left
    Posts
    12,283
    vCash
    1500
    .....no

    “For the team’s millions of fans and customers
    lol

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    H-Town/The Burgh
    Posts
    13,065
    vCash
    1500
    No, just a terrible commish.

    Big THX to MJ's Bulls and pheagles10 on the sig help!
    Dear T-Mac,
    I miss you.
    Love,
    The Rim

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    5,872
    vCash
    1500
    No, but I expect the OP is a racist.
    Bill Parcells: "You are what your record says you are."

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Left
    Posts
    12,283
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by subroc View Post
    No, but I expect the OP is a racist.
    expect or suspect?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Valley of the Sun
    Posts
    11,047
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by subroc View Post
    No, but I expect the OP is a racist.
    No, I'm not. I just wanted to see how everyone feels about it.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    2,762
    vCash
    1500
    NFL timeline:

    pre-season - regular season - post season - pro bowl - super bowl - offseason - OMG IS "REDSKINS" RACIST SHOULD WE CHANGE THE NAME???? - the name never changes - pre-season... repeat until the end of time.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    6,400
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by subroc View Post
    No, but I expect the OP is a racist.
    +1
    Done - thank goodness

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Valley of the Sun
    Posts
    11,047
    vCash
    1500
    If the children don't feel the need to vote, then don't. Please don't try to bait the OP.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    7
    vCash
    1500
    My uncle (through marriage) is a full blooded native american whose reservation is based in Virginia, and he's a die hard redskins fan. I think its high time the political correct police get the hell over themselves. Once the ball starts rolling we will have to change the name of any team with any historical significance whatsoever...Historical franchises shouldn't have to rename their team every time a group of people decides that a term is no longer acceptable. You don't need a logical reason to root against a team, but being offended by their name should just be a reason to root against them. When did everyone get so damn Bi t c hy?
    Last edited by TipsyCrow; 06-12-2013 at 04:19 PM.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    5,872
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by DESERTDWELLER View Post
    If the children don't feel the need to vote, then don't. Please don't try to bait the OP.
    Attempting to accuse others of racism or being a racist indicates you have guilt over being a racist yourself. Admitting it will be the first step toward healing.
    Bill Parcells: "You are what your record says you are."

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Boise State
    Posts
    3,813
    vCash
    1500
    It is really amazing how many politically minded people who are not impacted by something feel the need to regulate these hot topic issues. Whites trying to define how native americans feel, men trying to regulate women's reproductive systems, straights trying to outlaw or legalize terms used by gays or lesbians being a family... The list goes on.

    The article writer takes great offense and sets up some really great straw men to get knocked down. If Betty McCollum (D-Minn.) can speak for her American Indian heritage and get a resounding backing indicating that "the AI nation is offended" then more power to her. My world perspective thinks this is a non-issue.
    Internet gamblers warning: Do NOT use Sports Interaction. They will steal your bankroll with hidden "administration fees" if you don't lose your money to them while betting.




  13. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,491
    vCash
    1500
    Yes. Durs. He named the redskins himself. Not only that, he only has white people playing in the nfl. Freaking racist pig. He needs to diversify.
    Pitches Thrown: 239 Strikes: 145
    15.1 INN 9 K 4 BB
    1 W 1 L 0.59ERA
    Joe "The Bunter" Kelly

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Preparing for WAR! 5/3/14 Maidana vs Mayweather
    Posts
    27,552
    vCash
    13463
    lol, please' top 10 p4p- Mayweather/Ward/Marquez/Pacquiao/Maidana/Rigondeaux/Froch/Cotto/B-Hop/Canelo
    Boxing fan? Come discuss Boxing!

    "We are chasing greatness" Mark Jackson 3/7/14

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Valley of the Sun
    Posts
    11,047
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by subroc View Post
    Attempting to accuse others of racism or being a racist indicates you have guilt over being a racist yourself. Admitting it will be the first step toward healing.
    And you accused me of being racist.

    Pot meet kettle.

Page 1 of 6 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •