Page 1 of 12 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 173
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    53,354

    Boozer for barngani? teams had talks...

    stein
    Just going online: ESPN sources say Bulls & Raptors have had exploratory talks on potential trade featuring Carlos Boozer & Andrea Bargnani

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Jersey
    Posts
    10,786

    Boozer for Bargnani discussed

    Marc Stein ‏@ESPNSteinLine
    Just going online: ESPN sources say Bulls & Raptors have had exploratory talks on potential trade featuring Carlos Boozer & Andrea Bargnani
    Marc Stein ‏@ESPNSteinLine
    ESPN link to Carlos Boozer/Andrea Bargnani exploratory trade discussions: http://es.pn/UGNCG0
    wow


    Quote Originally Posted by CousinsEvansDUO View Post
    Not going to read your posts or respond to them because judging by your sig you are a clueless nutjob. That girl is a 7/10 and you probably think shes a 10. Which means IRL you must be a 5/10 and sorry no offense bro but I don't talk to 5/10s or below, and by bro I mean never my bro.
    CousinsEvansDUO doesn't think i'm hot..

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Jersey
    Posts
    10,786
    i posted the link


    Quote Originally Posted by CousinsEvansDUO View Post
    Not going to read your posts or respond to them because judging by your sig you are a clueless nutjob. That girl is a 7/10 and you probably think shes a 10. Which means IRL you must be a 5/10 and sorry no offense bro but I don't talk to 5/10s or below, and by bro I mean never my bro.
    CousinsEvansDUO doesn't think i'm hot..

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    53,354
    Quote Originally Posted by knicks=love View Post
    i posted the link
    you get the assist

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    56,644
    They both kinda suck...

    But Bargs sucks WAY more. Don't get it from Chicago's perspective. Maybe additional pieces.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    53,354
    Quote Originally Posted by ManRamForPrez24 View Post
    They both kinda suck...

    But Bargs sucks WAY more. Don't get it from Chicago's perspective. Maybe additional pieces.
    chicago owner being cheap imo

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    14,569
    I don't get it for either team.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Jersey
    Posts
    10,786
    Quote Originally Posted by Gators123 View Post
    I don't get it for either team.
    this


    Quote Originally Posted by CousinsEvansDUO View Post
    Not going to read your posts or respond to them because judging by your sig you are a clueless nutjob. That girl is a 7/10 and you probably think shes a 10. Which means IRL you must be a 5/10 and sorry no offense bro but I don't talk to 5/10s or below, and by bro I mean never my bro.
    CousinsEvansDUO doesn't think i'm hot..

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Manchester, CT
    Posts
    2,249
    I'm not sure Barfnani could play with that team defensively, let alone start. Bad idea for the Bulls IMO.
    Quote Originally Posted by bagwell368 View Post
    If Sullinger ever finishes an NBA season in the top 75 in Win Shares, I'll quit the forum.
    ^^ Deal taken! ^^

    Folks, come join us in the Celtics forum where "educated" posters say things like:
    Quote Originally Posted by bagwell368 View Post
    Rondo... can't be the #1, #2, or #3 option on a serious contender.
    ......

    Quote Originally Posted by Superdude View Post
    ANYONE who wants to claim our offense is better without Rondo you're ****ing braindead.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    6,763
    i hate bargnani but no THAT much

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    7,884
    Boozer has been amazing this year.

    What are y'all talking about? He has had one bad year in his career (last season) and it wasn't even as bad as people think
    Last edited by LTBaByyy; 02-07-2013 at 06:07 PM.
    FOLLOW ME
    MAVS TWITTER: @MAVSFANSFORLIFE 300 followers
    PERSONAL TWITTER: @LTDaShocka 4,000 followers

    "Do The LT Dance" will come back out of retirement when the Mavs are good again *Big Offseason*

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    9,059
    I think Tom Thibbs would just quit if they made that trade.

    Wins needed countdown: 2

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Manchester, CT
    Posts
    2,249
    Quote Originally Posted by Gators123 View Post
    I don't get it for either team.
    It makes sense for the Raptors, who essentially just went "all in" with the rudy gay trade. The Raptors are officially in a "win now" mode since they have solid pieces at nearly every position.

    The one thing the Raptors yet lack though is a low post presnence who can rebound. That's exactly what Boozer brings to the table.
    Quote Originally Posted by bagwell368 View Post
    If Sullinger ever finishes an NBA season in the top 75 in Win Shares, I'll quit the forum.
    ^^ Deal taken! ^^

    Folks, come join us in the Celtics forum where "educated" posters say things like:
    Quote Originally Posted by bagwell368 View Post
    Rondo... can't be the #1, #2, or #3 option on a serious contender.
    ......

    Quote Originally Posted by Superdude View Post
    ANYONE who wants to claim our offense is better without Rondo you're ****ing braindead.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    7,884
    Raptors will be a 5-8 seed next season guaranteed
    FOLLOW ME
    MAVS TWITTER: @MAVSFANSFORLIFE 300 followers
    PERSONAL TWITTER: @LTDaShocka 4,000 followers

    "Do The LT Dance" will come back out of retirement when the Mavs are good again *Big Offseason*

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    56,644
    Yeah...Boozer certainly doesn't "suck". I got a bit carried away, but I still have never been too enamored with his decision making, defense or efficiency.

    But Bargs is BAD. I don't get it for Chicago. Makes sense for Toronto though...unless they'd have to give up something valuable too...because Bargs is not valuable.

Page 1 of 12 12311 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •