As for closing the chapter on Bargnani, I'm not against it but IMO it wouldn't hurt to see his fit with Gay on roster even if to only build value before doing so. I remain Bargnani gives this big man depth versatility, doesn't mean he has to start.
As for closing the chapter on Bargnani, I'm not against it but IMO it wouldn't hurt to see his fit with Gay on roster even if to only build value before doing so. I remain Bargnani gives this big man depth versatility, doesn't mean he has to start.
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
This is why you don't rush rebuilds. You end up with platoons instead of rock solid talent. I see your point about how to deploy WHAT WE'VE GOT and it's nicely laid out but it is a patchwork approach rather than working with the kind of dominant talent you can get if you draft slowly and carefully.
On bad nights I can see the Raptors jacking up a lot of shots. Not every team is going to give us fast break after fast break every night.
I have a very strong feeling we are going to see Bargnani in a Raptors uniform for a while, and largely BECAUSE of the trade assets we expended in the Gay trade. Plus I can already sense that BC is hedging back to not giving up on his big project.
Last edited by ink; 02-02-2013 at 09:33 AM.
I don't consider trading for a 26yo about to enter his prime rushing a rebuild. What I find ironic is the people saying this, want a 30yo Gasol.
Bargnani -27
Gay -26
Lowry -26
Amir -25
DeRozan -23
Acy -22
Ross -21
Jonas 20
Don't know how you can consider trading a 30yo expiring PG & a 24yo PF for a 26yo SF who better balances the teams talent, rushing a rebuild.
AA is expiring, Klieza has a year left & if this team trades out Bargnani or amnesties him the oldest player on roster would be lucas at (30) followed by Gay (26).
With several young assets they could use in trade. Seeing you refer to Calderon & Ed as our 2 biggest assets has me confused. I would think our 2 biggest trade assets are Jonas & Ross.
Last edited by B2B; 02-02-2013 at 10:25 AM.
you are starting to sound a lot like me but there is something that irks me about that. usually when people have said "BC will never trade Bargnani!" you have been quick to point out comments in the media, rumours and the like and say that obviously he is going to, obviously his feelings have changed. so why at a time when BC continues to make those sorts of comments (like the ones from the other night) have you decided all of a sudden to join the other side of the argument? what has changed for you?
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
I don't want him to play any minutes. I'll rather go small and develop Ross than to sacrifice time for Andrea. I know we'll have to play him to showcase him for trades and what not but with the addition of Rudy Gay and with the emergence of AA and DD as reliable offensive options, what niche Andrea has (can) carved out for himself is easily replaceable.
Last edited by Freakazoid; 02-02-2013 at 11:58 AM.
It's not just the age, it's the process that has been aborted. You can never get as good talent as economically as through the draft. That ship has sailed though. And btw, I have been against Gasol for a while, but now that the rebuild is scuttled I could see his veteran presence being very useful at C. Kind of a super-Rasho.
Last edited by ink; 02-02-2013 at 12:30 PM.
Because I think he will be tempted to see his big project in action with Gay. And I think there has been an element of motivation involved in what he's been doing and saying lately. If Bargnani has an ounce of competitive spark he will have A LOT TO PROVE when he gets back. I don't think for a second that BC hasn't been doing that willfully, poking him harder and harder with talk of trades, and the need to produce.
I mean everyone is talking about Bargnani as if he's a complete loser and doesn't have any skills except shooting when obviously that is incorrect. Time for him to prove it. This is the moment when he either does and BC gets what he really wanted -- to have his #1 come through finally -- or it's the moment where he gets moved.