It would be a PROBLEM if big men have more assists than a SG.
It would be a PROBLEM if big men have more assists than a SG.
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
Kobe was never better than Shaq during their stay together. I wouldn't say Kobe passed Shaq until his 2nd year in Miami.
And it seems kind of odd to become a Kobe fan during that time when you consider how pathetic he looked in the Finals and how dominant Shaq was (Although he wasn't perfect and clearly declining). Your a true Kobe fan if you kept with him during that time with Phils tell all book basically blasting him.
Last edited by Chronz; 02-01-2013 at 11:48 AM.
So you have no proof? Typical.
Now you understand why I act the way I do on here sometimes.
MJ is a ballhog, but Kobe's a bigger ballhog.
Because a known Kobephile posted this in other to slob on Kobe's knob some more.
Not sure why people don't get this.
His 81 was impressive, I just think his 62 in 3 quarters was more impressive.
How did "I" turn it into a negative? :confushed:
Because that obviously detracted from his argument.![]()
How exactly are you remembering those moments because I fail to see how Kobe missing the playoffs and posting horrendous numbers by superstar standards and Shaq playing like an MVP and turning the Heat around, means Kobe was the better player. Shaq took a backseat the following year.
But I find it hypocritical that you want people to remember what Kobe did prior to the Finals yet completely disregard Shaq's domination of Detroit to get Miami there. Kobe was likely better at that point IMO but they are similar situations
Kobe wasn't surrounded by 3 point shooters? Did he not play with Robert Horry, Rick Fox, Fisher and even Devon George who had a few good years. If you can't remember them then you don't remember Kobe with those lakers. You are bringing up players from a crappy team.
Last edited by Slug3; 02-01-2013 at 11:55 AM.
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
Dont listen to them. The triangle is the Kobe system. The year Phil and Shaq left, the Lakers ran a basic spread offense with Kobe being the primary playmaker. He would have led the league in turnovers if not for replacement coach Hambell returning to the triangle mid-season. His passing the rest of the year was more precise and the rest of his efficiency returned.
So when you see people mention the triangle, tell them it doesn't excuse his lack of passing efficiency in comparison to whoever they are comparing (no doubt LeBron, Wade and back in the day it was Tmac)
So yea, if Kobe didn't play in the triangle he could have averaged more assists, but his passing efficiency would be putrid. Kobe was at his best back then when he could attack from the wing without worrying about expending energy getting his team into sets and creating for everyone. I always thought it was because he has iffy hands and much of his playmaking is centered around his threat as a scorer.
Last edited by Chronz; 02-01-2013 at 12:04 PM.
when you have the ball that much, you sometimes have to pass. playing with a big like Shaq helps a lot of those assists come faster. Jordan didn't play with a big like that. he is also the all time leader in assists for the bulls, call me when Kobe breaks the Lakers record. the other 3 guys were bigs with talent around them. Malone and Stockton passed willingly btw each other.
What is the accomplishment we're talking about? Having more career assists than some great big men scorers? Having more career assists than Jordan?
That's hardly an accomplishment worth bragging about.
I'm not trying to bash Kobe here...it's just we're talking about some "great accomplishment" that, well, really means nothing.
| Sponsored Links |
|
|