
Originally Posted by
Korac
Unless something new comes to light, the period covered in the documentation is the period he was already suspended for, so he should be clear on that front. It looks bad, but again, we knew what we were getting when we signed him, so we have to take the bad with the good.
In the extremely unlikely event he was suspended again because of new information, I would think who replaced him would depend when in the season it happened, and where we are in the standings at the point. Should be a moot point tho.