The "liberal cause" was one company.
The "conservative cause" is listening probably hundreds of companies, organizations, sports teams, actors, authors, producers, musicians, etc., etc., etc. The sheer volume and variety of people/groups/etc on that list is what makes it so insane. The fact that the NRA wants to boycott people is a surprise to no one. The fact that they want to boycott everyone but my third grade teacher is, I would think you would be smart enough to see, at least a little crazy.
On the other hand, we have the NRA, one of the most insidious, dangerous, ultra conservative, and downright crazy institutions anywhere on the planet, one that can only exist in the US because it would not be tolerated anywhere else. It's hardly as simple or clear cut as a liberal issue vs a conservative one.
There is nothing to compare the NRA to - anywhere.
Usually when a group liberal or conservative is calling for a boycott they are pretty specific; don't buy their product, don't watch/listen to their show, ect. I would think when you are the National Rifle Association you may not want to leave this open for interpretation. But I question how much the NRA really cares when there is a shooting, it seems to increase business for the gun industry.
The NRA should have every right to do this, but I think we should question the mental facuties of a group that opposes groups like:
American Medical Association
Children`s Defense Fund
National Coalition Against Domestic Violence
I'm surprised not to see the Southern Poverty Law Center on this list.
I hope that Rachel Maddow isn't suicidal at having been left off this list. I can't imagine what else she'd have to do to earn inclusion.
What about the craziness of having all three main networks plus PBS on the list? Or the nation's major and most respected newspapers, as well as Time-Warner? Doesn't this insanity tell us something about the NRA that people really should pay attention to?
Ha who just brings up Rachel Maddow mid conversation..
This is pretty hilarious. Best of luck fighting those evil bastards at the Int`l Ladies` Garment Workers` Union.......godspeed NRA you courageous freedom fighters.
Here is the question of the day, does anyone think that wealthy people should pay a lower percentage of their income to taxes than middle class people? Don't argue tax brackets, just a simple question. Do you think someone earning 46 million dollars should pay a lower percentage of their income than say someone earning sixty thousand?
Ha that sig can not be true.
I think you need to give the NRA some credit. If it wasn't for the NRA, Marla Maples would be completely forgotten.