Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25

Thread: Bulls Dynasty

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    66
    vCash
    1500

    Bulls Dynasty

    Sometimes teams never get over the hurdle of beating a team in the playoffs,like Kings vs Lakers in the 2000s' Knicks vs Bulls in the 90's(with Jordan) Cavs vs Bulls' just to name a few,would the Bulls dynasty have been halted if they did not beat the "Bad Boy Pistons" in 91',what yaw think?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    46,046
    vCash
    1500
    Why would that have prevented them from winning the other five times?

    And then. He made them pancakes.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    2,678
    vCash
    1500
    I think the word "dynasty" gets thrown around too freely.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    66
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Doogolas View Post
    Why would that have prevented them from winning the other five times?
    Oh I'm quite sure they would have prob won,but I was wondering would they have gone forward with the same team or made changes if they lost to the Pistons again? Sorry I did not specify earlier.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    8,397
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Zo View Post
    I think the word "dynasty" gets thrown around too freely.
    Are you actually implying that the Bulls winning 6 titles in 8 years isn't considered a dynasty?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    20,432
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by DJHUFF2000 View Post
    Oh I'm quite sure they would have prob won,but I was wondering would they have gone forward with the same team or made changes if they lost to the Pistons again? Sorry I did not specify earlier.
    Probably nothing too drastic. The core of that team was extremely young still outside of Cartwright.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    33,696
    vCash
    2766
    Quote Originally Posted by Cubsfan365 View Post
    Are you actually implying that the Bulls winning 6 titles in 8 years isn't considered a dynasty?
    Not to mention, Jordan didn't lose in the finals a single time. He single handedly altered history by preventing hall of famers from ever winning a championship.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    2,678
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Cubsfan365 View Post
    Are you actually implying that the Bulls winning 6 titles in 8 years isn't considered a dynasty?
    The only true dynasties in the NBA are the Lakers and Celtics. They've been in/won championships in every decade since the 50's. The Bulls only have the 90's.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    7,932
    vCash
    4000
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Zo View Post
    The only true dynasties in the NBA are the Lakers and Celtics. They've been in/won championships in every decade since the 50's. The Bulls only have the 90's.
    Cool so just remember if the Heat win 5 of the next 7 titles, this Heat team won't be considered a dynasty because they didn't win anything in the 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    2,678
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Pierzynski4Prez View Post
    Cool so just remember if the Heat win 5 of the next 7 titles, this Heat team won't be considered a dynasty because they didn't win anything in the 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s.
    The Bulls were "Team of the decade" for sure. That's a great accomplishment that only a few teams can hold claim to. As far as the Heat goes: I don't care about how is or isn't calling them a dynasty years from now as long as they're winning now. If they can pull anything close to what the Bulls did, I'll be happy.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    935
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Zo View Post
    The Bulls were "Team of the decade" for sure. That's a great accomplishment that only a few teams can hold claim to. As far as the Heat goes: I don't care about how is or isn't calling them a dynasty years from now as long as they're winning now. If they can pull anything close to what the Bulls did, I'll be happy.
    your definition of a dynasty is different then everyone elses

    i look at a dynasty as a set of years which were dominated by a certain team, the celtics and lakers have had multiple dynasties, kobe and shaqs in the 2000's, magic in the 80's, and west etc.
    the bulls had a dynasty in the 90's.
    its like if the thunder won 6 titles this decade, they would be considered a dynasty even though they have no history at all

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    PHX
    Posts
    4,104
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by D_Rose1118 View Post
    your definition of a dynasty is different then everyone elses

    i look at a dynasty as a set of years which were dominated by a certain team, the celtics and lakers have had multiple dynasties, kobe and shaqs in the 2000's, magic in the 80's, and west etc.
    the bulls had a dynasty in the 90's.
    its like if the thunder won 6 titles this decade, they would be considered a dynasty even though they have no history at all
    This. LOL what a dumbass

    Quote Originally Posted by Guppyfighter View Post


    The division is going to be ran by the Sixers and Raptors in three years. Book it.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    2,678
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by D_Rose1118 View Post
    your definition of a dynasty is different then everyone elses

    i look at a dynasty as a set of years which were dominated by a certain team, the celtics and lakers have had multiple dynasties, kobe and shaqs in the 2000's, magic in the 80's, and west etc.
    the bulls had a dynasty in the 90's.
    its like if the thunder won 6 titles this decade, they would be considered a dynasty even though they have no history at all
    It's a subjective term, I guess. To me it's teams that are great for multiple generations.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    2,678
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by KnickaBocka.44 View Post
    This. LOL what a dumbass
    Your Knicks won't be winning anything anytime soon, so don't worry about dynasties.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Lost (Please Send Help)
    Posts
    4,408
    vCash
    1500
    This. LOL what a dumbass
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Zo View Post
    Your Knicks won't be winning anything anytime soon, so don't worry about dynasties.
    oh snap, fight fight!

    Jimmy G.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •