Bulls Dynasty

[DJHUFF2000]

Sometimes teams never get over the hurdle of beating a team in the playoffs,like Kings vs Lakers in the 2000s' Knicks vs Bulls in the 90's(with Jordan) Cavs vs Bulls' just to name a few,would the Bulls dynasty have been halted if they did not beat the "Bad Boy Pistons" in 91',what yaw think?

[Doogolas]

Why would that have prevented them from winning the other five times?

[Big Zo]

I think the word "dynasty" gets thrown around too freely.

[DJHUFF2000]

Why would that have prevented them from winning the other five times?

Oh I'm quite sure they would have prob won,but I was wondering would they have gone forward with the same team or made changes if they lost to the Pistons again? Sorry I did not specify earlier.

[Cubsfan365]

I think the word "dynasty" gets thrown around too freely.

Are you actually implying that the Bulls winning 6 titles in 8 years isn't considered a dynasty?

[haggis]

Oh I'm quite sure they would have prob won,but I was wondering would they have gone forward with the same team or made changes if they lost to the Pistons again? Sorry I did not specify earlier.

Probably nothing too drastic. The core of that team was extremely young still outside of Cartwright.

[king4day]

Are you actually implying that the Bulls winning 6 titles in 8 years isn't considered a dynasty?

Not to mention, Jordan didn't lose in the finals a single time. He single handedly altered history by preventing hall of famers from ever winning a championship.

[Big Zo]

Are you actually implying that the Bulls winning 6 titles in 8 years isn't considered a dynasty?

The only true dynasties in the NBA are the Lakers and Celtics. They've been in/won championships in every decade since the 50's. The Bulls only have the 90's.

[Pierzynski4Prez]

The only true dynasties in the NBA are the Lakers and Celtics. They've been in/won championships in every decade since the 50's. The Bulls only have the 90's.

Cool so just remember if the Heat win 5 of the next 7 titles, this Heat team won't be considered a dynasty because they didn't win anything in the 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s.

[Big Zo]

Cool so just remember if the Heat win 5 of the next 7 titles, this Heat team won't be considered a dynasty because they didn't win anything in the 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s.

The Bulls were "Team of the decade" for sure. That's a great accomplishment that only a few teams can hold claim to. As far as the Heat goes: I don't care about how is or isn't calling them a dynasty years from now as long as they're winning now. If they can pull anything close to what the Bulls did, I'll be happy.

[D_Rose1118]

The Bulls were "Team of the decade" for sure. That's a great accomplishment that only a few teams can hold claim to. As far as the Heat goes: I don't care about how is or isn't calling them a dynasty years from now as long as they're winning now. If they can pull anything close to what the Bulls did, I'll be happy.

your definition of a dynasty is different then everyone elses

i look at a dynasty as a set of years which were dominated by a certain team, the celtics and lakers have had multiple dynasties, kobe and shaqs in the 2000's, magic in the 80's, and west etc.
the bulls had a dynasty in the 90's.
its like if the thunder won 6 titles this decade, they would be considered a dynasty even though they have no history at all

[KnickaBocka.44]

your definition of a dynasty is different then everyone elses

i look at a dynasty as a set of years which were dominated by a certain team, the celtics and lakers have had multiple dynasties, kobe and shaqs in the 2000's, magic in the 80's, and west etc.
the bulls had a dynasty in the 90's.
its like if the thunder won 6 titles this decade, they would be considered a dynasty even though they have no history at all

This. LOL what a dumbass

[Big Zo]

your definition of a dynasty is different then everyone elses

i look at a dynasty as a set of years which were dominated by a certain team, the celtics and lakers have had multiple dynasties, kobe and shaqs in the 2000's, magic in the 80's, and west etc.
the bulls had a dynasty in the 90's.
its like if the thunder won 6 titles this decade, they would be considered a dynasty even though they have no history at all

It's a subjective term, I guess. To me it's teams that are great for multiple generations.

[Big Zo]

This. LOL what a dumbass

Your Knicks won't be winning anything anytime soon, so don't worry about dynasties.

[DaBUU]

This. LOL what a dumbass

Your Knicks won't be winning anything anytime soon, so don't worry about dynasties.

oh snap, fight fight!