Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 118
  1. #46
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    10,400
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by fanofclendennon View Post
    Well if you do, you might want to play this song shortly after.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=26J0uDIGErM

    You know, I don't miss the 70s one single solitary bit.
    I got married in the 70s.

    At least I think I did.

  2. #47
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    24,927
    vCash
    1500
    For the guys saying there is no way in hell we reach 80 wins any time soon, I disagree.
    There is a ton of variance and unexpected results in baseball. Who knows a few guys come out of nowhere and have great seasons and we could be good. The chances aren't spectacular we will be good this year, but its a possibility.

    With a bunch of young talent under control for relatively little money I think there is reason to be (cautiously!) excited about our future. (Even if the last few years have been a mess)

  3. #48
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bergen County by way of Brooklyn
    Posts
    1,234
    vCash
    1500
    We limped to a 74 win season with Dickey but half a season without Santana and Gee...stuck with 24 starts from a bunch of retreads and AAAA pitchers who went 3-13 6.50. With any level of health the staff will be greatly improved. Our infield is solid and we will get much more offense from Buck and TDA later than we have had in years. The pen has no way to go but up...will our oldsters Feliciano and Byrdak contribute? Why wouldn't Duda go 25 80 .270? Nieuwenhuis and Cowgill should produce enough. But we do meed one more good bat to make enough offense and another vet in the pen would help. Overall I like the tone of the post. LGM.
    Bob
    Met fan since 1969

  4. #49
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bergen County by way of Brooklyn
    Posts
    1,234
    vCash
    1500
    Why can't our top three starters all go something like 14-11 and Marcum and Gee 12-9? Add in 3 wins from Wheeler and 3 more spot start wins from Mejia, Familia and Hefner and that's 72 wins. If the pen goes .500 the team wins 87 games and has a shot to make a July move to make a run at the wild card. If we get 25 80 .265 from Duda and 15 70 .270 25 SBs from the Nieieenhuis/Cowgill platoon and add one more solid outfielder (Bourn)? and a decent performance out of the new pen and why not contend this year?
    Bob
    Met fan since 1969

  5. #50
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    10,400
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by rdg515 View Post
    Why can't our top three starters all go something like 14-11 and Marcum and Gee 12-9? Add in 3 wins from Wheeler and 3 more spot start wins from Mejia, Familia and Hefner and that's 72 wins. If the pen goes .500 the team wins 87 games and has a shot to make a July move to make a run at the wild card. If we get 25 80 .265 from Duda and 15 70 .270 25 SBs from the Nieieenhuis/Cowgill platoon and add one more solid outfielder (Bourn)? and a decent performance out of the new pen and why not contend this year?
    Certainly sounds simple.

  6. #51
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Queens, NY
    Posts
    50,952
    vCash
    1500
    I don't know how anyone can predict something like RBI or wins and losses for pitchers. Those stats are out of the players control for the most part which is why those stats hold little to no weight these days.

  7. #52
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Brooklyn to Denver to L.A. to Denver and back to L.A.
    Posts
    16,017
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by jomota View Post
    Certainly sounds simple.
    Way too simple.

    Too many "ifs" give me the yips......
    [IMG][/IMG]


    Mets Dieharder Since '63
    Broncos Dieharder Since '73
    Los Angeles Kings Dieharder Since 1987
    Los Angeles Kings 2012 and 2014 Stanley Cup Champions -
    Denver Rockets/Nuggets Dieharder Since '73

    ua you're gone, but never forgotten, R.I.P.

  8. #53
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Bergen County by way of Brooklyn
    Posts
    1,234
    vCash
    1500
    "I don't know how anyone can predict something like RBI or wins and losses for pitchers. Those stats are out of the players control for the most part which is why those stats hold little to no weight these days."

    Its called 'projecting'. Marcum averages 13-9 3.70 over the last six years...it is reasonable to project a similar record in year 7 if healthy. Niese has emerged as a 13-16 game winner....Santana if healthy and Harvey if steady should produce similar results. And nowhere am I predicting a 20 win season from any of them---I figured Dickey was good for 15-16 wins last year....career years are the only thing folks should not try to 'predict'. Same thing for Wright and Davis...past performance suggests they will combine for 50 HR and 200 RBIs...Buck in 400 ABs has gone 16 60 .270 over the course of a few seasons [cannot fathom how he went from .280 to .196 suddenly---he is hard to 'project']. The goal should be 90+ wins any way they can get them but a team that scores 700+ runs with an ERA under 3.80 is usually a contender....and those stats are achievable if we add a Bourn and a Valverde type to this roster. Going from 74 wins to 88+ means you don't have 22 starts from fringy guys who go 3-13 6.50 and six bullpeners who combined to go 6-17 6.30 like they hd last year. 9-30 6.45 from a bunch that is mostly gone from the roster. Turn that into a .500 record of 20-19 3.85 and you're at 85 wins or better.
    Bob
    Met fan since 1969

  9. #54
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Queens, NY
    Posts
    50,952
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by rdg515 View Post
    "I don't know how anyone can predict something like RBI or wins and losses for pitchers. Those stats are out of the players control for the most part which is why those stats hold little to no weight these days."

    Its called 'projecting'. Marcum averages 13-9 3.70 over the last six years...it is reasonable to project a similar record in year 7 if healthy. Niese has emerged as a 13-16 game winner....Santana if healthy and Harvey if steady should produce similar results. And nowhere am I predicting a 20 win season from any of them---I figured Dickey was good for 15-16 wins last year....career years are the only thing folks should not try to 'predict'. Same thing for Wright and Davis...past performance suggests they will combine for 50 HR and 200 RBIs...Buck in 400 ABs has gone 16 60 .270 over the course of a few seasons [cannot fathom how he went from .280 to .196 suddenly---he is hard to 'project']. The goal should be 90+ wins any way they can get them but a team that scores 700+ runs with an ERA under 3.80 is usually a contender....and those stats are achievable if we add a Bourn and a Valverde type to this roster. Going from 74 wins to 88+ means you don't have 22 starts from fringy guys who go 3-13 6.50 and six bullpeners who combined to go 6-17 6.30 like they hd last year. 9-30 6.45 from a bunch that is mostly gone from the roster. Turn that into a .500 record of 20-19 3.85 and you're at 85 wins or better.
    ....

    Dickey won 8 games in 2011 with a 3.29 ERA I believe. Trying to project wins by pitchers is meaningless.

  10. #55
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Hill Valley, 1985.
    Posts
    7,792
    vCash
    1500
    Realistic expectations?

    Another wasted season which ends in July (if they start badly, June), and was really sunk before it even began, no attempt to even try and win or improve the team, leaves the Mets cheaper to run for the Coupons but no better on the field.

    Meanwhile Washington and Atlanta who did improve their teams, sail further off into the distance than before on their yachts, as Alderson's phony baloney rebuild creaks along like an old paddle steamer trailing in their wake, endlessly creating new excuses not to spend money. It's ok for Captain Spindy, in another couple of years he gets on the lifeboat and gets hauled aboard the SS MLB FRONT OFFICE, for a top job, his last mission, steering the Mets round and round around Manhatten until everyone gets dizzy - accomplished.

    That's my expectations of the charade we're currently watching.

  11. #56
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    24,199
    vCash
    1500
    I think we'll be around 75-80 wins. But I'm hoping for less than 70 so we can get a top pick next year. I don't think we are a legitimate contender this year so might as well rebuild

  12. #57
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Hill Valley, 1985.
    Posts
    7,792
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by rdg515 View Post
    Why can't our top three starters all go something like 14-11 and Marcum and Gee 12-9? Add in 3 wins from Wheeler and 3 more spot start wins from Mejia, Familia and Hefner and that's 72 wins. If the pen goes .500 the team wins 87 games and has a shot to make a July move to make a run at the wild card. If we get 25 80 .265 from Duda and 15 70 .270 25 SBs from the Nieieenhuis/Cowgill platoon and add one more solid outfielder (Bourn)? and a decent performance out of the new pen and why not contend this year?

    Are you seriously saying that adding up win by the SP's makes you a winner now?

    If there's a more meaningless stat in baseball than pitcher wins, I don't know it.

  13. #58
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    2,856
    vCash
    1500
    I think it's a 77-80 win team right now, 82-85 wins if they add Bourn.

  14. #59
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cool Ranch, NM
    Posts
    18,373
    vCash
    1500
    70 - 75 wins realistically.

    But who knows...anything can happen. Look at the A's and Orioles of last season.
    DUDA


    Quote Originally Posted by VendettaRed07 View Post
    noah is gonna be a beast man.

    with him and harvey, its like were gonna have Goku and Vegetta in the same rotation

  15. #60
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    661
    vCash
    1500
    i think between seventy to eighty games is reasonable.I do think we need to get some good outfielders out there but i just don't want the FO to sign people to bad contracts.If that means we wait a year to get an better outfielder i would be for it.

Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •