Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 80
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    29,343
    vCash
    1500
    Jim Callis ‏@jimcallisBA
    Rules say top 10 picks, period. @ramin808: Not wishful thinking, Mets had a top ten worst record there pick should be protected #mlbdraft

    Jim Callis ‏@jimcallisBA
    Rules are rules. Wishful thinking. @chrisbirckhead: any thoughts on #mets protest that their 11 pick should be protected? #mlbdraft


    "You don't know how to drink. Your whole generation, you drink for the wrong reasons. My generation, we drink because it's good, because it feels better than unbuttoning your collar, because we deserve it. We drink because it's what men do."

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    The Boogie Down Bronx!
    Posts
    8,144
    vCash
    935
    Heck at least they are showing some fight in the FA market....

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    22,223
    vCash
    1500
    http://www.cbssports.com/mlb/blog/ml...rst-round-pick

    The MLBPA would support the Mets if the club requests to have its first-round pick protected should it sign free agent Michael Bourn, Ken Rosenthal of Fox Sports reported Thursday.

    With the Braves extending Bourn a qualifying offer this season, any club wishing to sign him must give up their first-round pick unless the pick lands in the top 10. The Mets have the 11th pick in the draft but had the 10th-worst record in the majors.

    The Pirates' failure to sign eighth-overall pick Mark Appel -- the presumed No. 1 pick who slipped due to signability issues after the Astros selected Carlos Correa first -- in last year's draft resulted in Pittsburgh getting the eighth pick in this year's draft as compensation.

    Therefore, the Mets were pushed back from 10th to 11th and lost protection on the pick when signing a free agent who was extended the qualifying offer.

    The Mets' argument would be the spirit of the rule put in place with the new free-agent compensation system meant to protect the teams with the 10 worst records, not simply those who have the top 10 picks due to draft pick compensation from the previous year.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    6,922
    vCash
    1500
    Come on Selig and the MLBPA. Help us out!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Behind the 8 ball
    Posts
    12,256
    vCash
    1500
    Makes sense to me

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    22,223
    vCash
    1500
    Yeah the Mets have the spirit of the rule correct (even it's not technically) and backing from the MLBPA should put pressure on the commissioner's office.

    We'll see but i still think it's wishful thinking.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Asheville, NC
    Posts
    29,170
    vCash
    1500
    OMG let it happen.

    Bourn, Marcum, TDA, and Syndergaard in one off season is pretty good with me.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    22,223
    vCash
    1500
    Yep it would be great to keep that pick and the slot money associated with it.

    We really don't want to lose that amount of money in the draft which can be useful in later rounds if they sign a guy under slot.
    Last edited by metswon69; 01-24-2013 at 04:46 PM.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    The Boogie Down
    Posts
    79,757
    vCash
    1500
    I hope they get the green light and get the pick protected, is only right since that was the way it was in the old agreement.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    301
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Sick Of It All View Post
    I hope they get the green light and get the pick protected, is only right since that was the way it was in the old agreement.
    Considering what Selig has done for the Mets in the past, if Alderson really wants Bourne, I could see Selig cutting the Mets a break here.

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    29,343
    vCash
    1500
    MLBPA are the ones who may put up the biggest stink about the situation, there is a rumor that they might file a grievance against MLB.


    "You don't know how to drink. Your whole generation, you drink for the wrong reasons. My generation, we drink because it's good, because it feels better than unbuttoning your collar, because we deserve it. We drink because it's what men do."

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Brooklyn, New York
    Posts
    6,922
    vCash
    1500
    Why? Isn't it better for the players to draw more interest from teams?
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Hill Valley, 1985.
    Posts
    7,792
    vCash
    1500
    I think this is a long shot.

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    29,343
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by NY_Heartbreak View Post
    Why? Isn't it better for the players to draw more interest from teams?
    Because player's value are decreasing if a team loses draft money and a pick.


    "You don't know how to drink. Your whole generation, you drink for the wrong reasons. My generation, we drink because it's good, because it feels better than unbuttoning your collar, because we deserve it. We drink because it's what men do."

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    29,343
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Marty Mcfly View Post
    I think this is a long shot.
    I agree.


    "You don't know how to drink. Your whole generation, you drink for the wrong reasons. My generation, we drink because it's good, because it feels better than unbuttoning your collar, because we deserve it. We drink because it's what men do."

Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •