Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    The Alamo
    Posts
    2,675
    vCash
    1500

    Spurs summer plans will hinge on ginobili

    Written by Trevor Zickgraf


    When the San Antonio Spurs traded Richard Jefferson for Stephen Jackson, one of the benefits was Jackson's contract had one less year on it, giving the Spurs more financial flexibility moving forward. Between Jackson's $10 million and Manu Ginobili's $14 million, one would think the Spurs have room to make some moves this summer via free agency or trading for a guy and using the cap room to sign a guy like Paul Milsap or even Josh Smith. Alas, the NBA salary cap is not that simple. Long story short, the Spurs need to figure out how much they're going to pay Manu Ginobili next year before any other moves are made.

    Right now, the Spurs have a combined $30 million in contracts coming off the books this summer. That's Manu, Jackson, Tiago Splitter (restricted free agent), DeJuan Blair (restricted) and Gary Neal (restricted). Matt Bonner's contract is only guaranteed for $1 million if he's waived by June 29th, so that could be an extra $3 million off the books. Additionally, Boris Diaw and Patty Mills have player options on their deals. We'll assume they don't opt of their deals but the Spurs do waive Bonner and say they have approximately $33 million in expiring contracts which would get them about $23 million in cap space.

    While that number looks great, it's actually fools gold because of the cap holds that are associated with Ginobili, Jackson and Splitter. I'm by no means an expert on the salary cap, so I enlisted some help from ShamSports' Mark Deeks, who I would consider a cap expert. Despite what we think about the Spurs' expiring contracts, Deeks says it's very unlikely the Spurs will have any "significant" cap space this summer, mostly because of Manu's hold.

    "The size of a free agent's cap hold is determined by the size of his previous contract and the status of his Bird rights, a combination of which leads to a calculation of the cap hold size," Deeks said. "In Manu's case, his cap hold will be bloody enormous, equal to the maximum salary of a ten or more year veteran."

    That means somewhere in the $20 million range, which would put the Spurs just a few million dollars under the salary cap. So basically, they're stuck until both sides decide on a deal. Deeks also pointed out that there's one other way around cap holds, which is just to simply renounce the rights of the free agent. It wouldn't surprise me if this happened with Jackson, who has a $15 million cap hold of his own and they could likely re-sign using left over cap space or the mid-level exception.

    Another important reason to get Ginobili re-signed soon is so the Spurs will know how much money they will have to re-sign Tiago Splitter. The Spurs can match any offer teams make for Splitter, but make no mistake about it, he's going to get paid this summer. The bar was pretty much set for Splitter this summer when Omer Asik signed a three year, $25 million last season putting up far worse numbers than Splitter. Same theory applies for Nikola Pecovic but NOT for Timofey Mozgov. Deeks wouldn't set a price on Ginobili's next contract, but suggested Ginobili would be paid somewhere along the likes of Steve Nash, another over 35 year old recent free agent.

    "He could be the best paid 36 year old in the league. If a precipitous decline was going to happen, it probably would have started by now. His effectiveness will taper off a bit - I'd suggest it already has - and he'll be a mere 20 mpg player soon enough," Deeks said, "But if a player is better in those 20 mpg than most others are in 35mpg, he'll still get his."

    If I were a betting man, I'd bet Ginobili re-signs for two years and $14 million while Splitter gets three years and $27-30 million. That'd give them about $5 million extra to play with if they renounce Jack. This is all contingent on Manu deciding he's coming back for another season, which isn't guaranteed.
    http://www.projectspurs.com/2013-art...-ginobili.html


    'Coach, we've got an issue with Kawhi in the arena. Event management called and the lights are not on, and Kawhi's in the arena for two straight days at 6:30 in the morning. And he brought two lamps from home, and he put them up in the arena and shot.'

    ^

    (During NBA lockout)

    "No flash, No gimmicks. It's the quiet guys you should fear."


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Goshen, IN
    Posts
    1,956
    vCash
    1500
    Not a bad article. But a couple things. First off, the Bonner situation is fluid. First off, if we aren't going for a big free agent then why would we let bonner go? He can shoot the 3 and is under contract. And if we are looking for a big free agent, why would we pay him the 1mil instead of just amnestying the entire salary off the books? That is my thought on that. Also Gino's cap hold means very little. I am sure both parties have a pretty good idea of what a fair contract will look like and even though they will still have to negotiate, it shouldn't take real long if they wanted to chase after someone. As far as Splitter goes, Asik has defensive skills that Splitter hasn't shown as much of in my opinion and had much better per36 numbers. So I don't see him getting Asik numbers however he could get a solid offer somewhere or he could just sign his QO and plan on having a more productive year and then becoming a FA. That is an option, he doesn't have to sign elsewhere. So here is my understanding of the salary cap for next year:

    Duncan, Parker, Diaw, Green, Leonard, DeColo, Mills, Joseph = 37mil
    Baynes = 1mil, no idea but this covers the rumored amount.
    Splitter, Neal (RFA) = 6mil, Splitter may get more, but we won't pay more to keep Neal.
    Bonner = 3.9mil if kept, 1mil if waived, or 0mil if amnestied. I think it is the first or last option.
    Blair, Jackson (UFA) = 0mil, both will be renounced. Contrary to this article, Blair is not a RFA.
    Gino (UFA) = unknown, but he had better not get Nash money.

    So without Gino, Blair, Jackson, or Bonner we would have 11 guys at 44mil (Not including the amount of our draft pick)

    So that is getting close to a full roster. Throw in the DP, Bonner and Gino @ 7mil (sounds okay and this is what the article had) and we are around the 55mil mark and a full roster. This is why I think Bonner is amnestied and Neal and our DP might be gone. The other way to get a little cap space is to move Green and keep Neal, just a thought. Anyways, the article is right, unless we make major moves or don't plan to bring back Gino, we will not have a lot of money to play with this year.
    Last edited by benjirh; 01-23-2013 at 10:29 PM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Deuce Dimes
    Posts
    2,141
    vCash
    1500
    Honestly Manu needs to hang it up he is not worth 14 million anymore.....honestly I would not resign Manu he is always hurt and its getting worst every year it's time to reload and keep guys like Tiago and start preparing to resign Kawhi

    Amnesty Bonner, try and trade Neal and Blair and let Jackson walk and of course Manu

    Thank you Manu for the memories but it time to start moving on


    "The time when there is no one there to feel sorry for you or to cheer for you is when a player is made".
    - Tim Duncan


    *EAGLES (0-0)* SPURS (2-1) * PHILLIES (31-35)*

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •