Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter





Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 37
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    12,287
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by gotoHcarolina52 View Post
    Well that's good. Would be weird to have a basketball team in Seattle, not named the Sonics.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Shambala
    Posts
    43,085
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Big Zo View Post
    No doubt they'll be the Sonics. I'm just wondering if they'll use a throwback uniform, or go to a completely different look.
    use the late 70s until early 90s ones please, and the skyline logo.
    ]

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    MIAMI
    Posts
    9,276
    vCash
    1500
    They should use the space boner/galactic erection logo they used from 1967-1970, their original logo:

    http://i45.tinypic.com/2afztaf.gif

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    4,099
    vCash
    1500
    i say sonics....

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    365
    vCash
    1500
    Sonics over Kings. It's a no-brainer, every fan in Seattle wants the "Sonics" back.
    PSN: Celtics1080 | Twitter: @BostonRoundball

  6. #21
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    5,262
    vCash
    1500
    It's gonna suck that first game we play OKC, and get smacked.

    At least we get a Husky alum next year.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    SL, UT
    Posts
    1,488
    vCash
    1500
    There will be riots in the streets of Seattle if they don't change the name to Sonics.
    don't let it go to your head big fella

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Everywhere and Nowhere
    Posts
    2,317
    vCash
    1500
    The Losers



    Being banned is like going to a correctional facility, it doesn't correct anything, in fact, it makes you worse

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    california
    Posts
    1,290
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Hellcrooner View Post
    They should take sonics name and history back,

    Kings name and history should be shelved until either Sacramento, Kansas City/ Omaha/ cincinnatti or Rochester is given a team, if some of those citys get a team then they bring the kings( or royals) history and name back,


    Altough an interesting idea, the BEST idea would be.

    seattle = Sonics.

    Kings history and name = SELL TO NEW ORLEANS.

    Hornets name and history= Sell to CHARLOTTE

    Bobcats= to hell with that name and pathetic history.
    Somebody give this man a job with the league office.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    365
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by Hellcrooner View Post
    They should take sonics name and history back,

    Kings name and history should be shelved until either Sacramento, Kansas City/ Omaha/ cincinnatti or Rochester is given a team, if some of those citys get a team then they bring the kings( or royals) history and name back,


    Altough an interesting idea, the BEST idea would be.

    seattle = Sonics.

    Kings history and name = SELL TO NEW ORLEANS.

    Hornets name and history= Sell to CHARLOTTE

    Bobcats= to hell with that name and pathetic history.
    +1

    I'm not sure if its going to happen though, but a good idea nonetheless.
    PSN: Celtics1080 | Twitter: @BostonRoundball

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    33,108
    vCash
    2800
    I'd like to think the new owners would be willing to hang onto the Kings' history until a new Sacramento team comes along. Then let them have it back and move forward.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    33,108
    vCash
    2800
    Quote Originally Posted by Hellcrooner View Post
    They should take sonics name and history back,

    Kings name and history should be shelved until either Sacramento, Kansas City/ Omaha/ cincinnatti or Rochester is given a team, if some of those citys get a team then they bring the kings( or royals) history and name back,


    Altough an interesting idea, the BEST idea would be.

    seattle = Sonics.

    Kings history and name = SELL TO NEW ORLEANS.

    Hornets name and history= Sell to CHARLOTTE

    Bobcats= to hell with that name and pathetic history.
    Why sell the Kings' name to New Orleans?

  13. #28
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    California
    Posts
    27,235
    vCash
    500
    Quote Originally Posted by king4day View Post
    I'd like to think the new owners would be willing to hang onto the Kings' history until a new Sacramento team comes along. Then let them have it back and move forward.
    This is what I hope happens.

    Andrew Luck, Robert Griffin III, and Colin Kaepernick walk into a bar... To watch Russell Wilson win the Super Bowl.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Jamaica
    Posts
    2,195
    vCash
    1500
    The histories of the two teams is what confuses the hell out of me, like since the Thunder used to be the sonics but Seattle is getting a team back so what does that do to the Thunder since they still have the history of the Sonics with them, and now the Kings... blah blah blah. Yeah I'm lost just talking about it. :S

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Shambala
    Posts
    43,085
    vCash
    1500
    Quote Originally Posted by king4day View Post
    Why sell the Kings' name to New Orleans?
    1 name and history does not dissapear.

    2 kings fans still have the kings to root for albeit in another city.

    3 if NO continues to not work as a market, you just move them back to sac to the projected new arena.
    ]

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •