Before you say no , give these few things a thought:
1- a better defender that Derozan is, and actually looks like he is trying 100% of the time.
2- a much better 3pt shooter then Derozan is. (34.7% vs. 27.4%)
3- a better FT shooter then Derozan is. (85.5% vs 83.6%)
4- better at creating off the dribble and doesn't require a screen to get to the rim.
Anderson actually produces more points and more assists per 36 minutes then Derozan, and he is able to defend multiple positions. I would like to see Anderson get 30 mpg consistently for at least a couple weeks to see what kind of effect it has on this team. He put up 27 against OKC, and 27 against the Bulls. Those are 2 of the best defensive teams in the league, and he torched them both.
If you don't think he is playing better basketball then Derozan please simply state why...