
Originally Posted by
Da Swami
Yeah great idea after we invested so much.
Lame!
Maybe the time has come to finally evaluate the effectiveness of his continued employment in Oakland. All of that talent isn't worth much when you can't depend on getting it. Yes he had flashes of brilliance, and with different schemes and supporting cast. You can blame his lack of production (again with less that a full season of work) on a non fitting scheme and horrid play calling, which I would agree with, but how is any scheme or cast of players going to help his durability?
What? We're only going to use him sparingly to save him? Hell, if I don't see him but for half or a third of the offensive downs I'm going to know something is up, too easy to prepare for as an opposing D IMO. McFadden is not dominant enough to be effective in that limited a role. His appearance on the field needs to keep the opposing D guessing, not tipping them off.....
" I have only three rules, be on time, pay attention, and play like hell on Sunday"
-John Madden